L98 vs LS1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Sweden (malmö)
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI 350 sd
Transmission: A4
L98 vs LS1
What chanse does a -91 GTA 350aut with (full exhaust k&n filter, ported plenum, afpr, chip and shiftkit) have against a stock -99 trans am LS1 aut. The GTA driver is a realy *** driver, th other one i dont now.......
I hope the GTA spanks him but i think its gonne be the opposit...
I hope the GTA spanks him but i think its gonne be the opposit... The GTA might have a slight advantage off the line, but after 30 or so it won't be pretty. That LS1 will spank that GTA bad. Even if the LS1 owner can't drive, there is too much of a power difference to overcome.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
to bad its the fbody version of the L98. i have all those aforementioned mods (except headers) on my 89 Corvette and regularly beat stock or lightly modded LS1s.
hp isnt everything... ive got about 50+ less RWHP than a stock LS1 but i get to the end of the quarter quicker.
Even if the LS1 owner can't drive, there is too much of a power difference to overcome
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: clarksville, tn
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
i agree with tpivette, hp isnt everything. i raced a ls1 z28 6 spd that has a few little mods and i only lost by 5 cars, thats without full exhaust, afpr, and all those good things. depending on some conditions and how well the gta launches, it could be close for the first 1/8th, but after that im giving it to the ls1. i wouldnt feel too bad, thats pretty good when a little ole' l98 is keeping up with a new ls1. i am giving this one to the ls1 still, but i think it could be farely close off the line. anyways, i do hope the gta wins though, liked to see another win for the 3rd gen. crowd.
BTW, my car is a 91 formula 350, which has a slight weight advantage over the gta
BTW, my car is a 91 formula 350, which has a slight weight advantage over the gta
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
My 98 TA is WAY faster than my IROC was when it had full exhaust, chip, afpr, intake mods, free mods, etc. WAY faster. At least a full second in the 1/4. Those 2.77 gears didn't help the IROC much though.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
My buddy has a 98 LS1 with SLP cat back, wisper lid, and pypertech programing. We race quite often just for the fun of it. This is how it always goes.
I take about a half car then he is even then his car shifts into second and Oh MY G0D does he go flying by(like I am parked) he is now about 4 cars in front of me. He stays that way till the end of the 1/4. I will have to video tape it sometime. He really does go sreaming by.
If you want to beat him there is an easy thing to do, take the air out of his tires!
Brian
I take about a half car then he is even then his car shifts into second and Oh MY G0D does he go flying by(like I am parked) he is now about 4 cars in front of me. He stays that way till the end of the 1/4. I will have to video tape it sometime. He really does go sreaming by.
If you want to beat him there is an easy thing to do, take the air out of his tires!
Brian
the LS1 top end is incredible, they just never stop pulling all the way to redline. L98 has incredible low end torque, but after that its all over. I wouldnt suggest you ever race an ls1 from a roll or anywhere over 50 mph, you will get creamed bad, real bad!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 25THRSS
the LS1 top end is incredible, they just never stop pulling all the way to redline. L98 has incredible low end torque, but after that its all over. I wouldnt suggest you ever race an ls1 from a roll or anywhere over 50 mph, you will get creamed bad, real bad!
the LS1 top end is incredible, they just never stop pulling all the way to redline. L98 has incredible low end torque, but after that its all over. I wouldnt suggest you ever race an ls1 from a roll or anywhere over 50 mph, you will get creamed bad, real bad!
Brian
who would win
Sorry to break this to you but the ole L98 just aint gonna keep up. Like other's have said from the start you will get a jump on him but after that it will be all over. With your mods you might pull a 2 car length but it wont be for long. goodluck.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 25THRSS
89blackgta, what mods do you have? If you can kep with an ls1 up to 130 that is very respectable and you deserve a lot of credit for that
89blackgta, what mods do you have? If you can kep with an ls1 up to 130 that is very respectable and you deserve a lot of credit for that
Brian
keeping with an ls1 on the top end is not an easy task because i know from first hand experience those things pull like a raped ape up top
youve got a hell of a car there to be able to do that, good job
youve got a hell of a car there to be able to do that, good job Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 25THRSS
i just saw your car traps at 97, when most ls1's will trap over 105 easy
oh well, nice car anyways
i just saw your car traps at 97, when most ls1's will trap over 105 easy
oh well, nice car anyways Brian
higher trap speeds dont always guarantee a win in the 1/4, i was just saying that the person with a higher trap speed usually has more hp and would win from a roll, i didnt say you were lying, usually the car with the most power will just pull away more and more the faster you go, and ls1 are awesome up top, thats all i was saying, if your gta can stay with an ls1 from a 60 roll to 130 thats awesome and a very good acomplishment
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Thats what I thought I just needed to check. But back to the shifting, I think that if he were to manually thow it down he would have walked away easy. He is kind of a puss with his car, he just doesnt want to hurt it in any way. And he knows that he can beat me at any speed so I dont blame him for taking it easy.
Back to the original post. Are you actually going to race a LS1 or are you just wanting to know?
Brian
Back to the original post. Are you actually going to race a LS1 or are you just wanting to know?
Brian
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Sweden (malmö)
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI 350 sd
Transmission: A4
With the mods the GTA has i should be a high 13 car with a good driver, and the Ls1 should be a mid 13 car stock with aut, the newer ones -01 and up are a little bit quicker i think.
So if the LS1 guy drives bad and the L98 good........ but then again if the L98 drives bad and a LB9 good..............
So if the LS1 guy drives bad and the L98 good........ but then again if the L98 drives bad and a LB9 good..............
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by DOOSKI
With the mods the GTA has i should be a high 13 car with a good driver, and the Ls1 should be a mid 13 car stock with aut, the newer ones -01 and up are a little bit quicker i think.
So if the LS1 guy drives bad and the L98 good........ but then again if the L98 drives bad and a LB9 good..............
With the mods the GTA has i should be a high 13 car with a good driver, and the Ls1 should be a mid 13 car stock with aut, the newer ones -01 and up are a little bit quicker i think.
So if the LS1 guy drives bad and the L98 good........ but then again if the L98 drives bad and a LB9 good..............
Brian
Originally posted by tpivette89
to bad its the fbody version of the L98. i have all those aforementioned mods (except headers) on my 89 Corvette and regularly beat stock or lightly modded LS1s.
hp isnt everything... ive got about 50+ less RWHP than a stock LS1 but i get to the end of the quarter quicker.
to bad its the fbody version of the L98. i have all those aforementioned mods (except headers) on my 89 Corvette and regularly beat stock or lightly modded LS1s.
hp isnt everything... ive got about 50+ less RWHP than a stock LS1 but i get to the end of the quarter quicker.
Race him to the 60' mark. That should make you look good. An L98 is strong, but an LS1 is a bit much for one. Of course anything can happen, but the probability is that the LS1 will take your GTA. That being said, a GTA with your mods wouldn't be any slouch.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Is your friend with the LS1 really smart about cars, cause if u wanna win, like smallwood said, just make it a short run, like go to 50mph and then shut off
After that though, goodbye!
Why is it though that L98 are automatically assumed to win in the low-end vs and LS1, dont they have about the same torque, yet the LS1 has 100 more HP.
Either way, if u wanna BEAT that LS1, get a Intercooled Procharger, hehe.
Can u tape the race!?!
After that though, goodbye!Why is it though that L98 are automatically assumed to win in the low-end vs and LS1, dont they have about the same torque, yet the LS1 has 100 more HP.
Either way, if u wanna BEAT that LS1, get a Intercooled Procharger, hehe.
Can u tape the race!?!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by GTATransAM
Is your friend with the LS1 really smart about cars, cause if u wanna win, like smallwood said, just make it a short run, like go to 50mph and then shut off
After that though, goodbye!
Why is it though that L98 are automatically assumed to win in the low-end vs and LS1, dont they have about the same torque, yet the LS1 has 100 more HP.
Either way, if u wanna BEAT that LS1, get a Intercooled Procharger, hehe.
Can u tape the race!?!
