Who would win??
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
from what i've read about the tbichips.com guy, don't waste your money.
Stu, a 305 will always make more power than a lower displacement 4-banger. There is NO replacement for displacement. I happened to bump into a friend of mine today, and questioned him on his 305 powered vehicle specifically for this thread. His 79 Camaro is running 11.87@114 at it's best, and he can drive it daily if he wanted to. He said it has ****ty gas mileage though lol
It's not my car, so I can't claim his times as my own, but it's completely conceivable.
Stu, a 305 will always make more power than a lower displacement 4-banger. There is NO replacement for displacement. I happened to bump into a friend of mine today, and questioned him on his 305 powered vehicle specifically for this thread. His 79 Camaro is running 11.87@114 at it's best, and he can drive it daily if he wanted to. He said it has ****ty gas mileage though lol
It's not my car, so I can't claim his times as my own, but it's completely conceivable.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
full aftermarket TPI stuff will flow enough air to feed a 350 to 5500rpms. that will feed a 305 to 6000rpms.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i dont see why not? lol 5500rpms is plenty to make good power to run fast. my 383 idea should be shiftin at 6000rpms and make near 400rwhp.
You know what else there is no replacement for? Weight savings. It's just occured to me that they are about in the same area. Show me a street driven Thirdgen that weighs 2,000lbs with driver and I'll show you an N/A four banger that makes 400 whp.
Don't think I'm knocking this time fellas, cause I'm not.
Don't think I'm knocking this time fellas, cause I'm not.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
i dont see why not? lol 5500rpms is plenty to make good power to run fast. my 383 idea should be shiftin at 6000rpms and make near 400rwhp.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by brodyscamaro
Those aren't high performance RPMs!!! 

----------
Originally Posted by stu
You know what else there is no replacement for? Weight savings. It's just occured to me that they are about in the same area. Show me a street driven Thirdgen that weighs 2,000lbs with driver and I'll show you an N/A four banger that makes 400 whp.
Don't think I'm knocking this time fellas, cause I'm not.
Don't think I'm knocking this time fellas, cause I'm not.
Last edited by urbanhunter44; Apr 4, 2006 at 09:20 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
6,000 RPM is enough for a performance SBC...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
circle track cars are a completely different animal than street rods. If you're talking circle track racing, a more appropriate powerband is 5000-8000 rpm.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
circle track cars are a completely different animal than street rods. If you're talking circle track racing, a more appropriate powerband is 5000-8000 rpm.
I'm just messing with you because you made such a general statement, "performance SB"
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
i didn't realize you were talking circle track when we're on a forum where 99.7% are either street cars or drag race cars lol
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
i didn't realize you were talking circle track when we're on a forum where 99.7% are either street cars or drag race cars lol
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
hey now.. 13-15 second cars make good street cars... nice for daily driving and have some power.. at least the 13 second cars to 14 second cars.. 15's is slow...
now a nice street/strip car is a 11-12 second ride.. the better of that group is the 9-10 second drivers. mainly your nitrous'd or boosted cars.
whats funny is that i know their are plenty of 10 second n/a 4 cyl cars.. but i'm not sure of the wieght of those cars.. i would have guessed near 2000lbs total. but even then it would need alot of power to get into the 10's.. although i havent seen it done, i bet there is some 350-400whp 4's that are n/a. now a thirdgen will never wiegh 2000lbs.. but we can still get them into the 2700lb-2800 lb range and have a twin turbo aluminum small block or LSx motor and make 1200rwhp and run high 7's or 8's all day long. and probly beable to drive it on the street
but this isnt the place for that arguement
now a nice street/strip car is a 11-12 second ride.. the better of that group is the 9-10 second drivers. mainly your nitrous'd or boosted cars.
Show me a street driven Thirdgen that weighs 2,000lbs with driver and I'll show you an N/A four banger that makes 400 whp.
but this isnt the place for that arguement
Last edited by Orr89RocZ; Apr 5, 2006 at 01:44 AM.
You guys are getting off track. Third Gen, 305, Naturally Aspirated, all I've seen is no greater potential than an N/A Civic.
Now, about 15 second cars not being drag cars. This is obviously a statement from someone who has never drag raced competively before. There are many things required to be a drag car, and many things required to win races. A low ET is none of them. I've bested 10 second cars (it was a C4 Vette) with my 17 second Acura before.
