MX-6 vs 91 RS
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Stock 305 TBI
Transmission: Stock
MX-6 vs 91 RS
Any ideas? A buddy of mine just got a MX-6, 1993 with the V6, manual trans. He keeps mouthing off about how he could beat my car. Before I fire back, should I be worried? Its a 91RS, automatic trans (700-r4), excellent running condition, stock except for an open element, advanced timing and the ultimate TBI mods. So who's got a idea of who wuold win in a 1/4 mile. I just don't want to mouth off and then think "oh, yeah, your right", i'd rather stay quiet from the start if he has the faster vehicle.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i think it will be a close race. mx-6 is one of my favorite cars. 2.5 liter v6 is tiny but makes 164hp. with a stick its quick but nothing special. at 2700lbs runs high 15's or so. should be on par with TBI RS in good running condition
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX (home) Edmond, OK (school)
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
probes/mx6s arent known for their first gear, so you should definately take him off of the line. as stated earlier i would predict it would be close. if you really want to beat him maybe try some minor weight reduction. (i.e. spare, jack, back seats, wiper fluid) i noticed a difference after i took these out and the best part is that its free! good luck to you, also remember to powerbreak on ur launch (i'm sure you know just a polite reminder). update us on how things go.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Beach, Ca
Car: Gutted 92' RS TRACK ONLY / '86 Mustang gt 'vert / 1982 Yamiaha xs400 Cafe Racer
Engine: L03; TBI is IT! / 5.0HO (306) SFI / 400cc air cooled twin
Transmission: 700-r4 / WCT5/ 6-speed close ratio
"(i.e. spare, jack, back seats, wiper fluid)"
Wow that's seriously minor.
Wow that's seriously minor.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX (home) Edmond, OK (school)
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
in my opinion major weight reduction is gutting the car, carpet and sound deadening material or insulation, every seat but the driver things like that. and are you suggesting that making the car lighter doesnt help? im not saying i felt a huge difference like it was magical or anything. but i could tell, but apparently you guys were there and drove the car. im not an idiot i was just offering the guy some advice but sorry if what i felt was wrong. so let me prevent another debate happening and getting off topic, ok stu you win ur right im lying i didnt feel anything i just figured it would help my image here by saying that. so good job STU: 1 Me: 0 there good luck w/ the race man end of discussion about weight reduction.
Last edited by JDizzle; Dec 15, 2004 at 07:21 AM.
Originally posted by JDizzle
in my opinion major weight reduction is gutting the car, carpet and sound deadening material or insulation, every seat but the driver things like that. and are you suggesting that making the car lighter doesnt help? im not saying i felt a huge difference like it was magical or anything. but i could tell, but apparently you guys were there and drove the car. im not an idiot i was just offering the guy some advice but sorry if what i felt was wrong. so let me prevent another debate happening and getting off topic, ok stu you win ur right im lying i didnt feel anything i just figured it would help my image here by saying that. so good job STU: 1 Me: 0 there good luck w/ the race man end of discussion about weight reduction.
in my opinion major weight reduction is gutting the car, carpet and sound deadening material or insulation, every seat but the driver things like that. and are you suggesting that making the car lighter doesnt help? im not saying i felt a huge difference like it was magical or anything. but i could tell, but apparently you guys were there and drove the car. im not an idiot i was just offering the guy some advice but sorry if what i felt was wrong. so let me prevent another debate happening and getting off topic, ok stu you win ur right im lying i didnt feel anything i just figured it would help my image here by saying that. so good job STU: 1 Me: 0 there good luck w/ the race man end of discussion about weight reduction.
:hail: :werd:
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 250
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock??
my firends got a trubd mx-6 this thing is quick but he beats the shyt out of it. it would take most of our cars stock vs stock. but with some mods i could take him. and he said this is the fasted mozda they made that year.. blah blah.. but i think it should be close. Good Luck with that race
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
so how about a 93 mx6, stick, and headers versus my 87 SC w/a 350HO?
Brandon
Brandon
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally posted by pasky
mx6 goin down if its stock....really far down.
mx6 goin down if its stock....really far down.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Let me reitterate. The time it takes to even remove the rear seats is not worth the practically infentesimal difference in performance you might gain. I'd go as far to say the same thing for the spare as well, even though it's super easy to take out.
The rule of thumb is about .10 for every 100 pounds dropped. Your times can fluctuate a whole lot more than a tenth of a second just from how you drive, so I don't really see it worth the extra effort to remove less than half of 100 pounds for something you wouldn't be able to notice in the first place.
Although, I guess it's just one of my pet peeves when people strip their cars just to race, then put all their stuff back in. Why make your car fast for the track, then run around saying that your car will run certain times, if it's not set up the way you have it for the track while you're on the street. I was always confused by that. Just the same as people asking my why I don't drive my car down to sea level to get a better time. Why? I don't drive around at sea level anyway, so I don't care what my car runs at sea level. You know?
The rule of thumb is about .10 for every 100 pounds dropped. Your times can fluctuate a whole lot more than a tenth of a second just from how you drive, so I don't really see it worth the extra effort to remove less than half of 100 pounds for something you wouldn't be able to notice in the first place.
