Underperforming 383
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Underperforming 383
343 rwhp, 352 rwtq.
383, 10.3:1, AFR 195 heads, Stealth Ram, 52mm throttle body, de-screened MAF, 32 lb Bosch gen III injectors, Howards Max Torque roller 234 242 .569" .585", SLP 1.75" ceramic coated headers, Magnaflow cat, Magnaflow cat-back.
Air/Fuel Ratio was 13.5:1 +/- .2 for the duration of the dyno pull.
We did one pull with the air cleaner lid removed (to rule out the air cleaner as the restriction) and it picked up nothing. I know that the single 3" exhaust is a restriction, but 40 to 60 hp? This motor should make at least 380 hp to the wheels.
It has a 700r4, Midwest 9.5" 3400 rpm stall, 4.10 gears.
Any ideas?
383, 10.3:1, AFR 195 heads, Stealth Ram, 52mm throttle body, de-screened MAF, 32 lb Bosch gen III injectors, Howards Max Torque roller 234 242 .569" .585", SLP 1.75" ceramic coated headers, Magnaflow cat, Magnaflow cat-back.
Air/Fuel Ratio was 13.5:1 +/- .2 for the duration of the dyno pull.
We did one pull with the air cleaner lid removed (to rule out the air cleaner as the restriction) and it picked up nothing. I know that the single 3" exhaust is a restriction, but 40 to 60 hp? This motor should make at least 380 hp to the wheels.
It has a 700r4, Midwest 9.5" 3400 rpm stall, 4.10 gears.
Any ideas?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: Clovis NM
Car: 2012 F350 lariot/1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Powerstroke/6.0
Transmission: 6R100/4L80e
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42
Re: Underperforming 383
tune if its not done already but check for valve float it will make if feel good till about 3500 then feel like its droping off coud just need a spring upgrade with that size cam I would have 987s
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
We made several pulls changing timing and fuel until we found what the motor liked best. While tuning, the runs started at 313 rwhp (very lean up top, slightly rich down low). We next tuned to achieve an optimal a/fr, followed by adjusting the timing advance.
The engine runs well, and sounds good, datalogs all look good. It just seems to be getting choked by something, which prompted us to remove the air lid and allow the motor to draw air straight through the MAF. Again, we picked up a few hp in the midrange but nothing on top. This is what leads us to suspect the exhaust as the restriction, but could it really be 50 to 60 hp?
The engine runs well, and sounds good, datalogs all look good. It just seems to be getting choked by something, which prompted us to remove the air lid and allow the motor to draw air straight through the MAF. Again, we picked up a few hp in the midrange but nothing on top. This is what leads us to suspect the exhaust as the restriction, but could it really be 50 to 60 hp?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
I'm running Beehive springs with tool steel retainers. They are 135# seated (1.750" height) and 367# at 1.150" (353# @ 1.165, my open height).
I should have enough spring, but maybe not?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
Comp Cams 26918-16 - Comp Cams Beehive Valve Springs Details
Chevy LS1/LS2/LS6
Specs
OD: Top 1.075" Bottom 1.310"
ID: Top .650" Bottom .885"
Seat Pressure: 125 lbs @ 1.800''
Open Pressure: 367 lbs @ 1.150''
Coil Bind: 1.100"
Spring Rate: 372 lbs/in
Chevy LS1/LS2/LS6
Specs
OD: Top 1.075" Bottom 1.310"
ID: Top .650" Bottom .885"
Seat Pressure: 125 lbs @ 1.800''
Open Pressure: 367 lbs @ 1.150''
Coil Bind: 1.100"
Spring Rate: 372 lbs/in
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 202
Likes: 1
From: williamstown,NJ
Car: 95 9C1,99 Sierra,90Sierra,00 sierra
Engine: TBI350,LM7,LT1,Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4,4L60e,4L60e,4L80e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt,14bolt,3:42,3:73,3:08,3:73.
Re: Underperforming 383
unbolt it from the collector see what it puts out then.youll probably gain 10+hp with true dual but not 50hp.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
What was the rpm at which you made peak hp, and after the peak what does the hp curve do. With your setup you should be making way more hp and torque than that!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
Torque peak is at 4550. The curve goes up slowly, has a dip at 5100 (305 hp @ 5000, 295 hp @ 5075, 305 hp @ 5150) and then slowly goes up again. Peak hp is at 5900.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
Can you post the dyno graph? It sounds like you are ok as far as valve float but I would need to see the graph and would like to see more spring for that cam also. Have you been to the track with it since the dyno? If so what was your trap mph? If your motor is sound and needs more exhaust then you could be loosing quite a bit from it. Need more data tho.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: batavia ohio
Car: 1992 z-28
Engine: 383 stealthram
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
I have dual cutouts on my exhaust with nowhere close to the goodies you have.
gain 3 tenths and 3mph with them open. exhaust is 3 inch flowmaster with no cats.
my guess it's the exhaust.
gain 3 tenths and 3mph with them open. exhaust is 3 inch flowmaster with no cats.
my guess it's the exhaust.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
I had the cat installed on Saturday (before the dynotune) because the hollow factory cat sounded terrible, and I was hoping to quiet the car down a bit (Lots of kids in my neighborhood, including my 2 yr old, and I leave for work at 6:00 am). The turbulent reverb sound is gone, but the car is not really any quieter, and the power loss was noticeable. I think that maybe the cat needs to be replaced with a straight pipe since it didn't quiet my car down anyway, but then I'm still dealing with a 3" catback.
