To bore or not to bore
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Galax Virgina
Car: 2001 Jeep 1984 S-10 daliy drivers
Engine: 1983 has a 305 1984 Trans Am
Transmission: 1983 has 350 tubo 1984 Trans Am
Axle/Gears: stock
To bore or not to bore
Ok I have a good 350. I know I am going to replace the pistons and rods for some better ones. My questions is should i have the blocked bored or just leave it staduard. And does borin it to .030 over really help it any. Thanks
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: To bore or not to bore
boring doesnt really do anything power wise maybe give ya another 10hp or so. Its purpose is to true and clean up the cylinders. It takes the out-of-round and taper out of the cylinders. If your going through all the trouble of buying new rods and pistons u might as well bore it. I would have it aligned honed too. Align honing trues up all of the main caps and perfectly aligns them.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: To bore or not to bore
10hp if you have a few NOS stickers and bolt on wings maybe.
realistically, you are looking at under 5 hp difference.
you dont bore to get power or displacement, as was already said.
you re-bore the engine to clean it up.
generally speaking, anytime the engine needs a rebuild, its a good idea to overbore it.
sometimes you can get away with less than 0.030" over, but finding pistons in, say, 0.010" over may be more expensive than 0.030" over, so thats why typical increments are in 0.030"... its just cheaper
realistically, you are looking at under 5 hp difference.
you dont bore to get power or displacement, as was already said.
you re-bore the engine to clean it up.
generally speaking, anytime the engine needs a rebuild, its a good idea to overbore it.
sometimes you can get away with less than 0.030" over, but finding pistons in, say, 0.010" over may be more expensive than 0.030" over, so thats why typical increments are in 0.030"... its just cheaper
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: To bore or not to bore
10hp if you have a few NOS stickers and bolt on wings maybe.
realistically, you are looking at under 5 hp difference.
you dont bore to get power or displacement, as was already said.
you re-bore the engine to clean it up.
generally speaking, anytime the engine needs a rebuild, its a good idea to overbore it.
sometimes you can get away with less than 0.030" over, but finding pistons in, say, 0.010" over may be more expensive than 0.030" over, so thats why typical increments are in 0.030"... its just cheaper
realistically, you are looking at under 5 hp difference.
you dont bore to get power or displacement, as was already said.
you re-bore the engine to clean it up.
generally speaking, anytime the engine needs a rebuild, its a good idea to overbore it.
sometimes you can get away with less than 0.030" over, but finding pistons in, say, 0.010" over may be more expensive than 0.030" over, so thats why typical increments are in 0.030"... its just cheaper
-- Joe
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: To bore or not to bore
anethesis - what happened to the 'vette?
Cool '79 Camaro though!!!
You are joking though right? I mean, you're looking at right on 3% increase in displacement. So if you were making 400HP, you'd be making right around 412HP or so. 3% is TEENY !
Cool '79 Camaro though!!!
You are joking though right? I mean, you're looking at right on 3% increase in displacement. So if you were making 400HP, you'd be making right around 412HP or so. 3% is TEENY !
Re: To bore or not to bore
Actually besides displacement you also have slightly better compression and less valve shrouding, so maybe like 17 hp instead of 12, which is still only a few percent, but How many people here throw more money chasing less power- underdrive pulleys, some cam swaps, engine mounts, some intake swaps, higher ratio rockers, etc- all of them on their own are only worth a few percent but when you combine them something magical happens and you actually begin to maek decent power.
That being said most of the power increase you get will actaulyl come from truing the bores and having better ring seal- go for the overbore.
That being said most of the power increase you get will actaulyl come from truing the bores and having better ring seal- go for the overbore.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: To bore or not to bore
I hated it. No matter how much money I threw at it, It just didn't please me.
Thank you. Figured I'd make an f-body comeback.
Of course, but these boards have been so dead lately I thought I'd contribute at least something.
4.185" bore is pretty damn big though. I never had a 400 before so, I hope this thing pleases me. Shooting for over 500hp/500tq.
-- Joe
Thank you. Figured I'd make an f-body comeback.
4.185" bore is pretty damn big though. I never had a 400 before so, I hope this thing pleases me. Shooting for over 500hp/500tq.
-- Joe
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: To bore or not to bore
Actually besides displacement you also have slightly better compression and less valve shrouding, so maybe like 17 hp instead of 12, which is still only a few percent, but How many people here throw more money chasing less power- underdrive pulleys, some cam swaps, engine mounts, some intake swaps, higher ratio rockers, etc- all of them on their own are only worth a few percent but when you combine them something magical happens and you actually begin to maek decent power.
