Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Jerk in a eclipse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #1  
RED5SPDFORM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Some where in illinois
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: T5
Jerk in a eclipse

So im in wisconsin on 26 and some punk *** in a pulls up to me in a early 90s eclipse, good shape i might add. Well Im minding my own business and I see him laughing at my car, and hes revving at me and his bov and fart pipe snarlling. Well I get pissed, bring the motor to 2k light turns green blam blasted his *** bad. Oh and now he wont pull up next to me, Im thinking whats wrong cant laugh now can you. I dont understand why people are like this but none the less its always best to put them in there place.

Last edited by RED5SPDFORM; Oct 2, 2005 at 09:21 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #2  
goodtimes11's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
Nice kill. whats your mods? was it a gst or a gsx?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #3  
RED5SPDFORM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Some where in illinois
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: T5
Couldnt tell, The only mods that I have done to my car is an slp exhaust. Dont really know if my millage has to do with any thing.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 09:23 PM
  #4  
RED5SPDFORM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Some where in illinois
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by goodtimes11
Nice kill. whats your mods? was it a gst or a gsx?
My bad I ment to quote your reply. I do know if you do work to those cars they will haul ***.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #5  
Frozer!!!'s Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Chicago(DP)
Car: '90 RS
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 non posi
I had an Eclipse rev its engine at me but it was only a gs and it was riced out to the max so i didnt run him. Saw him later down the road run a riced golf and it was pretty damned funny lol
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 11:53 PM
  #6  
goodtimes11's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
That guy must have been a crappy driver.

stock gsx = stock 350 tpi
stock gst = stock 305 tpi 5 speed
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 02:52 AM
  #7  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by goodtimes11
That guy must have been a crappy driver.

stock gsx = stock 350 tpi
stock gst = stock 305 tpi 5 speed
And how did you come up with that? Seeing as the only difference is that one is AWD and the other is FWD.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 02:55 AM
  #8  
lilbowilson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
stock gsx = stock 350 tpi

I don't think so! I use to race my cousin in his 96 GSX back in 96 when it was new with my 305 TPI. First race I won beat him by a fender. Second race he won cause I let him have the kick he could only pull a fender on me also. My car only had a catback thats it! GSX stock was only 210hp.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 03:35 AM
  #9  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Yeah, maybe at a mile above sea level or something. On a really cold day.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:13 AM
  #10  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
In which case the boosted car would have had the advantage and the camaro is faster...
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #11  
goodtimes11's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
First of all gst spin out there tires stock because they are fwd second
305tpi vs gst
1988 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am GTA 7.4 15.9
1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T 7.4 15.9

hey look they pull the same times

for gsx vs 350tpi
1987 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am GTA (auto) 7.1 15.5(a little on the high side)
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX 6.9 15.2
1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX 6.4 14.9
pretty much equal. this is all straight from http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

yes i know that it is off a little but that site is fairly acurate.
there is some physical evidence other then us just running our mouths

did you race from a roll when you raced your cousins gsx because the major requirement of good times in a gsx is a good launch
second. yes you have more hp then your cousin but he also weighs less. its called hp to weight ratio. you said yourself you beat him by a fender sounds like to me a drivers race


3rd gens are nice cars i almost bought one. i needed the awd for winter. can't afford 2 cars since im a poor college student

Last edited by goodtimes11; Oct 3, 2005 at 12:23 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #12  
PhAnToMs's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: you aint stealing my car..
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Auto w/ shift kit
350 tpi's run 14-14.5 stock they have 24Xhp and 34Xtq stock compared to the 200 of the gsx/gst which only run flat 15's stock
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #13  
88 350 tpi formula's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
you guys always do this. is it really that hard to belive? no why, because any one can throw missmatched parts at a car and make it slower. I know a guy locally who has built several dsms and all were going to be soooo fast not one yet. now there is another guy who has one and yes his really moves!!

it's the same for all cars. wrong parts togeather bad tune ect. can make the car slower than stock easy
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #14  
RED5SPDFORM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Some where in illinois
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: T5
to be exact it was a 90-91 ecpipse possibly a 1st gen eclipse.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #15  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
90-91 Eclipse is a first gen. There have only been four generations now, including the very newest that I haven't even seen on the streets yet.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #16  
goodtimes11's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
you know what i have heard about those cars running low 14s stock they exist in dsm aswell but the thing is how often does it happen.