Now, about 15 second cars not being drag cars. This is obviously a statement from someone who has never drag raced competively before. There are many things required to be a drag car, and many things required to win races. A low ET is none of them. I've bested 10 second cars (it was a C4 Vette) with my 17 second Acura before.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally Posted by stu
You guys are getting off track. Third Gen, 305, Naturally Aspirated, all I've seen is no greater potential than an N/A Civic.
Now, about 15 second cars not being drag cars. This is obviously a statement from someone who has never drag raced competively before. There are many things required to be a drag car, and many things required to win races. A low ET is none of them. I've bested 10 second cars (it was a C4 Vette) with my 17 second Acura before.
Now, about 15 second cars not being drag cars. This is obviously a statement from someone who has never drag raced competively before. There are many things required to be a drag car, and many things required to win races. A low ET is none of them. I've bested 10 second cars (it was a C4 Vette) with my 17 second Acura before.
Sure you can win races with your 20 sec ride, but you still got a slow car.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
I said street cars or drag cars. Most everyone's ride here is a street car - i.e. they drive it on the street. Alot of people drag race their cars as well.
If you build a 2.0L 4-banger, and a 5.0L 305 to their maximum potential and dynoed them, the 305 will win EVERY time, hands down. No replacement for displacement and the 305 will ALWAYS make more power.
When it comes down to racing and weight, it matters what platform you put the car in. You can strip an S10 with a built 305 down to 2000 pounds and weigh down the rear tires and it'll haul *** past your N/A 4-banger. Put the 4-banger motor in a thirdgen and run it against a built 305, and once again the 305 will spank it.
If you build a 2.0L 4-banger, and a 5.0L 305 to their maximum potential and dynoed them, the 305 will win EVERY time, hands down. No replacement for displacement and the 305 will ALWAYS make more power.
When it comes down to racing and weight, it matters what platform you put the car in. You can strip an S10 with a built 305 down to 2000 pounds and weigh down the rear tires and it'll haul *** past your N/A 4-banger. Put the 4-banger motor in a thirdgen and run it against a built 305, and once again the 305 will spank it.
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
If you build a 2.0L 4-banger, and a 5.0L 305 to their maximum potential and dynoed them, the 305 will win EVERY time, hands down. No replacement for displacement and the 305 will ALWAYS make more power.
Too bad there are ZERO competitions based on power output then huh?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,774
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally Posted by 1992camarors
I thought he was a pretty trustworthy person from what I have been reading on here.
He may be a nice guy and a good guy to work with but he cannot tun eyour car through the mail. Those that say he can have never done their own chip work. He will basically do what your hypercrap chip is doing. Adding fuel and spark where it is not needed and or just at the wrong spots.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: VA
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally Posted by stu
Too bad there are ZERO competitions based on power output then huh?
You basically said that a built 305 MOTOR = built 4 cylinder MOTOR. How else can you compare two engines besides on power output huh? You didn't say anything about the car or weight.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
stu, you must not headsup race very much, becuase that's what headsup racing is all about, power, and the ability to get it to the ground.
Originally Posted by DrivinVA305
So why the hell didn't you just say that CAMAROS with built N/A 305 are about on the same level as little light cars with built N/A 4 bangers instead of trying to put down the 305?
You basically said that a built 305 MOTOR = built 4 cylinder MOTOR. How else can you compare two engines besides on power output huh? You didn't say anything about the car or weight.
You basically said that a built 305 MOTOR = built 4 cylinder MOTOR. How else can you compare two engines besides on power output huh? You didn't say anything about the car or weight.
I said exactly that, about three different times. What the hell did you think I was talking about? Power doesn't mean **** if you weigh so much that your times stay the same.
mw66nova: Still missing the point. Built N/A 305 Camaro vs. a built N/A Civic are still in the same "class" (if you will) in a heads up race.
And no I don't do much heads up racing. I know for a fact that the only 'heads up' racing that 99% of the people on here do is street racing. All things considered, for the fifth time now, 305 is on par with 4 cylinder in a Third Gen. I'm not sure why everyone is arguing so hard.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
I still don't agree with that. There are many 12 second N/A 305s. I saw a couple last time I went to sears point in fact - BOTH thirdgens. I've never.. ever.. seen a 12 second N/A 4-banger at a local track. Ever. I've seen plenty of 12 second 4 cylinders, but all boosted. A 12 second 305 will also be alot cheaper, and probably more streetable than the 4 cylinder.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: San Leandro(Oakland)
Car: '92 Toyota Pickup
Engine: 22R-E
Transmission: 5sp Manual
Axle/Gears: 4:??