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Southern Wisconsin
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: Probuilt 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Underperforming 383
it has to be your exhaust. I don't have any dyno number difference. But once at the strip I left the cutout closed and ran a 12.20 and the very next run, I opened the cutout and ran a 11.72. Huge difference. I had a 3 inch catback just like you. I would look into getting a cutout
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
You could run a free flowing exhaust system that is quiet. Dual 3" into a terminator box back into dual 3" mufflers (magnaflows or pypes) all tucked in and won't kill your HP.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
Well that may have to wait till the spring because I am going to be moving the shop to a new location that will start construction a few months. Until then I am finishing up some long term projects to clear the current shop out.
Re: Underperforming 383
343 rwhp, 352 rwtq.
383, 10.3:1, AFR 195 heads, Stealth Ram, 52mm throttle body, de-screened MAF, 32 lb Bosch gen III injectors, Howards Max Torque roller 234 242 .569" .585", SLP 1.75" ceramic coated headers, Magnaflow cat, Magnaflow cat-back.
Air/Fuel Ratio was 13.5:1 +/- .2 for the duration of the dyno pull.
We did one pull with the air cleaner lid removed (to rule out the air cleaner as the restriction) and it picked up nothing. I know that the single 3" exhaust is a restriction, but 40 to 60 hp? This motor should make at least 380 hp to the wheels.
It has a 700r4, Midwest 9.5" 3400 rpm stall, 4.10 gears.
Any ideas?
383, 10.3:1, AFR 195 heads, Stealth Ram, 52mm throttle body, de-screened MAF, 32 lb Bosch gen III injectors, Howards Max Torque roller 234 242 .569" .585", SLP 1.75" ceramic coated headers, Magnaflow cat, Magnaflow cat-back.
Air/Fuel Ratio was 13.5:1 +/- .2 for the duration of the dyno pull.
We did one pull with the air cleaner lid removed (to rule out the air cleaner as the restriction) and it picked up nothing. I know that the single 3" exhaust is a restriction, but 40 to 60 hp? This motor should make at least 380 hp to the wheels.
It has a 700r4, Midwest 9.5" 3400 rpm stall, 4.10 gears.
Any ideas?
whats your ignition advance curve look like?
can you post CLEAR LABELED pictures of the spark plugs?
theres always a reason and a logical, test, & verify ,step, bye, step approach rather than random parts swapping and wild guesses will locate the problem
Last edited by grumpyvette; Sep 7, 2011 at 01:31 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
We set the timing where the engine made maximum power. When we lost power, we re-burnt the chip with the last timing values.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
Originally Posted by grumpyvette
why not test the exhaust back pressure, to see if its over 2-3 psi at high rpms , indicating a restriction or temporarily disconnect the exhaust system to see if the change in restriction makes a difference in your results?
whats your ignition advance curve look like?
can you post CLEAR LABELED pictures of the spark plugs?
theres always a reason and a logical, test, & verify ,step, bye, step approach rather than random parts swapping and wild guesses will locate the problem
whats your ignition advance curve look like?
can you post CLEAR LABELED pictures of the spark plugs?
theres always a reason and a logical, test, & verify ,step, bye, step approach rather than random parts swapping and wild guesses will locate the problem
I do not know the exact advance curve because I was not the one burning the chip. I just know that my tuner added timing at various points until we lost power or encountered spark retard, and then backed up to the last good value.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
I should add.... While we were trying to richen the a/fr up high (it would go to 16:1 a/fr when the rpms went over 4000) I watched the fuel pressure gauge to make sure it wasn't due to fuel pressure loss. The fuel pressure actually climbed above its set point.
It is set to 44 psi with the vacuum port open, and idles at 39-40 psi at idle with the vacuum reference line in place. While making the dyno runs, my pressure would linearly increase with the rpm's of my motor up to 46 psi or a bit more.
How is this possible with out positive pressure being present at the regulator diaphragm?
It is set to 44 psi with the vacuum port open, and idles at 39-40 psi at idle with the vacuum reference line in place. While making the dyno runs, my pressure would linearly increase with the rpm's of my motor up to 46 psi or a bit more.
How is this possible with out positive pressure being present at the regulator diaphragm?
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
You might have some bad injectors. Read the plugs to see if any are showing signs of going lean.
Re: Underperforming 383
I should add.... While we were trying to richen the a/fr up high (it would go to 16:1 a/fr when the rpms went over 4000) I watched the fuel pressure gauge to make sure it wasn't due to fuel pressure loss. The fuel pressure actually climbed above its set point.
It is set to 44 psi with the vacuum port open, and idles at 39-40 psi at idle with the vacuum reference line in place. While making the dyno runs, my pressure would linearly increase with the rpm's of my motor up to 46 psi or a bit more.
How is this possible with out positive pressure being present at the regulator diaphragm?
It is set to 44 psi with the vacuum port open, and idles at 39-40 psi at idle with the vacuum reference line in place. While making the dyno runs, my pressure would linearly increase with the rpm's of my motor up to 46 psi or a bit more.
How is this possible with out positive pressure being present at the regulator diaphragm?
it could easily be a case of the injector being to small to keep up with demand,,your 32lb injector will max out at about 420hp,read the links use the calculator links provided,[/color][/b]
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php4
http://forum.grumpysperformance.com/...hp?f=55&t=1200
Last edited by grumpyvette; Sep 8, 2011 at 05:29 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
The photos didn't come out as well as I expected.. All of the plug insulators are rose colored.
I tested the cylinder pressures in this order: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 6, 4, 2, 1
The compression (engine cold, throttle closed) is as follows:
Cylinder:
1. 200, 180 (first cylinder tested was at 200, I checked it again after the other 7 cylinders and it was 180)
2. 175
3. 187
4. 175
5. 180
6. 176
7. 175
8. 176
I tested the cylinder pressures in this order: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 6, 4, 2, 1
The compression (engine cold, throttle closed) is as follows:
Cylinder:
1. 200, 180 (first cylinder tested was at 200, I checked it again after the other 7 cylinders and it was 180)
2. 175
3. 187
4. 175
5. 180
6. 176
7. 175
8. 176
Last edited by gixxer9; Sep 8, 2011 at 08:30 PM.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: batavia ohio
Car: 1992 z-28
Engine: 383 stealthram
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
my guess is still the exhaust....joeblue picked up .048 with his exhaust uncapped. that's approx. 45 to 50 ponies which would put easily at 380+.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
Hey gixx I think you may need more injector. you say you ran the fuel press at 49 psi with 32s. Well on a 355 I had 35s jacked up to 60psi and was maxed out at 410 rwhp. Your combo should do that with ease. Could be exhaust and fuel. Grumpy is right, 16 to1 is too lean for power.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
It would hit 16:1 wide open before the custom tune. It is now 13.0:1 +/- .2 throughout the powerband (I was thinking it was closer to 13.5:1, but I verified it is actually a little richer).
I saw the injector calculators, but was told that these 32 lb would actually flow enough for 475+ flywheel hp.
I saw the injector calculators, but was told that these 32 lb would actually flow enough for 475+ flywheel hp.
Last edited by gixxer9; Sep 9, 2011 at 07:20 PM.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
I saw the injector calculators, but was told that these 32 lb would actually flow enough for 475+ flywheel hp.[/quote]
Yeah that's straight flow with no bends or G-forces to overcome. I always size my injectors 1 step higher than what I calculate and sometimes I still may run out. At 430 chp you may be going static. That would put you at about 360 rwhp. Also a dyno is good for getting a good idea of what the car is doing but having a wideband on the car while going down the track can really dial a car in. 13.5 afr is a little lean for wide open throttle all the time. 12.8 to 1 is better and if you get some good air you won't go lean.
Yeah that's straight flow with no bends or G-forces to overcome. I always size my injectors 1 step higher than what I calculate and sometimes I still may run out. At 430 chp you may be going static. That would put you at about 360 rwhp. Also a dyno is good for getting a good idea of what the car is doing but having a wideband on the car while going down the track can really dial a car in. 13.5 afr is a little lean for wide open throttle all the time. 12.8 to 1 is better and if you get some good air you won't go lean.
Re: Underperforming 383
your plugs indicate a very lean condition, in the upper rpm range
Id try the calculator again, it suggests 410 -420hp is max with a 32 lb injector
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php4
Id try the calculator again, it suggests 410 -420hp is max with a 32 lb injector
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Underperforming 383
The converter may be too loose or flashing too high on the dyno to get the reading you want. Burnout91 made 397whp with the same combo but the converter was stock. He went to a 3500 stall and the whp dropped to 375whp. Make sure your base timing is set at 6*-8*. What headers are you using? Check my sig. You don't need duals.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 663
Likes: 1
From: Runnin' from the Reaper
Car: 91 B4C/91 RS 305
Engine: L98 and L03
Transmission: 2xTH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD/2.73 Open
Re: Underperforming 383
here's my 2 cents. On the 70s chevelles swapping from stock manifolds to headers was worth 90 hp easy. www.mufflex-performance.com should have what you need. i think last time I was poking around I saw a 4 1/2" catback. I know 4 inch for sure.
