Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Performer VS Performer RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #1  
RK82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Summerland, B.C
Car: 1982 Trans am
Engine: 383
Transmission: AGE M22Z
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 detroit locker
Performer VS Performer RPM

I have a edelbrock performer EPS on my car now, my buddy gave me a Performer RPM. My question is will it be worth changing intakes?, will I even notice a difference? my car is a 82 firebird with a 305 LE9 out of a 84 chevy 1/2 ton truck, its got a 1805 Edelbrock carb, flowtech 1" 5/8 headers and 3" exhaust with a flowmaster muffler.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #2  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,804
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

probably wont notice a difference.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
camaronewbie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

I thought most TGO folks agreed that the Performer wasn't worth the money, but the Performer RPM was the intake of choice? At least that's what I read over the years.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #4  
bakes85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 1985 trans am
Engine: 1969 chevy 350 .060 over
Transmission: 5spd
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

correct me if im wrong, but isnt the only difference in edelbrock's intakes the operating RPM they are designed for?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #5  
RK82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Summerland, B.C
Car: 1982 Trans am
Engine: 383
Transmission: AGE M22Z
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 detroit locker
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

Originally Posted by camaronewbie
I thought most TGO folks agreed that the Performer wasn't worth the money, but the Performer RPM was the intake of choice? At least that's what I read over the years.
Thats what I thought.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #6  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: High plains of NM
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

That is what I thought also.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #7  
Irockz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Springfield,Mo
Car: 87 Berlinetta,work in progress
Engine: 468 BB,still in the build process
Transmission: TH350,3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 9" Ford,learning how to live under
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

The Performer is an entry level intake,that is a little better than stock,but not a whole lot.The Performer RPM is a much better flowing intake,with more hp potential.However,on a stock 305 without any other modifications,I doubt you'd see any noticable gain,and you might even see a small loss in off idle performance.Intakes are like any other part of an engine,bigger does not always mean better.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #8  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

Originally Posted by bakes85
correct me if im wrong, but isnt the only difference in edelbrock's intakes the operating RPM they are designed for?
Right, runner size shape and length totally different, meaning it's a totally different intake.

I actually measured my performer non-rpm today, and the port size is 1.2x1.9, so it's a bit smaller than a 1205 gasket which is considered a hot street port.

For comparison sake, a stock TPI baseplate is 1.20x1.96, so the performer is close to stock.

I'm assuming the RPM is spot-on at 1.20x2.04 which is what similar performance manifolds measure out at, but I don't have one to measure.

-- Joe
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 08:10 AM
  #9  
SSC's Avatar
SSC
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

I glanced at a performer EPS once. Looked like a slightly smaller version of the RPM wasnt to interested in comparing it to a stock performer which just by glance it was larger. The RPM is considered a high performance dual plane intake. The perforomer and EPS are stock replacments the EPS is middle of the road from what ive read with slightly better flow then a performer intake. The RPM is a great intake I run one on my bird and I use it for a DD and I have had great results with it.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #10  
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 6
From: Huntington WV
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

I currently run that intake on my l69 305. When I swapped over to it I really didn't notice a whole lot of gain over my original intake tho.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 03:15 AM
  #11  
RK82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Summerland, B.C
Car: 1982 Trans am
Engine: 383
Transmission: AGE M22Z
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 detroit locker
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

Originally Posted by Ivelostcontact
I currently run that intake on my l69 305. When I swapped over to it I really didn't notice a whole lot of gain over my original intake tho.
EPS or RPM intake?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 10:39 PM
  #12  
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 6
From: Huntington WV
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

The performer rpm. I imagine you'll have a little bit of gain but nothing drastic. Probably 6 or 7 more hp and 2 or 3lb torque. If you already have it and it's a sunny day might as well go ahead and put it on but don't expect to be blown away by the results. It is a good intake tho. Also your powerband will probably shift up 500ish rpms.

Last edited by Ivelostcontact; Nov 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
IROCtometal
TPI
2
Sep 20, 2015 11:08 PM
IROCtometal
TPI
3
Sep 9, 2015 10:01 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.