Yeah pretty much all N/A 4 cylinder cars are gutted and less streetable than "pig" thirdgens.
Unless that 4 cylinder is in-between a persons legs, I don't see where this debate is going.
Unless that 4 cylinder is in-between a persons legs, I don't see where this debate is going.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Too bad there are ZERO competitions based on power output then huh?
still don't agree with that. There are many 12 second N/A 305s. I saw a couple last time I went to sears point in fact - BOTH thirdgens. I've never.. ever.. seen a 12 second N/A 4-banger at a local track. Ever. I've seen plenty of 12 second 4 cylinders, but all boosted. A 12 second 305 will also be alot cheaper, and probably more streetable than the 4 cylinder.
but then again, yeah its not very street friendly as u lost all ur interior and most accessories to save weight, and have no low end power as the cams will make peak in the high 8000+rpm range LOL. sorta like those S2000's, no ***** down low but once u get them up in the rpm range, they move well
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
but then again, yeah its not very street friendly as u lost all ur interior and most accessories to save weight, and have no low end power as the cams will make peak in the high 8000+rpm range LOL. sorta like those S2000's, no ***** down low but once u get them up in the rpm range, they move well
A 10 second 4 cylinder car N/A is about as un street friendly as they come imo, but I'm sure there are 10 sec 305s that people drive. More displacement naturally gives you more hp/torque with better streetability.
And I agree, this arguement is going no where
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
Originally Posted by 1992camarors
Thanks Shifty. I am located in northwest Ohio also. I live in Van Wert Ohio, like 30 minutes from lima ohio. So is their any chance now?
Hey I am in Bryan OH, about 45 miles north. I have wanted to get into burning but havent really seen that it would be worth it on a MAF TPI car, but speed density TPI and TBI is a whole different story. If you want I'll race you with my 86 IROC, It is bone stock....
anyway pm me if you want to meet up. I am in VW fairly often to see a good buddy of mine down there.
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
stu, you crack me up sometimes... but he's right fellas. building a naturally aspirated 305 is similar to the 4 banger world. either purpose built 10's or street driven low 13's, 305's and 4 bangers are doin the same times.
There are few, even today, I-4 cyl N/A cars that will catch a 5.0 TPI car with the same drivetrain layout, i.e. auto vs. auto, 5 sp vs 5 sp. There are more than a few 5 sp. N/A 4 cyl cars that will run with auto LB9s, but I can't think of many that will run with a 230 hp/300 lb-ft 5 speed LB9 car.
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally Posted by superGMman
Yeah pretty much all N/A 4 cylinder cars are gutted and less streetable than "pig" thirdgens.
I think he was just refering to the stigma, but doesn't actually believe that himself. By the way, you'll NEVER see a fast auto import. N/A or otherwise. Economy cars come with economy automatic transmissions.
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally Posted by stu
By the way, you'll NEVER see a fast auto import. N/A or otherwise. Economy cars come with economy automatic transmissions.
My brother's Accord has got to have like 4.10s or something ridiculous for gears (it turns like 3300 rpms at 60), and it moves pretty decently for an auto 4 cyl. It would take care of the 6 cyl 3rd gens (except the TTA, lol), I'd say. Not exactly spectacular off the line though, lol.
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally Posted by stu
I know that MANY cars come with 4.10's from the factory (my Integra did) but I'd imagine that 4-speed autos would be geared way longer than that.
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
When it comes down to racing and weight, it matters what platform you put the car in. You can strip an S10 with a built 305 down to 2000 pounds and weigh down the rear tires and it'll haul *** past your N/A 4-banger.
Video - A 406 in a 240
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
HA! I bet that thing will never hookup. Sounds like my nova shoot I have trouble getting that thing to hookup.
I have a friend that has a 12 sec N/A neon 250 to 280hp at the wheels. He ran it for about a month or 2 until it broke a piston. He was running 12.1 compression on 93 pump gas. I told him I didn't think that was very streetable. So now he's running a new engine with a turbo. An he paid out his *** for both setups.
I have a friend that has a 12 sec N/A neon 250 to 280hp at the wheels. He ran it for about a month or 2 until it broke a piston. He was running 12.1 compression on 93 pump gas. I told him I didn't think that was very streetable. So now he's running a new engine with a turbo. An he paid out his *** for both setups.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
Angie Coots
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
4
Sep 23, 2015 07:42 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM