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 202
Likes: 1
From: williamstown,NJ
Car: 95 9C1,99 Sierra,90Sierra,00 sierra
Engine: TBI350,LM7,LT1,Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4,4L60e,4L60e,4L80e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt,14bolt,3:42,3:73,3:08,3:73.
Re: Underperforming 383
damn 90hp really?thats more then a cam and intake swap probably.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
your plugs indicate a very lean condition, in the upper rpm range
Id try the calculator again, it suggests 410 -420hp is max with a 32 lb injector
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php4
Id try the calculator again, it suggests 410 -420hp is max with a 32 lb injector
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php4
vincentZ28... My headers are SLP 1.75" w/o A.I.R. ceramic coated.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Underperforming 383
It's not all the exhaust is holding you back. Look at the WHP my car made with the full Exhaust system hooked up. You may have other issues. Don't believe that BS. What cam do you have? Tune you car with the full exhaust intact.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
Lol, funny. You would make more hp with a better exhaust system on your car and so would he. Not saying you can't make X amount or there is a max that you will hit with X size pipe but once you meet the max hp that a system can support without being a restriction then the more hp you make past that point the greater amount of hp you are giving up. I have been there and done that. Hell I have a 3" single on my BMW and it's just a lil 2.5 ltr 6. That 3" system is one of the things holding back some power. Just put a psi gauge on it and see for yourself.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
As noticeable as the loss of power was, it has to be at least 20 hp in the cat alone... The car would blaze the tires, and instantly redline, at any speed in first gear before the new cat. After the new cat, it would still spin from a roll, but not completely overcome the tires... It was more like a scratching, squawking spin (again, from a roll). Matting it from a stand would still annihilate the tires after the cat, but when I hit third it would just scratch (it would continue to spin until I let off, or hit OD, before the cat). Definate loss of torque and power. It worsens as the revs climb.
However, even with the power loss from the cat, there is still something else wrong here.
I appreciate all of the insight and advice from everyone, thank you!
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
Yup, been there done that. Back in the day when my Z28 had just a bolt on 350 and was my daily driver I had to worry about the smog testing so I ran dual cats with a 3" Dynomax catback and lost some of my torque and topend. I later put a 2.5" dual system on it retuned it (carb) and it was a big diff. Just look at all the guys that are fast NA, and you will see a trend. That 350 was running 11.70s back then (95').
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Underperforming 383
Ok! Well I have a dual cat set up and he has a single cat set up. That will make a difference in power but he still have other issues besides the exhaust. Proper timing, Valve springs, Cam not degreed properly, Wrong plugs, Weak fuel pump.
This is a long shot but did you disconnect the EST wire before you set the timing? Some people forget to do that.
This is a long shot but did you disconnect the EST wire before you set the timing? Some people forget to do that.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Underperforming 383
I agree, there are other things that isn't right. He should right down all the things that could be holding him back then go through the checklist. Start with the free/low buck stuff first.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
Ok! Well I have a dual cat set up and he has a single cat set up. That will make a difference in power but he still have other issues besides the exhaust. Proper timing, Valve springs, Cam not degreed properly, Wrong plugs, Weak fuel pump.
This is a long shot but did you disconnect the EST wire before you set the timing? Some people forget to do that.
This is a long shot but did you disconnect the EST wire before you set the timing? Some people forget to do that.
Thanks for all of the advice! I don't need my hair to fall out any faster than it already is!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Underperforming 383
One more thing. Did you port the HSR? From what I understand they are not that good if you don't port them. You need to change the Throttle Body to a 58mm. 383cu+ likes it and your set up should be over 500 fwhp. Mine is right at 480fwhp with a smaller cam and heads that yours.
Last edited by VincentZ28; Sep 13, 2011 at 09:14 AM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 6.2
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 4.10
Re: Underperforming 383
Interesting, I have not ported the HSR. I've considered purchasing a 58mm TB, but have not as of yet.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Underperforming 383
Was this a mustang dyno?
Was the converter locked on the dyno?
Did it not make any more power with richer mixture? IE 12.5-13.0 to 1 range Timing seems high with AFR 195 heads. What plugs you using? .750 reach? What gap?
Did you datalog the dyno run? Whats your injector pulsewidths?
Was the converter locked on the dyno?
Did it not make any more power with richer mixture? IE 12.5-13.0 to 1 range Timing seems high with AFR 195 heads. What plugs you using? .750 reach? What gap?
Did you datalog the dyno run? Whats your injector pulsewidths?











