couldnt believe this
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO SPRINGS
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
couldnt believe this
A few nights ago I was out cruising and I got stopper next to a newer Cavalier. It looked stock and I didnt see anything special so I didnt give it a second thought. He starts inching up and reving his engine so I figured I'd humor him with an *** beating. The light turns green and before we're even through the intersection I've got a couple lengths on him. But when I look over theres a mid 80's lowered Blazer with me step for step. This Blazer looked like a piece of crap but he must have had some pretty nice mods to keep up with me. Just goes to show you there are always sleepers out there.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: Warwick,RI
Car: 88 IROC-Z/00 GTP/05 VUE Redline
Engine: LB9 305/3800 SC/3.5 SOHC V-TEC
Transmission: A4/A4/A5
sure it was a blazer and not a GMC typhoon?
Those are turbo 4.3's. But it could have just been a blazer with a 350 and work done to it..that's a common motorswap for them.
Those are turbo 4.3's. But it could have just been a blazer with a 350 and work done to it..that's a common motorswap for them. Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
hey man....nice to know the blazer's are keeping up. Just to let you know, the 4.3L in my daily driver(S10 SS) would rip my camaro to shreds AND the camaro is a v8. Neither is stock, but I love killing camaros on the street with a lowered truck, like he said anything on the street is possible.
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Tremont, Illinois
Car: 1999 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
The 4.3 in our 2K S-10 Xtreme sucks. It revs so high before the truck moves. Our 91 S-10 4.3 seemed a lot better. That truck seemed like it could keep up with my IROC. The new truck feels slow.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Santa Fe, Nm
Car: 85' Trans Am
Engine: L-98 Vette engine
Yeah I know how that feels...I was begining to kill some integra....and then I noticed th older nissan altima started revin...light goes green...the integra was left beind...but i look to my right....and the was that damn altima...was keepin up well enoough to where if we were in the same lane...we would be touching.....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Winfield, IL
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350tpi comming soon!
Transmission: fixed the 700r4 again!
i got a 93 s10blazer with 145 k on it and once i got it tuned up, its pretty fast. with some basic mods like full exhaust and cold air kit im sure it could keep up with some thirdgens. thos vortec motors are stong . even with those modesm i think my camaro would be fasterbut not by alot.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
My brothers 1991 Blazer isnt too bad for a V6 in such a large vehicle, and my friends 1996 Blazer is very good too, but I prefer the 5.2 in my Jeep over either of them any day! But then again comparing those is stupid, I definately like the Blazers MUCH more than the Explorer 4.0s!
This reminds me of a time when I was cruising around with my buddy in his grand prix. We were at a stop light in a lane that ended shortly. When it turned green, he floored it to get infront of the guy next to us and get over. We looked over and this old conversion van is slowly passing us! Now the GP just had a 3.1, but still, we didnt expect this grizzly old man to be passing us like that!
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 28
From: Adrian, Mi, USA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
The Typhoon/Scyclones were the buick 3.8 Turbo motors. ( I wish it was a turbo 4.3......)
The 2.8L motors in the S-trucks was just WAY underpowered. Especially in a 4X4.......
The 2.8L motors in the S-trucks was just WAY underpowered. Especially in a 4X4.......
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
Originally posted by ploegi
The Typhoon/Scyclones were the buick 3.8 Turbo motors. ( I wish it was a turbo 4.3......)
The 2.8L motors in the S-trucks was just WAY underpowered. Especially in a 4X4.......
The Typhoon/Scyclones were the buick 3.8 Turbo motors. ( I wish it was a turbo 4.3......)
The 2.8L motors in the S-trucks was just WAY underpowered. Especially in a 4X4.......
uhmmm....no
the typhoons and syclones were turbo'd 4.3L engines and were never GN motors.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: wyandotte MI
Car: 87 formie
Engine: none
Transmission: none
Originally posted by ploegi
The Typhoon/Scyclones were the buick 3.8 Turbo motors. ( I wish it was a turbo 4.3......)
The 2.8L motors in the S-trucks was just WAY underpowered. Especially in a 4X4.......
The Typhoon/Scyclones were the buick 3.8 Turbo motors. ( I wish it was a turbo 4.3......)
The 2.8L motors in the S-trucks was just WAY underpowered. Especially in a 4X4.......
:nono: Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 1985 Iroc-z
Engine: 355 sbc
Transmission: 700r4
Re: couldnt believe this
Originally posted by 5.7L OF JUSTICE
so I figured I'd humor him with an *** beating.
so I figured I'd humor him with an *** beating.
yeah the good ole cavvies that have a fancy wing on the back and a stupid sounding exhaust and some lame graphics are star'ed numerous times for my "seak and destroy" kills... those lamers cant understand why cavy's are so slow and they think they can run a camaro, those silly fools
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 28
From: Adrian, Mi, USA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Ooops, My Bad. I stand (sit?) corrected. They were indeed 4.3 liters.
You would think, that after having done a top end overhaul with my boss at the dealership I used to work at, I would know this..... They ARE VERY fun vehicles to drive, especially with a little tweaking....... Wonder how it would go in my Firebird..... Mounts and such are all the same, engine is physically smaller. After all, it fits in the engine bay of an S-10...... Hhhhhmmmmm.
An AWD Firebird??? That would be interesting. And, as a side benefit, it would actually be driveable in winter.....
You would think, that after having done a top end overhaul with my boss at the dealership I used to work at, I would know this..... They ARE VERY fun vehicles to drive, especially with a little tweaking....... Wonder how it would go in my Firebird..... Mounts and such are all the same, engine is physically smaller. After all, it fits in the engine bay of an S-10...... Hhhhhmmmmm.
An AWD Firebird??? That would be interesting. And, as a side benefit, it would actually be driveable in winter.....





good run hope you had fun