Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Chevy typhoon....?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
82CrossfireInj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 82 Crossfire Injected Camaro, 1987 Mazda B2000 Pickup
Engine: 383 V8's
Transmission: Streetfighter TSI
Chevy typhoon....?

this guy in town that i met at the car wash (hehe) drives a black chevy typhoon, which i am assuming is the turboed awd version of the s10 blazer, all handles shaved, emblems shaved, well anyways, i was washing the Maro, getting ready to put it up for the winter,seeing as how she is coming down hard around my parts, and this guy offers a race, so i get his number and tell him ill think about it, he has some little mods in it, i know a NX tank in the back, more weight added with his sound system, and i know he has changed the turbo from its stock, but im not sure what it is, how do you think this would turn out, esp. with his being awd?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
i have to go with the typhoon because of the traction issue and your crossfire injection is holding you back badly ....
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #3  
88 350 tpi formula's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
the typoon (those things are bad ***)
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
82CrossfireInj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 82 Crossfire Injected Camaro, 1987 Mazda B2000 Pickup
Engine: 383 V8's
Transmission: Streetfighter TSI
i didnt doubt that it would be in his favor, mainly cuz of traction and my inj issues, but it got sick pullin out, all sideways nd ****, i guess i will run him, no shame in losing... i guess
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 06:12 PM
  #5  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by 82CrossfireInj
i didnt doubt that it would be in his favor, mainly cuz of traction and my inj issues, but it got sick pullin out, all sideways nd ****, i guess i will run him, no shame in losing... i guess

Just be safe about it and do it somewhere there is noone else to get hurt.....

and yeah theres no shame in losing ...especially if its to something faster ...its shamefull when you lose to something slower than you because you cant drive .....LOL

ive seen that more than once ...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #6  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I looked at your mods and it looks like you will take a beating of life time. Good luck.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #7  
z28kindaguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12
I thought the Typhoon was a GMC. Same difference anyhow.

You're gonna get raped. I remember seeing an article where they put the Typhoon up against a Ferrari and it beat it. I would just throw his number away.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Those trucks were the fastest production car from 0-60mph for a while. All he needs is a boost controller to smoke you, but you also mentioned him having a different turbo and nitrous? I'd be afraid to run him.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #9  
82CrossfireInj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 82 Crossfire Injected Camaro, 1987 Mazda B2000 Pickup
Engine: 383 V8's
Transmission: Streetfighter TSI
lol, yeah i dont think im gonna run him, just guna pack my tail and run
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #10  
z28kindaguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12
Also, I could've sworn that Typhoons were supercharged...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #11  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
If you run what you said you run, (high high 11s), you will most deffinately win but launch is important. Dont roast them and you should be able to get him. He probly low mid 12's but with the nitrous, could be pushing 11's. Depends on how much boost he is running with new turbo. Those cylcones are quick and typhoon is just a heavier version so bit slower. LOL BADASS trucks tho. :hail:
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #12  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
If you run what you said you run, (high high 11s), you will most deffinately win but launch is important.
Never say most definitely when you don't know anything about the other car. Or if nitrous and turbo are used in the same car.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 05:54 PM
  #13  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
stu, true but do you think a typhoon can run 11's with probly a small shot and turbo/boost upgrades? I thiink he would need a big setup, cuz one in a mag i seen ran 12's with huge turbo and weighed damn near 4000lbs. Based on what 82 said, he got NX and upgraded turbo from stock. True I dont know what he has but those typhoons are not the lightest things esp with sound equipt. This will be close.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #14  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Jesus Christ guys...ya's act like they are the fastest things on the planet. They're mid 13 second trucks

Granted he's spraying too but the guy could be complete moron.

If he IS running 11's it's only a matter of time until his block splits in half
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #15  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
He has turbo upgrade so faster than stock. LOL

well from the factory in those times, thats quicker than the damn flagship vette that GM loves. LOL The lightning today just barely runs that.

But he has turbo upgrade meaning more boost and nitrous meaning lots more power. Now that I think about it he possibly could be in the 11's.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #16  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
See, I told you.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #17  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Could be, could not be. The bottle just could be for show(yes, it's been done lol).

How do people KNOW it's not a stock turbo?

People hear Typhoon and automatically get scared.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 08:08 PM
  #18  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
i think youll loose 82. Typhoons are Quick!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #19  
z28kindaguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12
Originally posted by fly89gta


People hear Typhoon and automatically get scared.
For a good reason too.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #20  
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Yeah, I mean, I admit, I hear Syclone or Typhoon and I start getting scared, because I mean, really, they are fast as hell. The Syclone is lighter so it will be faster. I think chevrolet had an ingenious spark there...AWD turbo mini-truck.....what couldn't they hve made an AWD turbo Third gen, huh? Been so much cooler.....well, maybe not lol. They ran the Syclone back in 92 or 93 in Car & Driver (I think) and it ran 13.1's. I dont know if they can still do that today but I do know that buying a STOCK truck to run that fast, is just plain out sweetness. YOu can Work AND Play! But on racing that Typhoon man, Id race him. Dont back out man, you never know, he could be a poser meanin the NX bottle is fake and hes runnin stock....though Crossfire isnt what Id go with, Id just put like a 750 Demon on top of that motor
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 09:10 PM
  #21  
82CrossfireInj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 82 Crossfire Injected Camaro, 1987 Mazda B2000 Pickup
Engine: 383 V8's
Transmission: Streetfighter TSI
its what im thinking about, but i think i wanna go with Holley

Ima give him a call, and ive decided this is going to be my last race, simply because lady winter is coming, and i just dont wanna be killed, or kill anyone, but i wanna go with my dream, and start my pro street setup on the maro, i think that would be kick ***
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 02:23 PM
  #22  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
low 13s stock out of a Typhoon? where did you read this? was it modded? i thought they were only good to low 14s/high 13s out of the box due to their mass? all the GMHTP mags with them in it state that those trucks were low 14s stock

someone please enlightnen me

well from the factory in those times, thats quicker than the damn flagship vette that GM loves
why do non-Vette owners (especially guys that even own other GM cars!) hate on the Corvette so much? i have never understood this. does this mean that as a Corvette owner, i have to hate fbodies? is there some unwritten code? why all the malice guys?

Last edited by tpivette89; Oct 17, 2004 at 02:37 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #23  
megaracerx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
yea, i thought they were quick..but low 13's high 12's??
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #24  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by tpivette89


why do non-Vette owners (especially guys that even own other GM cars!) hate on the Corvette so much? i have never understood this. does this mean that as a Corvette owner, i have to hate fbodies? is there some unwritten code? why all the malice guys? [/B]
The largest club at our track that competes in Club Clash is called Corvette Connection, and a lot of the members are real dicks. But I still like Corvettes. I can't wait until I graduate school and can buy one, even though they are slower than what I drive now. I think people are just jealous.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #25  
Calico's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Eastside
Car: 1985 Buick Regal T
Engine: 87 3.8 turbo/lc2 drive train
Transmission: 200r4brf
typhoons are good for mid 13's and have a turbo 4.3 set up similar to the grans-nats. I rode in one and they are pretty quick...did anyone ever think that it might not be nitrous...but maybe...ALKY INJECTION?

tpivette89-hey what kinda times do you run in you 85 grand nat

stu-everyone hates the vette cause they are americas flagship sportscar and when your on top everyone also want to be on top...remember nobody hates on a bad thing...its when they stop on you hating you should worry....

I'd lose that #...but then I never fight a battle I can't win
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 07:20 PM
  #26  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
yeah i know alot of Corvette guys can unfortunately be a$$holes. id say alot of those types have just bought their first Corvette a short while before. theyre new to it and they think owning a Vette has elevated them above other drivers. the guys who have been in the hobby for awhile are usually better mannered. i personally owned three 3rdgens before i bought my first Corvette... in fact i still like them so much i bought 2 more afterwards!

Stu, you can beat C5s and Z06s? just how much does 5000 feet of altitude affect E/T and mph of NA cars?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #27  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
tpivette89-hey what kinda times do you run in you 85 grand nat
i dont have any times on it right now, as i currently have the motor apart. i only drove it stock for a few weeks, then the teardown began

i can say that with a mild tune, and a slightly slipping trans, i was able to beat my mid 15 sec LG4 Z28 by a few carlengths before i began the engine work. id guess its baseline to be somewhere in the low 15s. i expect a huge improvement when its all finished in a few weeks
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #28  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Calico
and have a turbo 4.3 set up similar to the grans-nats.
They do?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #29  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
well, not quite the same turbo setup as grand nat cuz lack of enginebay space, but with 4.3 liters for more power and lots of torque. Badass setup!

http://www.syty.org/old/brochure-trucks.html

280 hp and lots of torque. more than GNX grand nats!
Attached Thumbnails Chevy typhoon....?-tyhp.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 12:55 AM
  #30  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by tpivette89

Stu, you can beat C5s and Z06s? just how much does 5000 feet of altitude affect E/T and mph of NA cars?
I never said I can beat a ZO6. I've never had a chance to race one, but I've really been wanting too. I've NEVER seen a stock C5 (non-ZO6) run under a 14.00 up here. There probably has been some guy with drag radials or something do it, but I wasn't there (not that I pay all that much attention anyway). I tried to pay a little bit more attention at the last event, and there was a ZO6 pitted next to me that was dialing in at a 13.99, but that doens't mean anything, I think they can run 13.5s at least, but most of the guys up there aren't stock anymore.

