Stock Performance: MAF VS. SD
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Grinnell, Iowa
Stock Performance: MAF VS. SD
I've seen it stated before that the newer 3rd gens w/ speed density generally run faster ETs than the MAF L98s and not far off of LT1s.
Is there really much of a difference? I know that there are also other differences in years besides the SD, but are the 91 & 92s faster than the rest?
Is there really much of a difference? I know that there are also other differences in years besides the SD, but are the 91 & 92s faster than the rest?
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Thats because the later L98 cars had improvements, not because of SD.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Nope, although that is 1 of them but that was an option already on MAF cars in 89. It was due to the switch to lighter weight pistons, same year as the SD switch.
Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; Sep 10, 2002 at 01:32 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Genopsyde
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Oct 7, 2015 08:35 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
