Took down a stang....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington, United States
Car: 1986 Trans Am WS6
Engine: Mild 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Took down a stang....
I was out today getting applications and came up on a '89 or so GT 5.0 convertable 5spd. It sounded bada$$ and had the tips comming through the bumper. We cought a light and he starts revving, i emediatly thought he would be able to take me cuz his car is a lot lighter and sounded very healthy. The light turned green we took off and emediatly put 1/2 car on him and then started pulling away to about 8 cars when i shut it down at about 85-90MPH. He fallowed me and we cought another light together and he was like "damn, i gotta try this again". Nice guy, not they typical mustang driver. Anyhow, the light turned green again and i launched a little better this time and got 1 car on him and then the same result of about 7-8 cars at about 85MPH. I was pretty proud of the T/A today!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington, United States
Car: 1986 Trans Am WS6
Engine: Mild 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
25thmustang:
No times yet but im planning on hitting somewhere around a 13.8. I have great traction and its an auto so there's not much to worry about. The tires sometimes spin for maybe a foot but grip awesome.
*I have also had some people drive my car and they think it will hit low to mid 13's but im only guessing high 13's. I'll post some times when i get to the track though, hopefully this summer!
No times yet but im planning on hitting somewhere around a 13.8. I have great traction and its an auto so there's not much to worry about. The tires sometimes spin for maybe a foot but grip awesome.
*I have also had some people drive my car and they think it will hit low to mid 13's but im only guessing high 13's. I'll post some times when i get to the track though, hopefully this summer!
Last edited by Project_1986_TA; Apr 7, 2004 at 03:19 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Project_1986_TA
25thmustang:
No times yet but im planning on hitting somewhere around a 13.8. I have great traction and its an auto so there's not much to worry about. The tires sometimes spin for maybe a foot but grip awesome.
*I have also had some people drive my car and they think it will hit low to mid 13's but im only guessing high 13's. I'll post some times when i get to the track though, hopefully this summer!
25thmustang:
No times yet but im planning on hitting somewhere around a 13.8. I have great traction and its an auto so there's not much to worry about. The tires sometimes spin for maybe a foot but grip awesome.
*I have also had some people drive my car and they think it will hit low to mid 13's but im only guessing high 13's. I'll post some times when i get to the track though, hopefully this summer!
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington, United States
Car: 1986 Trans Am WS6
Engine: Mild 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
I am using a German tire called Fulda. They are Z rated and 245/50/16. Great dry traction but in the rain there not the best.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Stoneville, N.C.
Car: '88 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4/OD
I would like to see someone come up with a 305 tpi combo. that could take these "stangs" with the same cubic inch. You know, 5.0 vs 5.0. I know weight is a problem, but there ought to be something. I know that stangs and lightnings run pretty good (I hate to admit it), but I hate fords and I get so tired of "mustang this" and "mustang that". The "high-geared" set-up I have (.273), with bolt-on mods, is fairly quick on top-end. I can take alot of cars @ 100+, but most get scared of the sound of glass and tree limbs and back off. I'm a little stupid (probably too much "*****"), so these races are not very acurate.
3rd GEN. all the way!
3rd GEN. all the way!
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
you can guess my feelings on the stock gears they gave us, why not 3.23's or 3.42's at least GM, why why why? that would give us a better chance with the ponies.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
The 305 tpi isnt a bad motor and they can compeat with the 5.0, the problem is that there are more of the peanut cammed autos or Lo3's around than the good model 305 tpis. The 5-speed 305's with the good cam and decent gears can easily compeat stock for stock with a 5.0. The G92 option 305 runs easy mid 14's, the only reason everyone rags on the 305 is because most people have the crappy ones. Granted in the long run the 5.0 ford will go farther with the same amount of mods, but you would be able to keep up with them with close to the same mods.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Stoneville, N.C.
Car: '88 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4/OD
Originally posted by 2.73's Suck
you can guess my feelings on the stock gears they gave us, why not 3.23's or 3.42's at least GM, why why why? that would give us a better chance with the ponies.
you can guess my feelings on the stock gears they gave us, why not 3.23's or 3.42's at least GM, why why why? that would give us a better chance with the ponies.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
yea thats what I figured it was for the gas mileage, which is the only good thing about my car it does get awsome gas mileage.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Stoneville, N.C.
Car: '88 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4/OD
That's the only reason I haven't changed mine to a lower gear is the mileage. I commute 30+ miles one way to work. If I put 3.73 gears in there, I'll have to stop everyday for gas.
Re: Took down a stang....
Originally posted by Project_1986_TA
i emediatly thought he would be able to take me cuz his car is a lot lighter
i emediatly thought he would be able to take me cuz his car is a lot lighter
IROCaholic: I agree that stock for stock a 305 TPI car with a good driver could compete with the 302. The problem is, GM just flat out did NOT make the 305 a race type motor, if you get what I mean. It's noone's fault really, except GM's. Some guys on this site have made some 305's very fast. But for the money you spend on trying to make a 305 fast, you could have made about any other motor(besides a 307
) run a hell of a lot faster. That's just what I think though.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Stoneville, N.C.
Car: '88 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4/OD
I think what it is , people like myself have 305's and there's nothing really wrong with the motor (for what it is). I think the best thing (like alot of folks have said) is to add all the bolt-ons that can also go on a 350 or 400 until they either blow the 305 or decide what they actually want to put in there. Until then, I guess we'll keep on crying and asking dumb questions that have already been answered 100 times.
Originally posted by jmd88iroc-z
I would like to see someone come up with a 305 tpi combo. that could take these "stangs" with the same cubic inch. You know, 5.0 vs 5.0. I know weight is a problem, but there ought to be something. 3rd GEN. all the way!
I would like to see someone come up with a 305 tpi combo. that could take these "stangs" with the same cubic inch. You know, 5.0 vs 5.0. I know weight is a problem, but there ought to be something. 3rd GEN. all the way!
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
A 305 definately can it just takes a bit more. It is more of an accomplishment to do it in a 305 then a 350 or so. It is just more expensive and takes more work!
For they guy who wanted to see it, go ahead and build it. Would be fun and raise a lot of eyebrows!
For they guy who wanted to see it, go ahead and build it. Would be fun and raise a lot of eyebrows!
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Stoneville, N.C.
Car: '88 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4/OD
There was a big discussion about this subject yesterday (during a family gathering after Easter). My cousin(who has worked on cars all his life) tells me I need to rip out the 2.73 and put 3.73 gears in, and he'll fix me up with a 75hp dry-shot NOS system, which he says if I go any higher will burn my pistons, and throw a chip in.
He says with the 700r4 w/od, I won't notice alot of gas mileage difference. I just find that hard to believe.
He says with the 700r4 w/od, I won't notice alot of gas mileage difference. I just find that hard to believe.