Is your friend with the LS1 really smart about cars, cause if u wanna win, like smallwood said, just make it a short run, like go to 50mph and then shut off
After that though, goodbye!Why is it though that L98 are automatically assumed to win in the low-end vs and LS1, dont they have about the same torque, yet the LS1 has 100 more HP.
Either way, if u wanna BEAT that LS1, get a Intercooled Procharger, hehe.
Can u tape the race!?!
Like I stated above, when I race my buddy I am only ahead(and not by alot, he spins more though) for a short while.
Brian
Originally posted by 89blackGTA
Thank you. I am the only one(besides you) that has said the LS1s will be right there from the start.
Like I stated above, when I race my buddy I am only ahead(and not by alot, he spins more though) for a short while.
Brian
Thank you. I am the only one(besides you) that has said the LS1s will be right there from the start.
Like I stated above, when I race my buddy I am only ahead(and not by alot, he spins more though) for a short while.
Brian
im with you both, I mean my friends sister has a 98 Z28 and I drive it alot and it moves from the get go, with good traction the L98 won't stand a chance...even if the car spins the tires as soon as it hit 30-40 the LS1 is gonna lunge ahead and keep pulling. I mean other than that unless the L98 has AFR heads, gears, a built tranny, an aftermarket converter and slicks...then I think the L98 will prevail but until then, newer LS1's are going to be a problem...I mean with LT1's, honestly, they have not posted much of a problem for me. I can take alot of them, I have raced one LS1 and that was my friends Yellow Anniversary Edition running 13.1 ( headers, borla cat back, nitto 555r's, and programmer ) and he killed me!.....AARON
Originally posted by Vicious 88 GTA
I have raced one LS1 and that was my friends Yellow Anniversary Edition running 13.1 ( headers, borla cat back, nitto 555r's, and programmer ) and he killed me!.....AARON
I have raced one LS1 and that was my friends Yellow Anniversary Edition running 13.1 ( headers, borla cat back, nitto 555r's, and programmer ) and he killed me!.....AARON
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Man LS1 are in a whole other level for me, im not even gonna worry about them now. LS1s to us thirdgens is like what Ferraris and Lamborghinis are to LS1, am i right? Well maybe not from a stand still, but from rolled, LS1 would get raped by either one. And im talking about the Diablo and the F-50.
hehe we all know...but this guy weighs about 300+lbs and he was spinning the Nittos, they are worn out bad, he got some MT Slicks and hoping to get into the 12's next run and he is going to throw in a vigilante stall..AARON
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Well the LS1 can be ALOT more expensive than a thirdgen too. Whats the average price for thirden, like about $5000? The LS1 is easily over $10000 on average, right?
Thats at least double, but u right, the f-50 and diable, more than 3 fold the price of a brand new LS1.
Well, anyways, my point is take that $5000 price difference from thirdgen and LS1, and we will be right up there with mods.
Thats at least double, but u right, the f-50 and diable, more than 3 fold the price of a brand new LS1.
Well, anyways, my point is take that $5000 price difference from thirdgen and LS1, and we will be right up there with mods.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by GTATransAM
Well the LS1 can be ALOT more expensive than a thirdgen too. Whats the average price for thirden, like about $5000? The LS1 is easily over $10000 on average, right?
Thats at least double, but u right, the f-50 and diable, more than 3 fold the price of a brand new LS1.
Well, anyways, my point is take that $5000 price difference from thirdgen and LS1, and we will be right up there with mods.
Well the LS1 can be ALOT more expensive than a thirdgen too. Whats the average price for thirden, like about $5000? The LS1 is easily over $10000 on average, right?
Thats at least double, but u right, the f-50 and diable, more than 3 fold the price of a brand new LS1.
Well, anyways, my point is take that $5000 price difference from thirdgen and LS1, and we will be right up there with mods.
Brian
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
I got my 98 TA for $12,900 with only 25k miles on it. It's mint. I haven't seen a deal like that since I bought it, though.
As for modding, the thing I like about modding the LS1 vs. the L98 is that their are guys running 10's N/A w/ cam and head swaps, stock bottom end motors. Some running low 11's N/A with cam and bolt ons=STOCK HEADS!!! They just have so much potential it's crazy. And they go fast and work well as daily drivers too.
