EFI Fuel sending unit return line
Thread Starter
Junior Member



Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Car: 84 MSE TransAm #22
Engine: SBC 350 +.060, Holley Sniper EFI
Transmission: 1991 T5 WC
Axle/Gears: Eaton TrueTrac in Dana44 case- 3.31
EFI Fuel sending unit return line
I am currently in the process of switching from factory carb to the Holley Sniper EFI. Since my ’84 TA did not have the EFI tank I have purchased a new unit for an ’89 5.7L and the sending unit to install the intake fuel pump. I also purchased the Walbro pump kit 5CA400HP (255ltr) and 20' of Earls 3/8” Vapor Guard EFI hose & clamps. I will be using the existing 3/8" stock hard line (orig feed line) for the return... my concern is with the sending unit return line is only 5/16”. I have heard that the return line should be an equal size as the inlet or there would/could be pressure buildup especially when the tank is full (since that return goes to the bottom of the tank).
Your thoughts
Your thoughts
Thread Starter
Junior Member



Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Car: 84 MSE TransAm #22
Engine: SBC 350 +.060, Holley Sniper EFI
Transmission: 1991 T5 WC
Axle/Gears: Eaton TrueTrac in Dana44 case- 3.31
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
After looking at the sending unit I see that there is a 3/8” line for the tank pressure valve ( the one that is mounted above the axle). I was thinking of converting this with an added 3/8” hard tube to the bottom of the tank and using the smaller diameter vapor line (after removing the rollover check valve) for the pressure valve. This of course would mean that the vapor canister would need to be unused/removed and the 5/16” sending unit return line would need to be capped off. (Note - all emission hardware has been removed due to damaged & inoperable components and connectors over its 34 years of operation). This is not a daily driver and is will be used for fun & show.
Your thoughts?
Your thoughts?
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
I edited my post because I reread your original post and I see you do plan to use an in tank pump
Last edited by OrangeBird; Jul 30, 2018 at 01:18 PM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member



Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Car: 84 MSE TransAm #22
Engine: SBC 350 +.060, Holley Sniper EFI
Transmission: 1991 T5 WC
Axle/Gears: Eaton TrueTrac in Dana44 case- 3.31
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
TTT (to the top)
Ideas on this anyone?
Ideas on this anyone?
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,255
Likes: 427
From: Portland, OR
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
5/16 is plenty big. We don't upgrade 5/16 supply/return lines till we are going over ~600 HP. It will flow what you need.
GD
GD
Thread Starter
Junior Member



Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Car: 84 MSE TransAm #22
Engine: SBC 350 +.060, Holley Sniper EFI
Transmission: 1991 T5 WC
Axle/Gears: Eaton TrueTrac in Dana44 case- 3.31
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
General Disorder ~
Thanks for the input. I have just heard and read many that say with all the bends and small barb ends on the 5/16" line that it is just asking for trouble (back pressure). The ID of the return line at the barb end is only .225 dia. Would it be better to cut off the barb and put on a Earls compression fitting that converts from a 3/8 hose (orig stock hard line feed line) to a 5/16 full dia on the sending unit? I don't think I will get a good seal clamping the Earl's Vapor guard 3/8"tubing to the 5/16" barb.
Yours and anyone else thoughts are very welcome
Thanks for the input. I have just heard and read many that say with all the bends and small barb ends on the 5/16" line that it is just asking for trouble (back pressure). The ID of the return line at the barb end is only .225 dia. Would it be better to cut off the barb and put on a Earls compression fitting that converts from a 3/8 hose (orig stock hard line feed line) to a 5/16 full dia on the sending unit? I don't think I will get a good seal clamping the Earl's Vapor guard 3/8"tubing to the 5/16" barb.
Yours and anyone else thoughts are very welcome
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 712
Likes: 8
From: Elyria, Ohio
Car: 82 Z-28
Engine: Built 406ci
Transmission: 700R4 w/3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Torsen Posi, Moser Axles
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
I converted over to EFI 3 years ago and installed the Holley Terminator system and like you, I put a new tank, along with the in-tank pump. I didn't eliminate the vapor canister since the fuel system is still a closed system and I didn't want to have the tank pressurize, which is what happened, so I vent my canister just below the steering box and stuck a small import style filter on the end. I didn't change any of the sizes when it comes to fuel lines and I have never had any issues with the car running short on fuel pressure or volume.
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 413
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
I vent my canister just below the steering box and stuck a small import style filter on the end. I didn't change any of the sizes when it comes to fuel lines and I have never had any issues with the car running short on fuel pressure or volume.
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,255
Likes: 427
From: Portland, OR
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: EFI Fuel sending unit return line
You can do some research on the google if you don't believe me, but your 1/4" ID line will easily support 500+ HP with a quality, high volume fuel pump. You are worrying for nothing. Just run it. This is not a low pressure carbureted application. With EFI the fuel line sizing is much less of an issue. I guarantee that the orifice in the pressure regulator is much smaller than 1/4"
GD
GD
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RaverRacerX
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
3
Apr 25, 2011 02:08 AM
pizza_guy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
2
Oct 30, 2006 10:34 PM