That being said most of the power increase you get will actaulyl come from truing the bores and having better ring seal- go for the overbore.
That being said most of the power increase you get will actaulyl come from truing the bores and having better ring seal- go for the overbore.
There is something to be said about sidewall clearance. You hone a block a few times and you might as well overbore it. I had actually planned on doing a 406, but I got a deal on some eagle rods and forged reverse dome pistons, and a timing set and some head bolts for $350 to my door, where as the parts would have been $780 new. Since going .060 over doesn't cost any more than going .030 over, it was a no brainer really. I think we went like .004" on the final hone for sidewall clearance.
Although, I did end up doing more machine work to this 400 than I have EVER done to a 350. And I wasn't too impressed with how much folks are getting for Forged cranks these days.. wtf.
-- Joe
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 1
From: sunny so cal.
Car: 1990
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: To bore or not to bore
I don't modify stock motors so I don't usually get mixed up with a lot of that stuff. I usually buy rollers, and then plan out what engine is going into it. Do tons of simulations, take notes on other peoples results, etc. It's easier for me. (though, expensive).
There is something to be said about sidewall clearance. You hone a block a few times and you might as well overbore it. I had actually planned on doing a 406, but I got a deal on some eagle rods and forged reverse dome pistons, and a timing set and some head bolts for $350 to my door, where as the parts would have been $780 new. Since going .060 over doesn't cost any more than going .030 over, it was a no brainer really. I think we went like .004" on the final hone for sidewall clearance.
Although, I did end up doing more machine work to this 400 than I have EVER done to a 350. And I wasn't too impressed with how much folks are getting for Forged cranks these days.. wtf.
-- Joe
There is something to be said about sidewall clearance. You hone a block a few times and you might as well overbore it. I had actually planned on doing a 406, but I got a deal on some eagle rods and forged reverse dome pistons, and a timing set and some head bolts for $350 to my door, where as the parts would have been $780 new. Since going .060 over doesn't cost any more than going .030 over, it was a no brainer really. I think we went like .004" on the final hone for sidewall clearance.
Although, I did end up doing more machine work to this 400 than I have EVER done to a 350. And I wasn't too impressed with how much folks are getting for Forged cranks these days.. wtf.
-- Joe
and search? why look for search when you can get someone to spoon feed you.
i did that when i first got here but learning about your car is fun.
i am about ready to rebuild my 305 - just cause i want to keep the same numbers as when new.
so if you are only going to bore it once - what kind of hp are you looking at if you a new cam, heads, tpi, - headers - the regular stuff.
eventually i wil go to a 350 - i may still do that, but even that will need work - it just wont be good enough.
as for the crank, i know it has to be balanced for the piston and rod weight - so what would you recommend?
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: To bore or not to bore
You only bore to get the cylinder walls round again.
Boring factory blocks is always risky. You never know how thick the cylinder walls are. So you bore the block until the cylinders are back round again. The less you bore, the more rebuilds you can get out of the block (assuming it's a good block, sometimes there's sentimental value, etc) and my first 350 was a .060 over block. Lasted about a week before I developed a crack in the cylinder bore.
If you've got an aftermarket block that can handle a decent overbore, go for it, but for a factory block, there are much better, more responsible ways to get more power than boring. Stroke it, put a bigger cam in it, port the heads, put some nice backcut valves in it... anything. Boring a motor gets you so little in performance compared to the risks and reduced lifespan of the block (Assuming you go farther than necessary).
.030 over is usually safe. Beyond that you never know.
Boring factory blocks is always risky. You never know how thick the cylinder walls are. So you bore the block until the cylinders are back round again. The less you bore, the more rebuilds you can get out of the block (assuming it's a good block, sometimes there's sentimental value, etc) and my first 350 was a .060 over block. Lasted about a week before I developed a crack in the cylinder bore.
If you've got an aftermarket block that can handle a decent overbore, go for it, but for a factory block, there are much better, more responsible ways to get more power than boring. Stroke it, put a bigger cam in it, port the heads, put some nice backcut valves in it... anything. Boring a motor gets you so little in performance compared to the risks and reduced lifespan of the block (Assuming you go farther than necessary).
.030 over is usually safe. Beyond that you never know.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








