Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

202 heads "492" castings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #1  
Rayzor32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: BUFFALO, NY
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.73
202 heads "492" castings?

found a guy selling some 202 heads the casting number is 3991492. I am aware of the "461" "462" 202 fuelie camel hump heads but haven't heard of these ones. Are these heads any good for performance use with port/polish work
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
1bad66ss's Avatar
Junior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Car: 66 Chevy II SS/89 iroc
Engine: 355/305
Transmission: 350 Turbo/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

I've got a few sets of 492 also 186's, back in the day they use to be the hot set up.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #3  
Rayzor32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: BUFFALO, NY
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.73
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

i better pick them up then. My buddies 406 had 202 fuelie heads on it and that motor roared like a big block
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #4  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

They are not 202 heads. Please stop calling them that, that drives me nuts!
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.

Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #5  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by Sonix
Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
But they are the best $250/pair heads around. If they have the front accessory mounting holes and you don't want to spend $600 for Vortecs, they'll work.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #6  
Rayzor32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: BUFFALO, NY
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.73
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

which are better 202 fuelie/camel hump heads or vortec heads?
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 11:01 PM
  #7  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by Rayzor32
which are better 202 fuelie/camel hump heads or vortec heads?
Vortecs with 2.02 valves, of course. But they cost more than $600/pair...
The 1.94 "vortec" heads, I don't know, probably be close, depends on who ports them...
With the old heads, it all depends on those front accy holes... If they ain't there, the heads are only good for early cars and hot-rods.

Last edited by Supervisor42; Oct 21, 2008 at 11:05 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 08:25 AM
  #8  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

$250 for a set of old camel back heads isn't a good deal even if they have 2.02 valves. Late model heads flow better and have better castings. There's more to heads than just the valve size.

Having the camel back heads rebuilt to good performance specs can cost a lot more than buying a good set of aftermarket heads. New valves, guides, larger springs which requires machining the spring pockets. If they don't have screw in studs, machining the stud boss down to install screw in studs. Just having all the machine work down and the cost of new parts can put those obsolete heads over $1000.

40 years ago, camel heads were a performance head because there was little to no aftermarket choices and production heads were all poor. With available choices now, camel heads are only good for collectors or someone who needs a specific casting.

Stock Eliminator racers still need camel heads however as soon as someone who's selling a set has done anything such as a valve job, port and polish etc, the Stockers can't use them.

Any head can have 2.02 valves. A real performance head can have 2.08 intake valves.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #9  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

You can get junkyard Vortecs for a song, and have them rebuilt for not much more. They are 10x better than the double-hump castings - more power, torque, throttle response, and fuel mileage. Better heads in every way, and you can build them for about the same.

Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 08:35 AM
  #10  
NHEngineer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by Sonix
They are not 202 heads. Please stop calling them that, that drives me nuts!
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.

Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
Please to explain what a "202" head is. I always thought "202" designated the intake valve diameter; i. e. 2.02" diameter. If not, what is a "202" head? By the way, patten number 3991492 is from a '69 to '72 350 with 2.02" intake and 1.60" exhaust [yup, I know I'm about two years late with that info].
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #11  
NHEngineer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by Air_Adam
You can get junkyard Vortecs for a song, and have them rebuilt for not much more. They are 10x better than the double-hump castings - more power, torque, throttle response, and fuel mileage. Better heads in every way, and you can build them for about the same.

Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
How can I tell if the head is a Vortex or not?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 08:22 PM
  #12  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by NHEngineer
How can I tell if the head is a Vortex or not?
'Vortec' not 'Vortex'... and Vortec heads are their own unique animal - very tall and narrow intake ports and a unique intake bolt pattern that only uses 4 intake bolts on each side, that point straight up. Normal SBC heads have 6 on each side, and only some point up.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #13  
whatever84's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 374
Likes: 2
From: Ankeny Iowa
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

A 492 is a good head, They will get the job done. I have the 292 angle plug heads which were only sold over the counter bare and they work great, yes a new set of performance heads will outflow them but these have been ported and the WOW factor that i get out of them is worth it. So buy them and put them on!!


Mark.

Last edited by whatever84; Mar 4, 2011 at 03:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #14  
NHEngineer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by whatever84
A 492 is a good head, They will get the job done. I have the 292 angle plug heads which were only sold over the counter bare and they work great, yes a new set of performance heads will outflow them but these have been ported and the WOW factor that i get out of them worth it. So buy them and put them on!!

Mark.
OK, I will. Got a good source? I'm putting together a 350 for 1/4 mile circle track racing. Someone told me Vortex heads cooling passages don't line up with earlier vintage blocks. Is that true?

DSLee
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 08:27 AM
  #15  
NHEngineer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by Air_Adam
'Vortec' not 'Vortex'... and Vortec heads are their own unique animal - very tall and narrow intake ports and a unique intake bolt pattern that only uses 4 intake bolts on each side, that point straight up. Normal SBC heads have 6 on each side, and only some point up.
Thanks Adam. Sorry for another dumb question but what is "SBC"? I've been away from Chevy racing stuff for a while [30 years].
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 09:45 AM
  #16  
whatever84's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 374
Likes: 2
From: Ankeny Iowa
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by NHEngineer
Thanks Adam. Sorry for another dumb question but what is "SBC"? I've been away from Chevy racing stuff for a while [30 years].
SBC= Small Block Chevy.


Mark.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #17  
NHEngineer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by Rayzor32
found a guy selling some 202 heads the casting number is 3991492. I am aware of the "461" "462" 202 fuelie camel hump heads but haven't heard of these ones. Are these heads any good for performance use with port/polish work
In case anyone is interested, the link click here is an index of most Chevrolet engine and cylinder head patten numbers sorted by number. It's in a YAHOO group so you may need to join before you can open it ....or not. You can always quit once you've downloaded the book.

Regards,
DSLee
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 10:04 AM
  #18  
NHEngineer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Originally Posted by whatever84
SBC= Small Block Chevy.


Mark.
Jeekers, now I feel like a real jerk. Sorry.....
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 02:02 PM
  #19  
cuisinartvette's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 27
From: Sanctuary state
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Porting a cast iron head isnt cheap, a nice job will set you back more than a new set of those Vortecs. Plus any machine work, ie surface valve job spring/seals etc if they need it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
norcalz28
Northern California
26
Dec 7, 2016 12:49 PM
92projectcamaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 18, 2016 08:00 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM
z28guy134
Engine Swap
1
Sep 1, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.