TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

307 and tpi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 09:25 PM
  #1  
jase's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: west Point MS USA
307 and tpi?

I have a 307 for free and know where I can get a tpi system for 300 bucks. how would this work or not a good idea.I do have this engine for free so I won't be throw away too much money.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 02:46 PM
  #2  
87ColdAirIroc-Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: USA
it would not work if the 307 is a rocket (oldsmobile) The angle of a chevy v8 is 45* and an olds is 60*. The bottom line is the intake manifold will probably not fit.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
Ricktpi's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 2
From: Lower Salford, PA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
The two manifolds aren't even close. A 307 Olds manifold is wider than a SBC. You could always put a carb on it, though.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 09:10 PM
  #4  
bjankuski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Glenbeulah, WI
Car: 1988 Firbird
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Assuming the 307 is a Chevy engine it would bolt on and work just fine. If you are looking for max Hp, the 307 is not that good of a match for the TPI. A 307 has a 3.25 stroke and a 3.875 bore, which means it will want to rev to make power and the TPI intake does not like to rev much over 4800 RPM. If you plan to install a RV style cam in the 307 or use the stock cam the TPI will work well. You will need a TPI intake form a Corvette or 85 or 86 F-body to bolt up to the 307 heads; or you could elongate the center bolt holes on the 87 and latter TPI intakes to fit the 307 heads.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #5  
90iroc5spd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Alton IL
Car: 87 aniv vert, 90 Iroc, 87 LT
Engine: LB9, LB9, carbed 305
Transmission: MM5, MM5 conversion, MM5 conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73, 3.73
307's are junk do the automotive world a favor and get it and qucikly throw it away. dont disgrace a beautiful tpi system by putting it on such a junk *** motor
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
jase's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: west Point MS USA
Thanks. It is a chevy 307and I thought it would be neat to try this since the engine is free.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 07:00 PM
  #7  
vortech305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: United States
Well i had my 305 block bored to a 307 and im running a TPI system and ran a mediocre 14.4 at 94mph, with street tires
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #8  
jase's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: west Point MS USA
Thats not bad.Are you using stock heads and induction system?I thought a 307 wouldn't have the problem of vavle shrouding because of it displacement.Wouldn'a 307 have a better power potiential than a 305?What was the reason for the factory dropping the 307 anyway?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 12:08 PM
  #9  
vortech305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: United States
actually its a hydraulic roller 305 motor, and im running L98 vette alluminum heads, No problems with valves so far
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 06:13 PM
  #10  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally posted by 90iroc5spd
307's are junk do the automotive world a favor and get it and qucikly throw it away. dont disgrace a beautiful tpi system by putting it on such a junk *** motor
I hate ignorance..............


Truth be told, my machinist has REPEATEDLY bored a 307 to 4". Combine that bore with a its 3.25" stroke and you have a 327. In 1968 they also went to large journal motors, so a 3.48" crank into the block wouldn't be a problem. Granted, I know that isn't the ideal TPI motor. But will it bolt up???...with a pre-'87 manifold.......YES! Further....in 1968, the 307 came rated at 200HP with a 2 barrel carb. That's pretty close to the 305's best offerings with TPI. If you are gonna knock the 307, you better start knocking all these guys' 305's too.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 06:20 PM
  #11  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
Originally posted by rockind78
Further....in 1968, the 307 came rated at 200HP with a 2 barrel carb.

Ahhhh, but he didn't mention what year 307 it was. I have an 89 chevy with an Olds 307 in it, it was rated at a wopping 140hp and isn't good for much more because of the heads they used. And before you say "change the heads" these heads were the only ones that they had for the hyd roller cammed engines.
That car will be getting my IROC's old 305 when I rebuld it.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally posted by Morley
Ahhhh, but he didn't mention what year 307 it was.

Ya got me there, except, I am stating those numbers based on my '68 Chevelle. BUT that is with a 2 barrel carb, SMOG equipment (yeah...I didn't think they were making that stuff in '68, but I checked the #'s on the block and its original), and a single 2" exhaust

I have an 89 chevy with an Olds 307

Now you are comparing apples to oranges...we are talking different bore and different stroke.

in it, it was rated at a wopping 140hp and isn't good for much more because of the heads they used. And before you say "change the heads" these heads were the only ones that they had for the hyd roller cammed engines.

Go to a non-computer controlled 2 or 4 barrel from a decent era (pre-73), (you pick), tune it, and you will see some horsepower right there (maybe 10-20 horses????). Messing with the timing might pick you up a little more, and some decent exhaust should do the rest. By the way, Edelbrock sells intake and heads for your 307 (well not directly, you have to mill them, but I think you know where I am going on this)

That car will be getting my IROC's old 305 when I rebuld it.