but third gens beat everything on the street hell there faster then lt1
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #17  
RED5SPDFORM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Some where in illinois
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by goodtimes11
you know what i have heard about those cars running low 14s stock they exist in dsm aswell but the thing is how often does it happen.

but third gens beat everything on the street hell there faster then lt1
Umm ok man, I never said my car is a race car and I never said I can beat 4th gens, Vettes and all that. Maybe it was just luck then with my 305 boat anchor turd gen right.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #18  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
My 3rd gen beats LT1 4th gens If I get my new transmission and a tune in before the next track date, I should be beating mild LS1 4th gens

I think you meant it was definitley a 1st gen and possibly a 90-91...not the other way around because like Stu said, the first gens were 90-94. Nice cars, I was looking at them before I bought my bird. Can definitely be made fast, as long as its a 5spd. The stock autos really kill those cars quite a bit. I'm sure they can be rebuilt/replaced, but the 5spds are much better stock for stock. Easy to make em a bit faster with a cheap MBC too.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #19  
Buddy's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 117
From: Kars, Ontario, Canada
Car: '87 FIREGOOSE!!!!
.

Last edited by Buddy; Oct 3, 2005 at 05:01 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 05:44 PM
  #20  
87TPI350KID's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
I wouldn't doubt it, those Eclipses are so so. If you 305 is in good running order with a 5 speed, no wonder it took him. As cars get older with factory turbos, they start to loose power, thus not making factory spec horsepower. Yes Stu we all know your honda had a bunch of miles and a turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #21  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
But you also apparently don't know that I was making way lower horsepower than I should have been with the boost level that I was running. Just because the motor was old though, not the turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #22  
banditfirebird's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: north carolina
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
so great! i bet it felt sooo great to put him in his place like that!
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #23  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
I once raced an eclipse on the freeway that kept trying to push me into racing.
it wasn't much of a race.
we where driving around from 60-90 or so for our races
everytime I kept pulling on him and the sad part was I was in the wrong gear.... 4th
3rd would of pulled all the way up to just a tad over 90mph

and most the time I let him get the jump on me and just easily reeled him back in. but at least he was being good sport and didn't get pissed and kept on racing
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #24  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Since we're talking about Eclipses at the moment, now would be a perfect time to mention a new world record.

http://www.shepracing.com/

John Sheppard is awesome.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #25  
lilbowilson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
WOW
That eclipse looks totally stock with a few stickers!
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #26  
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
i was waiting for Stu or someone to mention John Sheppard.....If I hadnt seen my Mustang passing by that day, I would be the proud owner of a damn WICKED 91 AWD Talon that would have ran some low 13's or 12's and with the mods I had planne,d owulda been a solid 11 second monster....but Alas, I endedu p in a 5.0....funny how I was going to choose a cheap car to mod anyways ....just ended up with my old camaros sworn enemy
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #27  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by stu.John Sheppard is awesome.
Shepard's GSX is definitely awesome, but Rick Head's 89 Camaro is simply unbelievable;

1989 Camaro
427-sbc TT
7.66 @ 186-mph
Street Legal, w/out slicks
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 10:11 PM
  #28  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Is that time without slicks? That's pretty impressive.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #29  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by stu
Is that time without slicks? That's pretty impressive.
world's fastest drag radial car, IIRC.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #30  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
What kind of 60's does he pull? If you look at the time of the Eclipse and compare it the the time of that car, it doesn't look like the big block is spinning off the line and getting traps that are higher than what the ET should be. You know what I mean?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #31  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
what does IIRC mean?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #32  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
IIRC = If I Recall Correctly
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #33  
lilbowilson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
it doesn't look like the big block is spinning off the line

Look again Stu thats one of those new 427 small blocks. Big block power with small block weight! Just read a article comparing the two the small block beat the big block by 10hp throughout the power band and its a 100lbs lighter. Killer combo indeed!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 01:52 AM
  #34  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I have never known what displacement they actually draw the line between big and small blocks.

