Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
carfreak614's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Open 2.73
Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Are the fox body mustangs significantly lighter than the third gen camaro's? I looked online and didn't really get an answer. Ive been told that theres only a couple hundred pounds up to a thousand pound difference, which doesnt sound right, or that there isnt any difference in weight. Can anybody help clarify for me?

Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #2  
StevenB L98/LS1's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 710
Likes: 32
From: pensacola florida
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

The fox body mustang are lighter cars, which was an advantage for the 5.0, but only by very few hundred pounds, im not sure, but i believe 200-300 pounds lighter was the difference.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #3  
cIaRmOaCrZo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 913
Likes: 2
From: greenfield indiana
Car: 86' IROC-Z....and 5 other 3rdgens
Engine: 383 hsr
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.23, 10bolt
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

yeah its gotta be just a few hundred lb differance. a thirdgen camaro w/v8 wieghs approx 3,100-3,200 lbs. a fox body is approx 3,000 lbs. hell the size of the drivers can close that gap easily. depending on whos in which car.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:50 AM
  #4  
danziger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

It will depend on the two models/options compared. GT vs. GTA, LX vs. Formula, notch versus IROC, etc. However, a good guesstimate would be a 200-300 pound difference. The stripped out M5 LX notchbacks were the lightest Foxes and I'm pretty sure the M5 Formulas/IROCs were the lightest of the V8 F-bodys. I'm not sure on the LC2 TTA weight...
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 06:12 AM
  #5  
J91's Avatar
J91
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
From: Columbus Ohio
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Originally Posted by cIaRmOaCrZo
yeah its gotta be just a few hundred lb differance. a thirdgen camaro w/v8 wieghs approx 3,100-3,200 lbs. a fox body is approx 3,000 lbs. hell the size of the drivers can close that gap easily. depending on whos in which car.
Check your #'s! The last time I checked Third Gens were weighing in around 3,500-3,600 lbs. Foxbodies are definitely lighter cars..
With the small amounts of power these cars make stock, every pound counts!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #6  
killa66cam's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Camaro: http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...t-camaro-8.htm
Mustang: http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-mustang-8.htm

Cam
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 01:17 PM
  #7  
cIaRmOaCrZo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 913
Likes: 2
From: greenfield indiana
Car: 86' IROC-Z....and 5 other 3rdgens
Engine: 383 hsr
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.23, 10bolt
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Originally Posted by J91
Check your #'s! The last time I checked Third Gens were weighing in around 3,500-3,600 lbs. Foxbodies are definitely lighter cars..
With the small amounts of power these cars make stock, every pound counts!
idk, every resource iv ever used, and have always known was 3,200ish lbs. i may be wrong, but those are the numbers i beleive are correct. the only way for me to know for sure without using other resources is to wiegh it myself, lol dont know where id do that at.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #8  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

My old GTA(not the one I currently own) was 3700#'s with a full tank of gas.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 02:51 AM
  #9  
danziger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Good links! From personal experience with both cars, I would say the weights listed are a little lighter than in reality. However, it still gives a proportion to the two platforms...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 05:24 AM
  #10  
J91's Avatar
J91
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
From: Columbus Ohio
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Originally Posted by fly89gta
My old GTA(not the one I currently own) was 3700#'s with a full tank of gas.
Thank you!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #11  
TTA 1387's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Diamondhead, MS
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Here's what mine weighed in, without me:

89 TTA 3350
96 WS6 3460

Fox body cars were usually 3100-3300 depending on options.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 12:32 AM
  #12  
cIaRmOaCrZo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 913
Likes: 2
From: greenfield indiana
Car: 86' IROC-Z....and 5 other 3rdgens
Engine: 383 hsr
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.23, 10bolt
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Originally Posted by TTA 1387
Here's what mine weighed in, without me:

89 TTA 3350
96 WS6 3460

Fox body cars were usually 3100-3300 depending on options.
Thank you
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #13  
killa66cam's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Originally Posted by cIaRmOaCrZo
idk, every resource iv ever used, and have always known was 3,200ish lbs. i may be wrong, but those are the numbers i beleive are correct. the only way for me to know for sure without using other resources is to wiegh it myself, lol dont know where id do that at.
Originally Posted by danziger
Good links! From personal experience with both cars, I would say the weights listed are a little lighter than in reality. However, it still gives a proportion to the two platforms...
Weighting it yourself would be your best option. Every car will vary some...depending on what all is in them and what options the car has. I think that the Mustang Fox's are usually around 3000#...and the F-Body's are around 3500#, give or take a couple hundred pounds. So in drag times, you're talking .5 in a quarter mile. So stock for stock, the race is going to be about even...the Fox being lighter and the F-Body making more power, if it's the 350 anyways.

Cam
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #14  
Big Dog Chevy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Burbs, Illinois
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4, th400 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Frd 8.8 /3.27 and S60
Re: Fox Body Mustang vs Third Gen Camaro

Well I have two camaros (86'Z28 & 88' Camaro V8) and a 92' Mustang GT that I just got for free. The Z28 had pdl, pw, ac, 16" wheels, auto trans, power mirrors, and rear defrost it was 3610lbs. The 88 has less options and was 3420lbs. The Mustang GT had ac, pw, pdl, power mirrors and is a auto. It weighed 3290lbs with quarter tank of gas. One of my buddies has an bone stock 90' lx Mustang and he said it weigh 3105lbs on a truck scale. What made these cars quicker in stock form was that with the GT and the 5.0 LX they came with the HO motor, most were sticks, they were lighter, hooked better, had posi rears, and just made for racing the quarter better than the third gens. They made 300+ pounds of torque which came in at a low rpm which made them pull hard out the hole. There were too many options with the third gens. You could have a Iroc with a 305 or 350 tpi a Z28 with a 305tpi, 305LG4 or a TA with a 305LG4. With the Mustang you only got the 5.0HO motor with the GT and option HO 5.0 with the other models. You raced a V8 Stang you raced the HO package, not so with the third gen that's why they got a bad rap back then.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
angel2794
Theoretical and Street Racing
25
Mar 7, 2026 01:08 PM
1992 Trans Am
Exterior Parts for Sale
5
Apr 4, 2016 12:50 PM
bigben85
Camaros for Sale
3
Sep 13, 2015 10:12 AM
Zachattack0925
Tech / General Engine
2
Aug 12, 2015 09:54 PM
Zachattack0925
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Aug 12, 2015 09:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.