Although, I guess it's just one of my pet peeves when people strip their cars just to race, then put all their stuff back in. Why make your car fast for the track, then run around saying that your car will run certain times, if it's not set up the way you have it for the track while you're on the street. I was always confused by that. Just the same as people asking my why I don't drive my car down to sea level to get a better time. Why? I don't drive around at sea level anyway, so I don't care what my car runs at sea level. You know?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Beach, Ca
Car: Gutted 92' RS TRACK ONLY / '86 Mustang gt 'vert / 1982 Yamiaha xs400 Cafe Racer
Engine: L03; TBI is IT! / 5.0HO (306) SFI / 400cc air cooled twin
Transmission: 700-r4 / WCT5/ 6-speed close ratio
Ya. It really is all the little things combined that after time adds up to be a good amound of weight lost. You can't remove any single item and expect a difference.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Originally posted by /\/3\/\/l8l3
Even broken I'd rather sit in Stu's than drive a stock iroc or z28.
Even broken I'd rather sit in Stu's than drive a stock iroc or z28.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Originally posted by ScottyRS
Why would anyone want to do that?
Why would anyone want to do that?
Stock Iroc and z28's SUCK. If I drove a stocker then I would let people make fun of me, call me names, laugh at my muIIet (which I of course would be sporting with my awesome IROC) I am just pointing out that Stock Irocs and Z28's are the laughing stock of anyone, it symbolizes white trash.
Good day
Good day
I have am in no way loyal to any brand or type of car, I am a speed junkie and I do not like the different potrayals that each model has. Corvettes are characterized as a bunch of rich bitches and Camaros the joe dirt of the trailor, RIc3rs are well they are their own breed...mustangs have the same stigma as well, if its fast, has a strong aftermarket following i'm all over it. When I get rid of this Camaro thirdgen, i will probably buy a 4th gen, just for the fact that 4th > 3rd in aftermarket and following.....if I could find an AFFORDABLE 11second honda I would drive it, but that right now is not the case.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Beach, Ca
Car: Gutted 92' RS TRACK ONLY / '86 Mustang gt 'vert / 1982 Yamiaha xs400 Cafe Racer
Engine: L03; TBI is IT! / 5.0HO (306) SFI / 400cc air cooled twin
Transmission: 700-r4 / WCT5/ 6-speed close ratio
.
I do not feel that way PERSONALLY about 3rd gens but I do catch a lot of hell from people that think I am so country bumpkin, if you wanna report my post go ahead, but the fact still remains that is how this is how 82-92's are.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Originally posted by /\/3\/\/l8l3
Stock Iroc and z28's SUCK. If I drove a stocker then I would let people make fun of me, call me names, laugh at my muIIet (which I of course would be sporting with my awesome IROC) I am just pointing out that Stock Irocs and Z28's are the laughing stock of anyone, it symbolizes white trash.
Good day
Stock Iroc and z28's SUCK. If I drove a stocker then I would let people make fun of me, call me names, laugh at my muIIet (which I of course would be sporting with my awesome IROC) I am just pointing out that Stock Irocs and Z28's are the laughing stock of anyone, it symbolizes white trash.
Good day
Yeah, stock l98 cars running low to mid 14's are garbage.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Originally posted by /\/3\/\/l8l3
Stock Iroc and z28's SUCK. If I drove a stocker then I would let people make fun of me, call me names, laugh at my muIIet (which I of course would be sporting with my awesome IROC) I am just pointing out that Stock Irocs and Z28's are the laughing stock of anyone, it symbolizes white trash.
Good day
Stock Iroc and z28's SUCK. If I drove a stocker then I would let people make fun of me, call me names, laugh at my muIIet (which I of course would be sporting with my awesome IROC) I am just pointing out that Stock Irocs and Z28's are the laughing stock of anyone, it symbolizes white trash.
Good day
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Originally posted by /\/3\/\/l8l3
I have am in no way loyal to any brand or type of car, I am a speed junkie and I do not like the different potrayals that each model has. Corvettes are characterized as a bunch of rich bitches and Camaros the joe dirt of the trailor, RIc3rs are well they are their own breed...mustangs have the same stigma as well, if its fast, has a strong aftermarket following i'm all over it. When I get rid of this Camaro thirdgen, i will probably buy a 4th gen, just for the fact that 4th > 3rd in aftermarket and following.....if I could find an AFFORDABLE 11second honda I would drive it, but that right now is not the case.
I have am in no way loyal to any brand or type of car, I am a speed junkie and I do not like the different potrayals that each model has. Corvettes are characterized as a bunch of rich bitches and Camaros the joe dirt of the trailor, RIc3rs are well they are their own breed...mustangs have the same stigma as well, if its fast, has a strong aftermarket following i'm all over it. When I get rid of this Camaro thirdgen, i will probably buy a 4th gen, just for the fact that 4th > 3rd in aftermarket and following.....if I could find an AFFORDABLE 11second honda I would drive it, but that right now is not the case.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Originally posted by /\/3\/\/l8l3
Heavily modded '84, with 85 tpi, 3rd gen.