See it says 427 sbc. There is a 'b' in there. Big starts with 'b'....
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 02:01 AM
  #35  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
big block vs small block isn't about displacement but more the actuall size of the block itself.

a ls1 has been made into a 427 it's still a small block but then there is the 396 big block as well

don't forget about the 400 it was a small block also but yet still larger displacement then that 396

mopar has a 383 big block if I remember right.


and some motor companies don't really have a big block or small block like the old pontiac motors being that most all of their engines used just about the same block


you take a small block 400 and put it next to a big block 396 your going to know the difference
while the 400 puts out more cubes the 396 is going to be huge and make that 400 look tiny
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 02:03 AM
  #36  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Like the difference between the Ford 5.0 and the Ford 4.6? I've seen a picture of them next to each other and the 5.0 is way smaller. Makes me think about putting a supercharged one into a Miata....
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 07:15 AM
  #37  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by rx7speed.while the 400 puts out more cubes the 396 is going to be huge and make that 400 look tiny
Yep. But don't forget about the size of the 396's cylinder heads, they're huge. The 400 small block, on paper, should be making more torque than the 396 big block (more cubic inches means more torque, of course)... but because of the superior head flow found on the 396 big block, even with 4 cubic inches less, the big block dominates. Especially in the long run.

... but hey, I'm biased.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #38  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
isn't one of the big block really mislabled?
I think it was the the 396 or something that really was a 402?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #39  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by rx7speed
isn't one of the big block really mislabled?
I think it was the the 396 or something that really was a 402?

Yep. If I remember accurately, and I may not, the original 396 design was dropped for some reason, and a new big block motor was designed to take it's place. The new motor actually displaced 402 cid, but it retained the 396 name for marketing reasons.

And yes, the difference between a big block chevy (BBC) and a small block chevy (SBC) is about external engine size.

In the old days BBCs were almost always bigger displacement wise. Nowadays they have 454 SBC blocks for sale from summit racing. However the biggest blocks are still, and always will be, BBCs.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #40  
lilbowilson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
See it says 427 sbc. There is a 'b' in there. Big starts with 'b'....

LOL!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #41  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
The difference between a big block and small block is the bore spacing. All small blocks have the same dimension from centerline to centerline of the bores. Same goes for a big block. It just so happens that the external size of the engine varies as well. The external size of all small blocks is the same and same goes for the big block. However, the technical difference is in the bore spacing and has nothing to do with the dimensional aspects of the motor.

That is why they ask the cliché question to judge someones hot rodding knowledge

"What is the difference between a 400 small block and a 400 big block?"

The answer is bore spacing.

The reason why some small displacement motors are larger in size than larger displacement motors is due to engine configuration. The Ford 4.6 is an overhead cam motor and the 5.0 is a pushrod single cam motor. Overhead cam motors are much larger in size than pushrod motors. The LS7 pushrod small block is smaller in size than a 4.6 SOHC.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #42  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone

The LS7 pushrod small block is smaller in size than a 4.6 SOHC.
That i did not know...

How do they compare in weight?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #43  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by rocluvr0013


How do they compare in weight?
Not sure about that but most of todays aluminum motors are in the 400 to 500 lb range.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #44  
80smetalfan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by goodtimes11
That guy must have been a crappy driver.

stock gsx = stock 350 tpi
stock gst = stock 305 tpi 5 speed
and I might add,

stock gs = iron duke f-body
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 11:02 PM
  #45  
goodtimes11's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
very true

but the gs's suck as a performance car especially the 1.8 sohc with a whopping 92hp. at least with a 3rd gen that comes with a iron duke you can swap out the engine. the gs are just screwed they cost to much to turn into a turbo model. and if you turbo the gs itself it will never have the same potential as the turbo models
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hot86z-28
Car Audio
16
Dec 21, 2001 11:23 AM
redcamaro83
Car Audio
2
Aug 6, 2001 03:39 AM
termite85iroc
Car Audio
2
Feb 28, 2001 06:55 PM
85ws6TA
Car Audio
25
Dec 16, 2000 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.