By the way, I like (and own) 305's too .
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 07:28 PM
  #13  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
And for all that work and expense you could just buy a 350 with a ton more hp and tq.
I never said the 307 couldn't make hp, but it is cost prohibitive.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 07:59 PM
  #14  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
WOW!!! i guess the cost of distributors and intakes went up. Last time I checked, the cost of that stuff at a junkyard couldn't get you jack for a motor (unless it is perhaps a core) (that actually wasn't a knock Morely...I'm guessing you were actually referring to the E-brock stuff?? ).

As far as the Edelbrock stuff goes, I just through that in there for your knowledge (thought you might like to know).

To give my input on the original question, (which is what I should have done to start with), the main reason a swap of TPI to a 307 would NOT work, would be the heads. To my knowledge, 307 heads never came with hardened valve seats. To this end, you can't run leaded gas with an O2 sensor. You would either have to swap the valve seats (not worth the $$$ for the heads), buy new heads (well...maybe if you are boring out the block, which is feasible), OR, go with a 305/350 to start with. As far as bolt up compatibility, it WILL work.

For those of that insist on knocking Olds engines, I will leave you with this: Go find a guy who really knows Oldsmobiles, and happens to have a few extra diesel 350 blocks laying around (yes, they are worth something), and race him in his Cutlass. My money is on the Cutlass. Do the homework and you might even learn (if you care) why.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 08:23 PM
  #15  
Greasemonkey's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
If we're gonna get on Olds motors, theres really not much you can do to a 307. The heads suck, they're (somewhat) small cube, but you can't rev them due to the main webbing, etc. Reliable as hell tho, my moms car has 225,000 on the 307. About all we've done is change the oil.
Go find a guy who really knows Oldsmobiles, and happens to have a few extra diesel 350 blocks laying around (yes, they are worth something), and race him in his Cutlass.
Just cause it's a D or DX block doesn't mean its fast. However, if he's bored that thing over a bit (if you call .125 a bit) and stuck a crank in it, then he'd definatly be able to tear some stuff up. Olds did build some pretty good engines, 425's are pretty stout, and 403's would be awesome if they didn't have windowed webs.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 08:30 PM
  #16  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally posted by Greasemonkey
Just cause it's a D or DX block doesn't mean its fast. However, if he's bored that thing over a bit (if you call .125 a bit) and stuck a crank in it, then he'd definatly be able to tear some stuff up.
And we have a winner. I didn't think anyone would snag that in such a short time. GreaseMonkey, maybe I should have you over here when I rebuild the 455 in my convertible .
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #17  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
Originally posted by rockind78
To my knowledge, 307 heads never came with hardened valve seats. To this end, you can't run leaded gas with an O2 sensor.
What did I miss here? 307 heads not for use with unleaded gas? Surely you misphrased that?

For those of that insist on knocking Olds engines, I will leave you with this: Go find a guy who really knows Oldsmobiles,
Mondello?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 09:55 PM
  #18  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally posted by Morley
What did I miss here? 307 heads not for use with unleaded gas? Surely you misphrased that?
Yes... I did actually. I meant to say Chevy 307 heads. I'm not sure how long they made the 307, but I was under the impression it never got to see the gas crisis/ emissions laws of the mid-late '70's. I'm still trying to figure out where my 'velle came from 'cause it has all its smog stuff.
Mondello?
Oddly enough, I never have seen or heard of an article on a 440 build from him, but would be very interested in reading one.

Last edited by rockind78; Oct 19, 2002 at 09:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 10:47 PM
  #19  
Greasemonkey's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
How'd we get on Mopars? I'm assuming you're alluding to a 440DX. One of my favorite quotes about Mondello is that he's the Olds guru if you don't own an Olds, If you do he's not. I'll admit he knows a lot more than I do but he doesn't know as much as he thinks he does. Anybody interested in Olds go to www.oldspower.com and www.realoldspower.com They're good sites.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 07:28 PM
  #20  
jase's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: west Point MS USA
This is a chevy 307,and Iam not sure what year the block is.Someone said something about the heads?Forget those heads when any other smallblock chevy head will fit.The block is free and the motor is allready built and running on the engine stand.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 07:41 PM
  #21  
Greasemonkey's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
Heck, if the engines running AND free I'd go for it. Sounds like a pretty fun project.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Infested
Tech / General Engine
3
May 22, 2018 11:56 PM
Caspar
TPI
24
Jun 19, 2016 11:19 PM
stalkier
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Dec 6, 2015 11:25 PM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.