202 heads "492" castings?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: BUFFALO, NY
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.73
202 heads "492" castings?
found a guy selling some 202 heads the casting number is 3991492. I am aware of the "461" "462" 202 fuelie camel hump heads but haven't heard of these ones. Are these heads any good for performance use with port/polish work
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Car: 66 Chevy II SS/89 iroc
Engine: 355/305
Transmission: 350 Turbo/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
I've got a few sets of 492 also 186's, back in the day they use to be the hot set up.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: BUFFALO, NY
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.73
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
i better pick them up then. My buddies 406 had 202 fuelie heads on it and that motor roared like a big block
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
They are not 202 heads. Please stop calling them that, that drives me nuts!
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.
Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.
Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: BUFFALO, NY
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.73
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
which are better 202 fuelie/camel hump heads or vortec heads?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
Vortecs with 2.02 valves, of course. But they cost more than $600/pair...
The 1.94 "vortec" heads, I don't know, probably be close, depends on who ports them...
With the old heads, it all depends on those front accy holes... If they ain't there, the heads are only good for early cars and hot-rods.
The 1.94 "vortec" heads, I don't know, probably be close, depends on who ports them...
With the old heads, it all depends on those front accy holes... If they ain't there, the heads are only good for early cars and hot-rods.
Last edited by Supervisor42; Oct 21, 2008 at 11:05 PM.
Trending Topics
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
$250 for a set of old camel back heads isn't a good deal even if they have 2.02 valves. Late model heads flow better and have better castings. There's more to heads than just the valve size.
Having the camel back heads rebuilt to good performance specs can cost a lot more than buying a good set of aftermarket heads. New valves, guides, larger springs which requires machining the spring pockets. If they don't have screw in studs, machining the stud boss down to install screw in studs. Just having all the machine work down and the cost of new parts can put those obsolete heads over $1000.
40 years ago, camel heads were a performance head because there was little to no aftermarket choices and production heads were all poor. With available choices now, camel heads are only good for collectors or someone who needs a specific casting.
Stock Eliminator racers still need camel heads however as soon as someone who's selling a set has done anything such as a valve job, port and polish etc, the Stockers can't use them.
Any head can have 2.02 valves. A real performance head can have 2.08 intake valves.
Having the camel back heads rebuilt to good performance specs can cost a lot more than buying a good set of aftermarket heads. New valves, guides, larger springs which requires machining the spring pockets. If they don't have screw in studs, machining the stud boss down to install screw in studs. Just having all the machine work down and the cost of new parts can put those obsolete heads over $1000.
40 years ago, camel heads were a performance head because there was little to no aftermarket choices and production heads were all poor. With available choices now, camel heads are only good for collectors or someone who needs a specific casting.
Stock Eliminator racers still need camel heads however as soon as someone who's selling a set has done anything such as a valve job, port and polish etc, the Stockers can't use them.
Any head can have 2.02 valves. A real performance head can have 2.08 intake valves.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
You can get junkyard Vortecs for a song, and have them rebuilt for not much more. They are 10x better than the double-hump castings - more power, torque, throttle response, and fuel mileage. Better heads in every way, and you can build them for about the same.
Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
They are not 202 heads. Please stop calling them that, that drives me nuts!
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.
Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.
Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads

Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
You can get junkyard Vortecs for a song, and have them rebuilt for not much more. They are 10x better than the double-hump castings - more power, torque, throttle response, and fuel mileage. Better heads in every way, and you can build them for about the same.
Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
'Vortec' not 'Vortex'... and Vortec heads are their own unique animal - very tall and narrow intake ports and a unique intake bolt pattern that only uses 4 intake bolts on each side, that point straight up. Normal SBC heads have 6 on each side, and only some point up.
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 374
Likes: 2
From: Ankeny Iowa
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
A 492 is a good head, They will get the job done. I have the 292 angle plug heads which were only sold over the counter bare and they work great, yes a new set of performance heads will outflow them but these have been ported and the WOW factor that i get out of them is worth it. So buy them and put them on!!
Mark.
Mark.
Last edited by whatever84; Mar 4, 2011 at 03:52 PM.
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
A 492 is a good head, They will get the job done. I have the 292 angle plug heads which were only sold over the counter bare and they work great, yes a new set of performance heads will outflow them but these have been ported and the WOW factor that i get out of them worth it. So buy them and put them on!!
Mark.
Mark.
DSLee
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 374
Likes: 2
From: Ankeny Iowa
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
Regards,
DSLee
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 27
From: Sanctuary state
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?
Porting a cast iron head isnt cheap, a nice job will set you back more than a new set of those Vortecs. Plus any machine work, ie surface valve job spring/seals etc if they need it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92projectcamaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 18, 2016 08:00 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM






