Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

mustang 5.0 stick vs my t/a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
mustang 5.0 stick vs my t/a

I gots a 83 t/a automatic. and my friend has a 86 I think mustang 5.0 stick. Who you think will win? Both cars are stock. I was thinking about asking him to race.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
87irocz350's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: MNT.Washington, KY
Car: 87 Iroc
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-5 3.42's
Your dead
Thats really all there is too it. Your gonna get killed. I wouldn't race him untill you started some mods. But, go into a little more detail about your cars. Gears, Engine model..etc.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #3  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
hey

I gots L69 motor..190 horse? Im not sure of gears n such. Not much into cars...Im pretty sure his is a 86 gt or something..trunk not hatch if that helps????
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
jocww's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
how long have u had your car
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 07:05 PM
  #5  
84'Camaroboy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!!!
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 305 L69
Transmission: 5 spd
sorry to add to what u have already been told but im pretty sure ur gonna get owned i wouldnt race unless u have even some small mods and he is stock but hey the good ol L69 does good so give it a try if ur up to it!:lala:
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #6  
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Car: 92Z28, 99SS, 83Z28 & 86GTA
Engine: 421, LS1, 327Turbo & 383
Transmission: T-56, 4L60E, T5 & 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4:10, 3:42, 2:73 & 3:27
I'd have to say the stang too, sorry.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 07:41 PM
  #7  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
Is the reason he'll beat me cuz its stick? The 5.0 and camaros/T/As basically have the same engine dont they?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 07:43 PM
  #8  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
1986 wasnt a very good year for the Mustang. They had worse intakes and heads than 87+ and even the 85s, and it was the first year for the EFI. These were mid 15 second cars (low 15 with a good driver) but it isnt a GT if it is a trunk car. I think you might get beat but not by too much.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #9  
jocww's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
hey man ill sell u my 84z l69 5 spd t tops and then you can go whoop his ***
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 08:48 PM
  #10  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
I had a friend in highschool with an 86 GT, but was auto. He raced another friend of mine with a stock 92 rs that ran low to mid 16's and lost. I'm gonna say you will win.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 08:01 AM
  #11  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
thx. I looked up torque and hp of rustang...200 horse and about 280 or something like that torque. now the horse isnt much more but then torque is. Will this make much of a difference? And Im wondering also is there a way to tell what size engine it is. Cuz Im pretty sure I got an L69 but could be different.....I do get pretty bad mileage and it seems quite a bit of power when I step into it.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 09:40 AM
  #12  
Nitrous Al's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: '90 Mercury Grand Marquis GS
Engine: 5.0L Ford V8
Transmission: AOD
Axle/Gears: 8.8" Ford, 3.08:1
Just run him and tell us what happens.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Car: 92Z28, 99SS, 83Z28 & 86GTA
Engine: 421, LS1, 327Turbo & 383
Transmission: T-56, 4L60E, T5 & 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4:10, 3:42, 2:73 & 3:27
Originally posted by ddn69
thx. I looked up torque and hp of rustang...200 horse and about 280 or something like that torque. now the horse isnt much more but then torque is. Will this make much of a difference? And Im wondering also is there a way to tell what size engine it is. Cuz Im pretty sure I got an L69 but could be different.....I do get pretty bad mileage and it seems quite a bit of power when I step into it.
Chk your 8th diget on the serial # or just type your # in here https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/vin/ and then u will know.

But if your an Auto I would bet your an LG4 as they didnt put the L69 to an auto in that year.


83 Trans Am (M5,A4) LG4 V8 8.6:1 5.0 (305) 150@4000 240@2400 4bbl 3.23 3.73 3.23 ----

83 Trans Am (A4) LU5 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 175@4200 250@2800 CFI ---- ---- 2.93 3.23

83 Trans Am (M5) L69 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 190@4800 240@3200 4bbl HO 3.73 ---- ---- ----

Engine codes: (8th digit of VIN)
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
84'Camaroboy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!!!
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 305 L69
Transmission: 5 spd
im sory to say but if ur and lg4 ur gonna lose misserably....giver a run and see how it goes. thas all i can tell ya. good luck
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 02:01 PM
  #15  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
Honestly I am almost positive its an L69. I checked it before. thats how I know...But ill double check it after for u guys. It may even be bigger then a 305 judging by power but I have no way to tell.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 02:28 PM
  #16  
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Car: 92Z28, 99SS, 83Z28 & 86GTA
Engine: 421, LS1, 327Turbo & 383
Transmission: T-56, 4L60E, T5 & 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4:10, 3:42, 2:73 & 3:27
Dude there is no bigger for your car stock.

