Who....
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Behind the boathouse
Car: Huffy 10 speed ;)
Engine: My legs
Transmission: My wrist
Axle/Gears: Little spokey things
Who....
I had a 1972 Chevy pickup with a 383/700/3.73 set up for the street. It had a Comp 274 Xtreme cam and a good set up motor. The thing weighed as much as any 30 year old truck. I was just wondering, does what does everybody think would happen against a 92 L98, the fastest (nonturbo) thirdgen off the top of my head. I know what would win (I ran it at the track), I just wanted to see what everybody thought.
:lala:
:lala:
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Re: Who....
Originally posted by cheyenne383
I had a 1972 Chevy pickup with a 383/700/3.73 set up for the street. It had a Comp 274 Xtreme cam and a good set up motor. The thing weighed as much as any 30 year old truck. I was just wondering, does what does everybody think would happen against a 92 L98, the fastest (nonturbo) thirdgen off the top of my head. I know what would win (I ran it at the track), I just wanted to see what everybody thought.
:lala:
I had a 1972 Chevy pickup with a 383/700/3.73 set up for the street. It had a Comp 274 Xtreme cam and a good set up motor. The thing weighed as much as any 30 year old truck. I was just wondering, does what does everybody think would happen against a 92 L98, the fastest (nonturbo) thirdgen off the top of my head. I know what would win (I ran it at the track), I just wanted to see what everybody thought.
:lala:
alot of it would depend upon drivers .....but why compare a truck with a 383 700r4 and 3.73 gears to a stock camaro ??
wouldnt it make more sense to compare it to a camaro with a 383 700r4 and 3.73 gears then you could get a true guess of how quick it actually is ?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Skatepunk60
I think the truck would kill the thirdgen. They may be heavy but the 383s arent slouches.
I think the truck would kill the thirdgen. They may be heavy but the 383s arent slouches.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
.....
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Behind the boathouse
Car: Huffy 10 speed ;)
Engine: My legs
Transmission: My wrist
Axle/Gears: Little spokey things
Re: Re: Who....
Originally posted by thegeneral
what did it run at the track ??
alot of it would depend upon drivers .....but why compare a truck with a 383 700r4 and 3.73 gears to a stock camaro ??
wouldnt it make more sense to compare it to a camaro with a 383 700r4 and 3.73 gears then you could get a true guess of how quick it actually is ?
what did it run at the track ??
alot of it would depend upon drivers .....but why compare a truck with a 383 700r4 and 3.73 gears to a stock camaro ??
wouldnt it make more sense to compare it to a camaro with a 383 700r4 and 3.73 gears then you could get a true guess of how quick it actually is ?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Re: Re: Re: Who....
Originally posted by cheyenne383
I didn't say what it ran because that would give away who would win. I'm not comparing it to an equally modified Camaro because it would have spanked it silly, 2000 or so fewer pounds. It isn't as quick as a biult thirdgen, but I was wondering what everybody thought about a truck that could pull a 5000+ lbs trailer and keep up.
I didn't say what it ran because that would give away who would win. I'm not comparing it to an equally modified Camaro because it would have spanked it silly, 2000 or so fewer pounds. It isn't as quick as a biult thirdgen, but I was wondering what everybody thought about a truck that could pull a 5000+ lbs trailer and keep up.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
does sound like the truck could win as long as he gets good traction that is ....
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
I ran a 383 truck once. it was 50-60's truck with nice 383 and a stick and he ran me pretty hard! I had three other kids in the car, adding 400+lbs so it sucked, but from a dig, it would have been close for a while but he probly would still have taken me
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by cheyenne383
Heres a pic. Yup, it's a long bed.
Heres a pic. Yup, it's a long bed.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Behind the boathouse
Car: Huffy 10 speed ;)
Engine: My legs
Transmission: My wrist
Axle/Gears: Little spokey things
Re: thats
Originally posted by 1981z28
a awsome looking c10. give me ur e-mail and i will send u some pics of my c10.
a awsome looking c10. give me ur e-mail and i will send u some pics of my c10.

As for traction, the rear suspension was heavy duty and the front suspension was plain wore out, so it actually hooked decent from a roll becasue of the weight transfer.
Heres a pic. Yup, it's a long bed
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
yeah but the nose isnt as good looking on those as they are on the 72
Hey I got one of dem der trucks!!! 69baby
oh and mines a show winner!
Hey cheyenne... maybe you should've asked something like this... "if my 383 truck was pulling 5000 pounds who would win me or a stock Camaro?"
Now that would get some replies...
oh and mines a show winner!Hey cheyenne... maybe you should've asked something like this... "if my 383 truck was pulling 5000 pounds who would win me or a stock Camaro?"
Now that would get some replies...
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Behind the boathouse
Car: Huffy 10 speed ;)
Engine: My legs
Transmission: My wrist
Axle/Gears: Little spokey things
Okay, the truck ran a best of 13.87, but it hit 104 mph, so traction was definately and issue. I still love my baby though, 13's on the motor and it pulls a loaded enclosed trailer.
I have taken several local Mustangs, Camaros, and a slew of imports. I have been beat, but hell, it's a truck.
I have taken several local Mustangs, Camaros, and a slew of imports. I have been beat, but hell, it's a truck. Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Nice! If i had a truck like that, it be up on 8inch lift with some 44" boggers and a built 427 Superram motor making TONS of torque. Running high 12's in the quarter launching in 4wd!!! That be BAD!!!! :rockon:
You wouldn't be running any 12's with wheels that big.
dont see why not. If there is enough power, then heck yea
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Oh well, it seems possible to me. A 800hp supercharged big block wont run into the 12's? I think so. Maybe 38.5" tires. LOL
But who cares anyway. No big deal. It would be cool as hell but i aint doing it any time soon. LOL
But who cares anyway. No big deal. It would be cool as hell but i aint doing it any time soon. LOL
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha, WI
Car: 90 Iroc-Z
Engine: carb'd 350
Transmission: built 700r4/3000 stall
Originally posted by stu
You wouldn't be running any 12's with wheels that big.
You wouldn't be running any 12's with wheels that big.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Jesus. What kind of gearing/power are they making.
I never said it was impossible, I happen to know of a certain semi that would probably benefit from larger tires since it's never even made a full throttle pass without smoking the tires all the way through the track.
I never said it was impossible, I happen to know of a certain semi that would probably benefit from larger tires since it's never even made a full throttle pass without smoking the tires all the way through the track.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i bet this one does. 860 with 125 shot but only 33 inchers. LOL
Says 0-70 in under 7 seconds in the SAND)
Big truck
Says 0-70 in under 7 seconds in the SAND)
Big truck
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








