Which AFR's would be best?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Which AFR's would be best?
Ok so here are the engine specs and then future plans.
383 fully forged
11.2:1 Compression
041 heads (2.02/1.5)
XE284H (flat tappet, Duration 240/246, 110 lobe seperation)
Weiand Stealth high rise w/ 1" closed element riser
Holley 700 DP
T-5 (no comments)
3.73's in 10 bolt (no comments)
I have been looking at the AFR 227cc & 235cc. I plan on throwing a little 100 shot of N2O on it later down the road.
My current pistons are Probe SRS flat tops with valve relief cuts. I currently have enough clearance but was wondering if i went to a larger intake and exhaust valves (diameter) will i have to get my pistons fly cut more in order to fit the larger valves?
o ya and which of the 2 heads would be the best match for my setup.
Thanks guys and gals
383 fully forged
11.2:1 Compression
041 heads (2.02/1.5)
XE284H (flat tappet, Duration 240/246, 110 lobe seperation)
Weiand Stealth high rise w/ 1" closed element riser
Holley 700 DP
T-5 (no comments)
3.73's in 10 bolt (no comments)
I have been looking at the AFR 227cc & 235cc. I plan on throwing a little 100 shot of N2O on it later down the road.
My current pistons are Probe SRS flat tops with valve relief cuts. I currently have enough clearance but was wondering if i went to a larger intake and exhaust valves (diameter) will i have to get my pistons fly cut more in order to fit the larger valves?
o ya and which of the 2 heads would be the best match for my setup.
Thanks guys and gals
Last edited by chas0218; Aug 20, 2009 at 07:22 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
ok so i found my pistons specs and the fly cuts are 2.150 in diameter for both the intake and exhaust. .250 is the depth. so i was thinking is there an equation to figure out how much my cam actually pushes the valves into the combustion chamber using my rocker arm ratio?
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: wv
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355 stealth ram, dart heads, S480
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
man i've saw guys running almost .600 lift without any worries id say you'll be fine.. the formula for valve lift is take the "cam lift" and mulitply it by your rocker ratio.. as far as the heads for id go for the 227cc with the competition port job....anything bigger would be to much for your engine....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
man i've saw guys running almost .600 lift without any worries id say you'll be fine.. the formula for valve lift is take the "cam lift" and mulitply it by your rocker ratio.. as far as the heads for id go for the 227cc with the competition port job....anything bigger would be to much for your engine....
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: wv
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355 stealth ram, dart heads, S480
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
well i just looked up the cam your running.... with 1.5 ratio rockers your lift is only .507 intake and .510 on exhaust if your running 1.6 rockers intake would be .541 and exhaust .544 if your gonna run afr's id deff change to 1.6 rockers more lift the better of you are with those heads...but that cam wouldnt do bad with 1.6 rockers Its actually called lobe lift... on the card here is the link to it..incase you've lost your card
http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...x?csid=88&sb=0
http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...x?csid=88&sb=0
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
well i just looked up the cam your running.... with 1.5 ratio rockers your lift is only .507 intake and .510 on exhaust if your running 1.6 rockers intake would be .541 and exhaust .544 if your gonna run afr's id deff change to 1.6 rockers more lift the better of you are with those heads...but that cam wouldnt do bad with 1.6 rockers Its actually called lobe lift... on the card here is the link to it..incase you've lost your card
http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...x?csid=88&sb=0
http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...x?csid=88&sb=0
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
I wouldn't mess with 1.7s. Rocker ratio changes are not going to buy you much power and really high ratio stuff brings it's own problems that you might not want to deal with.
Also, those heads are both overkill for your combination. AFR 195 Eliminator heads are more than adequate to feed that engine. If you feel like going for a little more peak power then step up to the bigger 210s. Compared to the 041s even the smallest set of AFRs will be like bolting a second engine under the hood. You'll probably destroy the rest of your drivetrain even before you bolt on the nitrous system.
Also, those heads are both overkill for your combination. AFR 195 Eliminator heads are more than adequate to feed that engine. If you feel like going for a little more peak power then step up to the bigger 210s. Compared to the 041s even the smallest set of AFRs will be like bolting a second engine under the hood. You'll probably destroy the rest of your drivetrain even before you bolt on the nitrous system.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: wv
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355 stealth ram, dart heads, S480
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
i agree with staying away from the 1.7 rockers...as far as the head selection...that these guys are talkin about....i personally would go below 210.... im runnin 200 in a 355 and love the way they react.... "to each his own!"
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Maui, Hawaii
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
227's are for WILD, 550+hp, 383+ci motors. the 235's should not be used under 400 cubes unless you are spinning to 9k.
depends on your goals for your engine. all out drag racer, 210's. street/strip, 195's.
depends on your goals for your engine. all out drag racer, 210's. street/strip, 195's.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
I want this to be at least a 500 hp/500 ft.lbs. at the flywheel that was why i was leaning towards the 227's. Im not entirely concerned with street manners, Seeing how im going to throw in a 4000 stall in front of a bult 700r4. I want to be in the high 11's and have TONS of torque all said and done.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Maui, Hawaii
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
if you want torque, stay away from the 227 and 235. the bigger the runner, the less lowend torque and more highend hp. CHP made 615hp with the 195 eliminators. the 210's will be more than sufficient.
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: wv
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355 stealth ram, dart heads, S480
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
the 210's are a nasty head....but even the 195's will do what your lookin for with no problem!!.. As far as throwing a 4000 stall in front of a 700r....good luck..hahaha those tranny's are about as stout as a wet noodle, for what your lookin to do with this car you should look into a th350 or 400
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
the 210's are a nasty head....but even the 195's will do what your lookin for with no problem!!.. As far as throwing a 4000 stall in front of a 700r....good luck..hahaha those tranny's are about as stout as a wet noodle, for what your lookin to do with this car you should look into a th350 or 400
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: Which AFR's would be best?
Everyone I know who went bigger never regretted it. IIRC, the 227cc heads have their own headaches with valvetrain components, but skip the 195cc and go for at least the 210cc. You won't regret going bigger. I've never met anyone who has.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
5
Sep 28, 2015 05:50 PM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
Sep 13, 2015 11:35 PM