83 Trans Am (M5,A4) LG4 V8 8.6:1 5.0 (305) 150@4000 240@2400 4bbl 3.23 3.73 3.23 ----

83 Trans Am (A4) LU5 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 175@4200 250@2800 CFI ---- ---- 2.93 3.23

83 Trans Am (M5) L69 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 190@4800 240@3200 4bbl HO 3.73 ---- ---- ----

Are the Engine options for your year m8. And note listed with the L69 is no Auto trany. They came with Auto's in 84 not 83.

Give us the 8th diget in your serial # and I'll tell u what motor u had stock.

Basicaly is your 8th diget an H or not?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #17  
TTA 1387's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Diamondhead, MS
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Originally posted by 25thmustang
1986 wasnt a very good year for the Mustang. They had worse intakes and heads than 87+ and even the 85s, and it was the first year for the EFI. These were mid 15 second cars (low 15 with a good driver) but it isnt a GT if it is a trunk car. I think you might get beat but not by too much.
86 was a down year for the Mustang as well as the detuned port of the F-Body.

But 85 was the first year for EFI. Had a buddy back then had a black GT, only available with the automatic. That car was a dog. '85 HO carbed cars were much faster.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 03:24 PM
  #18  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
If your car is completely stock, then you don't have an L69. Maybe your tranny was changed or maybe your engine was changed, but otherwise you probably have an LG4 or an LU5. So if you have an LG4 or LU5, then it won't be very close. LU5 power numbers can often throw you off, because it was just as slow as the LG4. They weren't designed too well. He weighs less than you and has more power. I'd race him just for fun, but its up to you. Don't be stupid and bet anything, just have fun at the track. Get a good launch, and do your best. And by the way, since you are a member of this board, I would suggest finding out everything about your car. After all it is yours and all the info is on here.

~Matt
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #19  
Nitrous Al's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: '90 Mercury Grand Marquis GS
Engine: 5.0L Ford V8
Transmission: AOD
Axle/Gears: 8.8" Ford, 3.08:1
JUST RACE HIM!!!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 06:10 PM
  #20  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
sorry guys it is a code H. It really doesnt feel like Im only getting 150 horsepower though....I used to have a 86 Monte SS and this car seems more powerful then that. I dont know how I thought it was a L69 maybe some site tricked me or something.

As for what my cars got--Since your wondering. Its Non Tilt Non Power locks/etc--Non A/C--Its got the wheels with the chrome around the sides. Someone said they are GTA wheels???They have chroms stars in the middle. Also the Tranny was rebuit, and A new exhaust system. Im guessing from the cat-back. Anyway...thats all I can think of. Let me know if theres anything else you wanna know.

Call me crazy but I dont think its the stock engine, Ive owned a 85 Z28,,,a 86 Monte SS, a 87 Cutlass S. and this car. And when my car is running in good condition I can launch from idle and make the tires squeel pretty loud. It also is very mean sounding when I floor it or even casual driving. If theres any kind of picture I can take of the engine or anything to tell what size it is please let me know. Lemme see if this works I got a few pics of the car.
(edit) I also get 12 mpg avergage. Does that seem about right? I think it sucks. I hate it. Im thinking about getting a 260 78 cutlass or something or maybe just a rebuilt 350..maybe rebuilt motor get better mileage? How about a 2 barrel VS 4 barrel whats the difference????

http://www.angelfire.com/ri2/dropdea..._Document.html

Im rambling on I gotta stop....Thx guys for the help.