Heavily modded '84, with 85 tpi, 3rd gen.
Problem with you guys is you don't see cars as something that can be easily replaced, you get attached to your cars like people, maybe that explains why I have had 15 cars in the last 5 years
Thirdgen I have kept longer because I am having fun with this fuel injection.
Thirdgen I have kept longer because I am having fun with this fuel injection. Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX (home) Edmond, OK (school)
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
ok man i took out more than 50 pounds, and this makes you more right than me but read this and feel better but sure i had other stuff in the car just trash and random crap and i totally emptied my car, the jack and spare alone weigh like 30-40 lbs. the back seat is like 10-15 lbs. i took out the wiper spray which was full weighed like 5 lbs. i took out and with getting out all of my other crap i took 100 lbs or more. i mean everyone w/ a daily driver has a lot of stuff piled in and emptying that with teh combination of the weight reduction made a difference. and it took me less than an hour. 2600 lbs. isnt that light for a 4 cylinder import my friend w/ an EG hatch and a GSR swap weighs around 2200. a third gen has double the cylinders a solid rear end, driveshaft, and its bigger and it only weighs around 400 lbs more than urs? i think thats pretty good engineering if u ask me. but of course my opinions are wrong in your eyes and the fact that im 18 surely makes u even more right. btw yeah those first gen. mx6s/probes w/ the 4 cylinder turbo can be made into some pretty crazy machines but then i guess anything can with time and money. when r u gonna race him man? and are u gonna go from both a roll and a stop? my guess is that if he was going to take you itd be from a roll... STU:2 Me:0 congrats champ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by ljnowell
Somtimes i dont know stu, I just have to laugh with you.
Somtimes i dont know stu, I just have to laugh with you.
And for the record, I bet that right now, as is, my car could still walk a stock third gen, IROC or otherwise. Probably only once though.
I am heavily interested in thirdgens, but only for the EFI/prom aspect, if it was a carbed vehicle I would have sold it months ago...I mostly post questions regarding efi nowadays, but come on guys every loyal following of any car I have owned everyone thinks there model is superior to all, thirdgens are really for budget performance
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX (home) Edmond, OK (school)
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by /\/3\/\/l8l3
Nope I sport a 3rd gen just like everyone else here (other than stu!) edit: Yah 14's are garbage, if you don't run a low 13 then get back to the garage and start wrenching.
Nope I sport a 3rd gen just like everyone else here (other than stu!) edit: Yah 14's are garbage, if you don't run a low 13 then get back to the garage and start wrenching.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by JDizzle
ok man i took out more than 50 pounds, and this makes you more right than me but read this and feel better but sure i had other stuff in the car just trash and random crap and i totally emptied my car, the jack and spare alone weigh like 30-40 lbs. the back seat is like 10-15 lbs. i took out the wiper spray which was full weighed like 5 lbs. i took out and with getting out all of my other crap i took 100 lbs or more. i mean everyone w/ a daily driver has a lot of stuff piled in and emptying that with teh combination of the weight reduction made a difference. and it took me less than an hour. 2600 lbs. isnt that light for a 4 cylinder import my friend w/ an EG hatch and a GSR swap weighs around 2200. a third gen has double the cylinders a solid rear end, driveshaft, and its bigger and it only weighs around 400 lbs more than urs? i think thats pretty good engineering if u ask me. but of course my opinions are wrong in your eyes and the fact that im 18 surely makes u even more right. btw yeah those first gen. mx6s/probes w/ the 4 cylinder turbo can be made into some pretty crazy machines but then i guess anything can with time and money. when r u gonna race him man? and are u gonna go from both a roll and a stop? my guess is that if he was going to take you itd be from a roll... STU:2 Me:0 congrats champ
ok man i took out more than 50 pounds, and this makes you more right than me but read this and feel better but sure i had other stuff in the car just trash and random crap and i totally emptied my car, the jack and spare alone weigh like 30-40 lbs. the back seat is like 10-15 lbs. i took out the wiper spray which was full weighed like 5 lbs. i took out and with getting out all of my other crap i took 100 lbs or more. i mean everyone w/ a daily driver has a lot of stuff piled in and emptying that with teh combination of the weight reduction made a difference. and it took me less than an hour. 2600 lbs. isnt that light for a 4 cylinder import my friend w/ an EG hatch and a GSR swap weighs around 2200. a third gen has double the cylinders a solid rear end, driveshaft, and its bigger and it only weighs around 400 lbs more than urs? i think thats pretty good engineering if u ask me. but of course my opinions are wrong in your eyes and the fact that im 18 surely makes u even more right. btw yeah those first gen. mx6s/probes w/ the 4 cylinder turbo can be made into some pretty crazy machines but then i guess anything can with time and money. when r u gonna race him man? and are u gonna go from both a roll and a stop? my guess is that if he was going to take you itd be from a roll... STU:2 Me:0 congrats champ
I never said anything about engineering. I was merely making the point that it's much easier to make power than it is to lose weight. I guess you were till twisted up about some other post of mine that you missinterpreted to catch that. Oh well, no skin off my back.







he we go again.... 
no more needs be said.