To take an L98 into the 10's NA is tough, you'd prob have to rebuild the bottom end (engines are at least 11 yrs. old now), which starts digging into that 5k less price you were talking about, considering machining and a good rotating assembly will eat up about $2400 or more of it. And that stock TPI is NOT going to get you there. But, parts like headers and stuff (bolt-ons) for the LS1 are more expensive too, so it does take more money to mod them.
Both cars are haunted by the weak drivetrain though. 10 bolts suck. You're going to spend the same amount of money on either to get a solid driveshaft and rearend. The trannies need some work too, to handle 10's. And suspension parts for both cars are about the same price.
Both generations have their pros and cons. I love both my cars.
As for modding, the thing I like about modding the LS1 vs. the L98 is that their are guys running 10's N/A w/ cam and head swaps, stock bottom end motors. Some running low 11's N/A with cam and bolt ons=STOCK HEADS!!! They just have so much potential it's crazy. And they go fast and work well as daily drivers too.
To take an L98 into the 10's NA is tough, you'd prob have to rebuild the bottom end (engines are at least 11 yrs. old now), which starts digging into that 5k less price you were talking about, considering machining and a good rotating assembly will eat up about $2400 or more of it. And that stock TPI is NOT going to get you there. But, parts like headers and stuff (bolt-ons) for the LS1 are more expensive too, so it does take more money to mod them.
Both cars are haunted by the weak drivetrain though. 10 bolts suck. You're going to spend the same amount of money on either to get a solid driveshaft and rearend. The trannies need some work too, to handle 10's. And suspension parts for both cars are about the same price.
Both generations have their pros and cons. I love both my cars.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
If you're straight about your times, I'm convinced you're car is a freak. I've seen numerous L98 Vettes with lots more done than you that couldn't claim your times
the main reason why i can beat LS1s is in my launch. normally they get 2.0 to 2.2 60fts when im clocking high 1.8s. from a roll, however, i stand no chance
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by smallwood
The launch, oh the damned launch. There is the reason I wouldn't consider a well tuned L98 an easy kill to about 45mph. First and second are useless past half throttle on the street in my '02.
The launch, oh the damned launch. There is the reason I wouldn't consider a well tuned L98 an easy kill to about 45mph. First and second are useless past half throttle on the street in my '02.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael, CA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI (L98)
Transmission: 700RJunk
L98 vs. LS1? Hello! I don't really see why people are even considering this. It isn't even a race. An L98 corvette is a different story because they're light, and with the way they're set up, they respond very well to mods. I know
. The L98 might keep up off the line, but its gonna get walked after that, unless its had some work done on the inside of the motor. I mean the LT1 vs. L98 is usually interesting and competitive, because those LT1's really aren't "all that". My friend has a '96 Z28 and I've ridden in it. I wasn't that impressed with it. It would be a good race between it and my GTA....
. The L98 might keep up off the line, but its gonna get walked after that, unless its had some work done on the inside of the motor. I mean the LT1 vs. L98 is usually interesting and competitive, because those LT1's really aren't "all that". My friend has a '96 Z28 and I've ridden in it. I wasn't that impressed with it. It would be a good race between it and my GTA.... Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Ya LT1s are considered to be less lethal for us thirdgens, but an LS1 is a whole different story. But theres only technically 25 hp difference from stock LT1 to LS1, or is there maybemore, and its one of those GM underated, classified BS?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by GTATransAM
Ya LT1s are considered to be less lethal for us thirdgens, but an LS1 is a whole different story. But theres only technically 25 hp difference from stock LT1 to LS1, or is there maybemore, and its one of those GM underated, classified BS?
Ya LT1s are considered to be less lethal for us thirdgens, but an LS1 is a whole different story. But theres only technically 25 hp difference from stock LT1 to LS1, or is there maybemore, and its one of those GM underated, classified BS?
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4
good ole chevy with the underrating......
saw a dyno in some car magazine...(forget which one it was a long time ago) of a LS1 z28. the z put down 300 rwhp...
saw a dyno in some car magazine...(forget which one it was a long time ago) of a LS1 z28. the z put down 300 rwhp...