Nate

Last edited by ddn69; Oct 25, 2003 at 06:40 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 06:40 PM
  #21  
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Car: 92Z28, 99SS, 83Z28 & 86GTA
Engine: 421, LS1, 327Turbo & 383
Transmission: T-56, 4L60E, T5 & 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4:10, 3:42, 2:73 & 3:27
NoProblem now go race

Looking at your pics, u dont have the dual snorkle so that first sign its an LG4, your dipsticks on the pass side so its a newer block (my 69 block is on the drivers side ) U got cast heads and cast intake, well basicaly your engine look's totaly stock. Could have cam and port work done but then theres usaly abit more visable mods done too.

Go race him and see how u do, u never know he might not know how to drive that car or it could be running bad.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 06:47 PM
  #22  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
Ya I dont think the mustang really drives too well. The previous owner to him which is also a good friend sold it to him put alot of money into it. Like he had to replace the whole rear end, and TONS of more stuff just to get it to run properly. I dont think the current owner really drives too well either since hes driven a v6 automatic for like the past few years before this car. And he beat the living **** outta that car. When I feel like it Ill ask him to race. I just really wanted to know what you guys thought. Always like some good advice.

Nate
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 06:55 PM
  #23  
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Car: 92Z28, 99SS, 83Z28 & 86GTA
Engine: 421, LS1, 327Turbo & 383
Transmission: T-56, 4L60E, T5 & 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4:10, 3:42, 2:73 & 3:27
I think MODS :P then go race him If u want some tips on what mods feel free to PM me.

This isnt the right section for them modification posts but there is a carb section and Tech / General Engine section for Q's too.

Last edited by Hawk92z-TDZ; Oct 25, 2003 at 07:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 06:59 PM
  #24  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
Definitely an LG4. What engine did your 85 Z have? Was it fuel injection? Was it carbed too? If it was the TPI 305 in the 85, then there is definitely work done to your car because that 85 should be a lot faster. If both are carbed, then they should drive the same. Get some headers and y-pipe. You'll like those

~Matt
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 07:12 PM
  #25  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
My Z28 had a carburator too...I got rid of it cuz at the time I had it it needed a new tranny and exhaust and wasnt working fulltime to pay for it. As for the Monte..It was rusted all over the place and the starter and battery died so I sold the rims and junked it. As for the Cutlass, It got stolen that was prolly my fav out of all my cars. I like G-bodies alot. I was thinking about trying to sell my car for either 1500 without subs or 2000 with the subs, and getting a loan and buying either a Grand National or a 4-4-2..Anyway before I sell my car Ill race him and let you guys know how it went. Expect more rambling in this thread. Like many of you I like to talk about cars. But unlike you. I hate working on them.....

Nate
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #26  
305LG4Cutlass's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Kingston Ontario, Canada
Not saying he will win or anything, but i beat an 83 Mustang wtih a 79 302 (the guy didn't even know what the motor was out of)
I have an 87 Cutlass with stock LG4 with cheap true duals and 3.73 open rear end. I beat his r/t but then i spun really bad through first and second gear

me:16.6@87mph
him:16.3@84mph

i think if I'd gotten traction (i didn't even do a burnout) i would have run a low 16.
my first time at the track i ran a 16.4 with better traction but it was shifting early and i wasn't brave enough to manually shift with the column shifter yet. it was also a lot hotter out and i needed to advance my timing and run 94 octane.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 10:12 PM
  #27  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
hey

wow I had a cutlass with the stock 307 and i could never spin the tires at all. It was weird. I couldnt even brakestand the damn thing. but ya on my trans am I squeel the tires in 1st i dunno if i do in 2nd though...Doesnt it suck with that shifter on the column..Uhhh I hate those!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 12:52 AM
  #28  
Nitrous Al's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: '90 Mercury Grand Marquis GS
Engine: 5.0L Ford V8
Transmission: AOD
Axle/Gears: 8.8" Ford, 3.08:1
That sucks. I had a '83 Cutlass with a 231 V6 and I could spin the right rear tire. I can squeal the right rear tire in my Town Car! 229 lbs. ft of torque to the pavement!!!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 03:23 AM
  #29  
305LG4Cutlass's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Kingston Ontario, Canada
The 307 will spin the tires from a stop if its running right. I know a guy with a Caprice with a 307 with over 200k on it and it will light up, not fast but it will light up. I also had an 83 Grand Prix with a 231 and it would brake torque but wouldn't spin from a stop, it just bogged.