At a mile above sea level, N/A cars will run around one whole second slower than the same car would at sea level. My track is at 5,800 ft aboe sea level. Turbo cars usually only lose around half a second at a mile above sea level. Supercharged cars lose closer to what an N/A car loses I believe.

Now, the Corvette guys really get into racing and know how to drive their cars (as far as I'm concerned), but the Viper guys are a whole different story. They either suck at driving, or purposely won't drive their cars hard. The only Vipers that I've seen run below 14.00s were modified. I even watched a guy with a new Viper run a 14.00 at like 104mph. He came off the line like he was leaving a stop sign in a school zone though, what a wuss.

So, I don't really know what a ZO6 or a Viper (of any year) is capable of running up here. I'm pretty sure I could edge out an older Viper from a roll, and I don't think a ZO6 would be able to shake me off either, but I still haven't had any run ins with either. Well, I tried to race a Viper once, but by the time I stopped spinning, he was already done.

I've got 277 whp and weighed in at barely 2,600 lbs with me in the car the night I ran my 13.89, so it's really my low weight that gives me a chance, but the altitude sure helps.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 09:16 AM
  #31  
Calico's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Eastside
Car: 1985 Buick Regal T
Engine: 87 3.8 turbo/lc2 drive train
Transmission: 200r4brf
GMC saw that buick made such a sucess with the intercooled turbo 6 set-up that they borrowed the technoligy for their next mini truck
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 11:12 AM
  #32  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I heard that they were going to develop a 400 hp TT Trail Blazer, but never really saw anything about it; did that ever get produced?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #33  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
TT trailblazer
http://www.trucktrend.com/roadtests/...in/index2.html

They should do something like that with the colorado. The ZQ8 sport package I think, but should have blown I5 motor. That be cool. Lingenfelter makes TT 427's for escalades, hummers, and probly other trucks too.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 09:53 PM
  #34  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
I never said I can beat a ZO6. I've never had a chance to race one, but I've really been wanting too. I've NEVER seen a stock C5 (non-ZO6) run under a 14.00 up here. There probably has been some guy with drag radials or something do it, but I wasn't there (not that I pay all that much attention anyway). I tried to pay a little bit more attention at the last event, and there was a ZO6 pitted next to me that was dialing in at a 13.99, but that doens't mean anything, I think they can run 13.5s at least, but most of the guys up there aren't stock anymore
i know, but you did say "Corvettes". the Z06 is a Corvette. have you ever raced at sea level? those base C5s would give you alot more trouble if you werent 5000 feet in the air

so a mile high altitude adds about a second to E/T huh? that would put the standard C5 right about where you said it would... mid - high 13s. boy id be pissed if i paid 40k for a new Vette and it only ran high 13s. thank *** i run at sea level

13.99 dial in on a Z06? i would think it should be a bit faster than that! i guess its hit or miss with those guys. they can either drive the hell out of their cars, or they absolutely suck a$$. anyway, that car is an 11 sec performer right out of the box (with the right driver and weather conditions). at Cecil County Dragway i personally witnessed a very near stock Z06 running 11.6s at 120mph. the only mods were a cold air kit and drag radials (if anyone doubts this, go over to www.corvetteforum.com and do a search for the forum member "Ranger"). hes since bested that time with an 11.5. so id say that puts the Z06 as a low 13/high 12 sec car where Stu runs
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:01 PM
  #35  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by tpivette89
i know, but you did say "Corvettes". the Z06 is a Corvette. have you ever raced at sea level? those base C5s would give you alot more trouble if you werent 5000 feet in the air

so a mile high altitude adds about a second to E/T huh? that would put the standard C5 right about where you said it would... mid - high 13s. boy id be pissed if i paid 40k for a new Vette and it only ran high 13s. thank *** i run at sea level

13.99 dial in on a Z06? i would think it should be a bit faster than that! i guess its hit or miss with those guys. they can either drive the hell out of their cars, or they absolutely suck a$$. anyway, that car is an 11 sec performer right out of the box (with the right driver and weather conditions). at Cecil County Dragway i personally witnessed a very near stock Z06 running 11.6s at 120mph. the only mods were a cold air kit and drag radials (if anyone doubts this, go over to www.corvetteforum.com and do a search for the forum member "Ranger"). hes since bested that time with an 11.5. so id say that puts the Z06 as a low 13/high 12 sec car where Stu runs
Altitude doesn't affect turbo cars as much as it does N/A cars. He might be able to run with C5's up in that ****ty air but get down here at sea level he's ****ed
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #36  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
13.89 without much traction at 106 at 5000ft is damn impressive. That trap indicates faster times i would think. Down around me, thats good for mid 12's considering the altitude. With traction, you could go lot faster. I would say c5 is no problem with your car but z06 will run with you or beat you. It will be real close.

gotta find the calculator that converts that time to sealevel and i bet it will be faster than C5.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:25 PM
  #37  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
13.89 without much traction at 106 at 5000ft is damn impressive. That trap indicates faster times i would think. Down around me, thats good for mid 12's considering the altitude. With traction, you could go lot faster. I would say c5 is no problem with your car but z06 will run with you or beat you. It will be real close
just convert his time. dont average in what it would be "with traction". Stus car wont get traction at sea level any better than it would at altitude. and from the way ive heard him talk about his suspention and how he likes to go from a roll, i doubt traction mods are on his to do list. also, keep in mind a turboed car (like Stus) will not lose as much power at altitude as a NA car would.

with a competent driver behind the wheel, a 6speed C5 is capable of at least a high 12 at 110+mph. Stu said at his altitude NA cars lose about a second. factor in a half second loss cause his car is FI and that puts him at 13.39. mph would probably increase by around 5 as well, putting that at 111. so in conclusion, id say from a stop a well driven C5 would do him in. from a punch it would be damn close. the outcome of that kind of race would come down to driver skill

Last edited by tpivette89; Oct 19, 2004 at 11:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #38  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
with a competent driver behind the wheel, a 6speed C5 is capable of at least a high 12 at 110+mph.
more than likely cuz i hear fbodys running around 13 flats and occasionaly a high 12.

Z06 is known to do 11.97 stock. GMhighperformance did a test and ran that time with 50 degree weather, and lower altitude. Think at englishtown


From what stu says, Z06s run in the 13's where he is at, and i am getting a bit confused to all this altitude and NA/turbo car stuff. LOL
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:58 AM
  #39  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think with drag radials I could pull maybe a 13.4-13.5. My 60's were 2.3 when I ran those times. At sea levelI'd put me at a low 13, or the highest 12 possible if I let Jesus drive my car.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #40  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by stu
I think with drag radials I could pull maybe a 13.4-13.5. My 60's were 2.3 when I ran those times. At sea levelI'd put me at a low 13, or the highest 12 possible if I let Jesus drive my car.
Are you frickin serious? You think a high 12 second car at best, as you said, would put you anywhere near viper or Z06 territory? You are smoking crack. Maybe a bone stock c5 would give you a good run, or when my z28 was stock it would be close, but if you seriously think you have anything for a Z06 or viper you are out of your mind.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:34 PM
  #41  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Are you frickin serious? You think a high 12 second car at best, as you said, would put you anywhere near viper or Z06 territory? You are smoking crack. Maybe a bone stock c5 would give you a good run, or when my z28 was stock it would be close, but if you seriously think you have anything for a Z06 or viper you are out of your mind.

here we go again
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #42  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #43  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
LOL. If everyone would kindly stop everything they are doing until all members can catch up to where the rest of us are. Is there a reading tutor somewhere in the crowd?
Hey, you two on the left! Stop horsing around and get back in line.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:02 PM
  #44  
JMD83's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 4
From: Boston, MA
Car: 1983 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305 H.O. VIN "H" LG4 (For now...)
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Stock Posi Disc
Originally posted by stu
Those trucks were the fastest production car from 0-60mph for a while. All he needs is a boost controller to smoke you, but you also mentioned him having a different turbo and nitrous? I'd be afraid to run him.
That Nitrous bottle may just be a bass tube... PepBoys sells a Bass Tube that looks just like an N.O.S. bottle. Very cheesy!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:05 PM
  #45  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by JMD83
That Nitrous bottle may just be a bass tube... PepBoys sells a Bass Tube that looks just like an N.O.S. bottle. Very cheesy!
Of course that is a possibliity. I just try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and not immediately assume that they are a clown.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #46  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by stu

Hey, you two on the left! Stop horsing around and get back in line.

but he started it !!!!
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #47  
Calico's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Eastside
Car: 1985 Buick Regal T
Engine: 87 3.8 turbo/lc2 drive train
Transmission: 200r4brf
Not alot of the turbo buick/tta/syty guys go with nitrious usually the suspect is alcohol injection?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 05:47 PM
  #48  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
those trucks are damn fast
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 09:36 PM
  #49  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Calico
Not alot of the turbo buick/tta/syty guys go with nitrious usually the suspect is alcohol injection?
yup yup
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #50  
Calico's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Eastside
Car: 1985 Buick Regal T
Engine: 87 3.8 turbo/lc2 drive train
Transmission: 200r4brf
hey tell me about your engine swap? do you run a/c or did you delete it? I was thinking of a similiar swap but ruled it out because of cost of all the parts
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
9
Oct 19, 2016 08:50 AM
z28venezuela
Auto Detailing and Appearance
10
Oct 24, 2015 08:15 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
1
Oct 13, 2015 03:06 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
Sep 10, 2015 02:02 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
Sep 2, 2015 01:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.