closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Canada, C.B.S. NL
Car: 83 c10, 2015 silverado
Engine: 454, 5.3
Transmission: Turbo 35o, 6l80
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3:23
closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
im building a 400sbc for my z28 and im wondering if these heads will work there a 64 cc camel hump head with acc holes and a closed chamber i know i have to drill steam holes but will the cr be to high for regular unleaded?
the engine has stock dished pistons thanks!
the engine has stock dished pistons thanks!
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,874
Likes: 2,431
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
If they have the bolt holes, they're not really a "closed" chamber.
They will work. On a stock 400 short block, they should give around 9½:1.
They will work. On a stock 400 short block, they should give around 9½:1.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Canada, C.B.S. NL
Car: 83 c10, 2015 silverado
Engine: 454, 5.3
Transmission: Turbo 35o, 6l80
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3:23
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
thats good news, the casting number is 370 cant find much info on them, 1.94 1.50 valves
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: San Tan Valley, AZ
Car: 92 25th anniversary edition
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 2.73's
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
my advice would be to have the combustion chambers measured to see if they are indeed 64cc's. I can't find any small block head with the casting number ending in 370. Also do the math on your static compression it varies with piston dome or dish cc, how much the piston sits above or below the deck, head gasket thickness, etc... I had a 400 with flat top pistons at zero deck height and a felpro gasket with a 041 casting head and came to 11 to 1 compression. Always good to check.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,874
Likes: 2,431
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
370 - 3973370 - was a service replacement head for the 69-70 350 4-bbl. Similar to the 492.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Canada, C.B.S. NL
Car: 83 c10, 2015 silverado
Engine: 454, 5.3
Transmission: Turbo 35o, 6l80
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3:23
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
heres the heads, fresh rebuild, spacers under the springs mild porting.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Grizzly Flats, CA
Car: 86 Camaro, IROC springs & bars
Engine: Mild 350,Q-jet,headers
Transmission: M-21, 12#flywheel
Axle/Gears: 98 7.5, 3.73 torsen.
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
If I remember correctly they are 68cc heads, 64cc had a small quench area next to the spark plug, you can see yours are laid down slightly by the plug.
Still good old heads ether way! And I could always be wrong, just another senior moment.
Still good old heads ether way! And I could always be wrong, just another senior moment.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Canada, C.B.S. NL
Car: 83 c10, 2015 silverado
Engine: 454, 5.3
Transmission: Turbo 35o, 6l80
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3:23
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
the internet says there 64cc, doesn't matter to me what they are lol, got bored so i drilled the steam holes while im waiting to get the block back from the machine shop.
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Grizzly Flats, CA
Car: 86 Camaro, IROC springs & bars
Engine: Mild 350,Q-jet,headers
Transmission: M-21, 12#flywheel
Axle/Gears: 98 7.5, 3.73 torsen.
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
Never worry about 1cc especially on stock stuff, they just aren't that accurate (unfortunately), like I've said elsewhere run a straight edge along the rocker studs or the edge of the valve stems, you think there all straight- aint so.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,874
Likes: 2,431
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
they just aren't that accurate (unfortunately)

Doesn't matter how inaccurate "aren't that accurate" is meant to be; most stock stuff, from the 70s most of all, doesn't even make it that far.
Pour em and measure em, and then they just are what they are, no matter what drivel about "specs" is posted on the Internet.
If they're REALLY just WAY off, like more than 3cc or so, then it's time to figure out what to do. But with what you're doing, they're probably fine. I'd say if they're within 2cc they're close "enough" for most street uses, and within 1.5cc they're better than most.Then, think about it... if they were a little different, what would you do about it, anyway? There comes a time when it all turns into just a bunch of armchair beer talk.
I'd be willing to bet that there's more difference in the deck clearance from cyl to cyl than that. Stock stuff is that way... once you get one error cleaned up to the point that it is swamped by the next one, there's ALWAYS a "next one". You're just playing the game of "measure with micrometer, mark with chalk line, cut with chain saw" anyway. There's SO MANY ways stock stuff is "off", you wouldn't believe it until you actually try to get it all RIGHT. It's scary sometimes that some motors even RUN at all.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Canada, C.B.S. NL
Car: 83 c10, 2015 silverado
Engine: 454, 5.3
Transmission: Turbo 35o, 6l80
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3:23
Re: closed chamber heads - 400 sbc
got my camand lifters today, and my block back from the machine shop threw my heads on top just to tease myself... takes a-lot to get me excited but im there!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mickeyruder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 2, 2015 02:45 PM






and another source says 67 cc 