Ya the column shifter sucks, can't decide if my christmas present should be a racing shifter or some headers for the ol LG4. oh ya and my car always squeals into second gear.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 07:33 AM
  #30  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
you could always get a ratchet shifter for it!

I also found out that the mustang that I was gonna race is on the shelf. His friend said he needed some plastic or something for it? There seems to be always something wrong with it. I doubt itll even be running right when we race. LOL

Also if anyone can answer my heater core question and plug question both I think are in North east forum...I would appreciate some help.

Nate
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 07:55 PM
  #31  
305LG4Cutlass's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Kingston Ontario, Canada
Ya i want a ratchet shifter for it, but its either that or headers for christmas and i can't decide. I wonder which one would be easier to install? I have to remove the air conditioning to put the headers in. The ones that fit with ac are really expensive so i'm taking it out.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 08:01 PM
  #32  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Get the headers. They will actually make you faster.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 08:55 PM
  #33  
305LG4Cutlass's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Kingston Ontario, Canada
^Thats what i was leaning towards.
oh ya btw the 307 Cutlass usually run a mid 18 in teh 1/4. a 231 g body is like a 19 or 20 second car. :-)
i think my cutlass woulda ran a low 17 or high 16 with the 2.73's it had before, does that sound about right?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #34  
icebird_1981's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
in the tech section they give u tips on tuneing those lg4 carbs, that might help. aslo u could try some free mods like a CAI, if the exhaust was replaced with the stock size then thats also killing u the exhaust on the LG4 is just wrong. get headers, exhaust, high flow cat> that should make a good diffrence. thats if u wanna mod oh and ya that is the stock engine 99.9% sure lol.
good luck!
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 09:40 PM
  #35  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Revere, MA
Re: hey

Originally posted by ddn69
I gots L69 motor..190 horse? Im not sure of gears n such. Not much into cars...Im pretty sure his is a 86 gt or something..trunk not hatch if that helps????

If it's a trunk it's not a GT. GT's have always been hatchbacks.

86GT's are quick little cars. DOn't look at the peak HP number. It's only got 200HP but it's got more power under the curve if you know what i mean. The 79-86 cars are a bit lighter than the 87+ cars plus the short runner intake on the '86 makes a flatter torque curve.

EIther way, he wins.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #36  
CHEVY_EATER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh,NY
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Re: Re: hey

Originally posted by Mustang5L5
If it's a trunk it's not a GT. GT's have always been hatchbacks.

86GT's are quick little cars. DOn't look at the peak HP number. It's only got 200HP but it's got more power under the curve if you know what i mean. The 79-86 cars are a bit lighter than the 87+ cars plus the short runner intake on the '86 makes a flatter torque curve.

EIther way, he wins.
MY 100% stock 86 notch is ALL there. They fall off up top compared to the 87-93 cars but it is quick. My 86 weighs about 300lbs less than 93 GT. I have not driven my 86 much, only a few rips up and down the road sicne it was wrecked when I got it. But it moves, I know it is in the 14's somewhere. Some guys in Corral have gotten mid 14's with dead stock 86 notchbacks. Have to wait and see what I get with mine! I rna 15.54@92 with my 89 LX AOD 2.73, and my 86 is MUCH quicker than that. Heck, my 92 Crown Vic is a high 15 car!! 4000lb beast...hahaha
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #37  
ddn69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
thats pretty sweet. His car is also a 5 speed...Hell I havent raced him yet. But I dont really talk to him much either. And my car isnt running good right now. I gotta take it to the shop on monday to have the choke, timing, spark plugs checked.+whatever else...And if it helps any too his car has a replaced rag top, and tons and I mean tons of diamond steel all over the interior, and floor boards. So maybe he has some extra weight....After my car is running sound and stuff maybe ill race him.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sammy52401
Camaros for Sale
2
Nov 11, 2015 07:20 PM
2012sergen11
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
6
Oct 13, 2015 07:38 PM
Aaronv808
Members Firebirds
9
Sep 30, 2015 12:55 PM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 28, 2015 08:00 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.