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Are the thirdgens, like the GTA or Iroc-Z underated as well? I mean the whole purpose of it is to make the Corvette look good, and they did have the L98 Corvette then, so did they use any schemes like that as well on our cars? Or is the HP figures pretty much what it is?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
I doubt any 3rdgen cars are underrated, because most of the time, it seems like Chevy underrates a motor when it gets close to or over 1hp/ci. Like these:
- '69 csb 302 - rated 290hp, really over 360hp
- '70 csb 350 (LT1) - rated 360hp, really about 400hp
- '67 cbb 427 - rated 435hp, really about 460hp
- '63 csb 327 - rated 325hp, really about 370hp
Yea, these are about 20 years older than any 3rdgen motor, but the same seems to apply today. As soon as the power numbers begin to approach the 1hp per cubic inch, they start to downplay the numbers, probably for insurance reasons. But since the highest HP number in the 3rdgen era was only 245hp in a 350ci motor, i doubt they were underated.
- '69 csb 302 - rated 290hp, really over 360hp
- '70 csb 350 (LT1) - rated 360hp, really about 400hp
- '67 cbb 427 - rated 435hp, really about 460hp
- '63 csb 327 - rated 325hp, really about 370hp
Yea, these are about 20 years older than any 3rdgen motor, but the same seems to apply today. As soon as the power numbers begin to approach the 1hp per cubic inch, they start to downplay the numbers, probably for insurance reasons. But since the highest HP number in the 3rdgen era was only 245hp in a 350ci motor, i doubt they were underated.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 97 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Probably the only 3rd gen that was underrated was the TTA. Rated at 250hp but actually making around 300hp.
The red SS that went 12.96 GMHTP tested a couple of years ago put down 321hp to the wheels! Thats the most I've ever heard of a bone stock LS1 car making.
The red SS that went 12.96 GMHTP tested a couple of years ago put down 321hp to the wheels! Thats the most I've ever heard of a bone stock LS1 car making.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Those damn insurance companies, they **** up everything. Well it can also work to your advantage then. U line up next to someone who has a car making 250HP, and u have your TTA, which in his mind should have 250HP. But like u said, its underated, making maybe 300HP, and just like that he gets smoked, and suprised.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 8
From: Santa Monica, CA
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
the last ls1's in the SS cars were rated at 330hp or so, and 360 ft/lbs.......many of them dyno at 350 at the rear wheel and around 380 ft/lbs
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
350 at the wheel, mother of ***, thats alot of HP, and a huge underated BS. What is that then about 380HP at the crank!?! Man those last LS1s are monsters.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Air_Adam
I doubt any 3rdgen cars are underrated, because most of the time, it seems like Chevy underrates a motor when it gets close to or over 1hp/ci. Like these:
- '69 csb 302 - rated 290hp, really over 360hp
- '70 csb 350 (LT1) - rated 360hp, really about 400hp
- '67 cbb 427 - rated 435hp, really about 460hp
- '63 csb 327 - rated 325hp, really about 370hp
Yea, these are about 20 years older than any 3rdgen motor, but the same seems to apply today. As soon as the power numbers begin to approach the 1hp per cubic inch, they start to downplay the numbers, probably for insurance reasons. But since the highest HP number in the 3rdgen era was only 245hp in a 350ci motor, i doubt they were underated.
I doubt any 3rdgen cars are underrated, because most of the time, it seems like Chevy underrates a motor when it gets close to or over 1hp/ci. Like these:
- '69 csb 302 - rated 290hp, really over 360hp
- '70 csb 350 (LT1) - rated 360hp, really about 400hp
- '67 cbb 427 - rated 435hp, really about 460hp
- '63 csb 327 - rated 325hp, really about 370hp
Yea, these are about 20 years older than any 3rdgen motor, but the same seems to apply today. As soon as the power numbers begin to approach the 1hp per cubic inch, they start to downplay the numbers, probably for insurance reasons. But since the highest HP number in the 3rdgen era was only 245hp in a 350ci motor, i doubt they were underated.
another words no accesories, dyno headers, no mufflers, a dyno intake, where the new rating now net puts the whole motor together as it would be in the car?



