Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

v6 vs v6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #1  
fyrechikyn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
v6 vs v6

who would win in a race against a v6 thirdgen and a v6 97 mustang? also how fast are fourth gen v6 camaros?
Reply
Old May 13, 2003 | 11:35 PM
  #2  
Jokerman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Schaumburg, Illinois
Engine: slowtacular L03 305
Transmission: slushem 700r4
You will loose. The 4th gen f-bodies had much more powerful v6's and ran in the 15's. I believe the SN95 mustangs (like the 97) also ran in the 15's with a 6 although some years are quicker than others, both cars will be much faster than your 3.1 or 2.8.
Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 02:14 AM
  #3  
silverstreakII's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
yeah seriously, some of the newer stang 6's are like 230 horse. i dont know about 97's, but still, theyre faster than your six.
Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
now if it were a TTA thirdgen which is a v6 but has just a slight advantage with a turbo , then it wins by alot :hail:
Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #5  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Jokerman
You will loose. The 4th gen f-bodies had much more powerful v6's and ran in the 15's. I believe the SN95 mustangs (like the 97) also ran in the 15's with a 6 although some years are quicker than others, both cars will be much faster than your 3.1 or 2.8.
know the 96 mustangs are slow
the v6 has not power what so ever
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 04:51 PM
  #6  
Abel Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
97 Mustangs ARE NOT 15 second cars. They have 150 hp and they run 17s, I believe. 98 was a changing year. They got...190 hp, I believe...
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #7  
Abel Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
I actually plan on racing a 97 Mustang with the Crown Victoria once I get it running better. And get a couple of upgrades. I'm also going to suggest that he let someone ride with him. He doesn't know much about racing. Let's see...

Crown Vic-- 3800 lbs, 4050 lbs with me in it.
140 hp/250 lbs-ft
Mustang-- 3350 lbs, 3450 lbs with him in it.
150 hp/??? lbs-ft

Got to find a big guy and get 20-30 more hp for the LTD. He's got big speakers, I think...


Which one of those cars is yours?
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 06:13 PM
  #8  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
Okay, from 1994-1998 the V6 Mustang had 150 hp, and were 16-17 second cars.

From 1999-2003 the Mustang had 190 hp (Might have been 193, but i am not sure) and were 15-16 second cars.

From 1993-1995 the V6 camaro had the 3.4 and were 16-17 second cars.

From 1996-2002 The Camaro had 200 hp and were 15-16 second cars.

I am not sure on the V6 thirdgens, but I would assume no better than high 16s, pobably 17s.
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #9  
Abel Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
He's got it. Ignore my post and look at his.
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #10  
buzz12586's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5 spd
Are 4th gen v6's really that quick. I raced my friend in one. we are both 5 speeds and I have a 305 TBI. We raced from a light and I was ahead by like 2 cars at 45.
Reply
Old May 17, 2003 | 01:44 AM
  #11  
Abel Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Torque.
Reply
Old May 17, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #12  
87WS6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 10
From: Texas
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
The V-6 4th gens are not that fast. Faster than a 6 cyl thirdgen yes. Faster than much else no. They are quick and peppy for what they are. But not much more than that.

If you plan on racing one in a thirdgen 6 cyl be preppared with extra lube. You will get it up the butt pretty hard.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 12:34 AM
  #13  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
96+ fourthgen V6's run just a hair under what a 305 TPI thirdgen runs... I bet you could take a pre-99 mustang v6 though... they only put out 160 Hp and weighed a lot more than a thirdgen... granted the '93-'95 fourthgen had only 160 also, but it weighed less than those mustangs.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 05:12 PM
  #14  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
96+ fourthgen V6's run just a hair under what a 305 TPI thirdgen runs... I bet you could take a pre-99 mustang v6 though... they only put out 160 Hp and weighed a lot more than a thirdgen... granted the '93-'95 fourthgen had only 160 also, but it weighed less than those mustangs.
I always thought the mustang was less then the camaro for weight

if I remember right a 98 mustang GT was only a hair above 3000 something like 3046 lbs or so
while the thirdgen stock is what?3300+ in stock trim?
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #15  
SFX099's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Car: '95 Trans- Am
Engine: 5.7, Baby
Transmission: Auto
This is some stuff I found form kelleys blue book to give some ideas.

98 Mustang V-6 5-speed
150hp@4000rpm
215tq@2750rpm
Curb Weight 3065lbs

98 Mustang GT 5-speed
225hp@4750rpm
290tq@3500rpm
Curb Weight 3278lbs

92 Camaro RS V-6 5-speed
140hp@4400rpm
180tq@3600rpm
Curb Weight 3105lbs

92 Camaro Z-28 350 Auto
245hp@4400rpm
345tq@3200rpm
Curb Weight 3273lbs
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.