View Poll Results: what will be gained?
a broken sensor



3
14.29%
a tiny amout of power (not worth it)



3
14.29%
a lil bit on the butt dyno (do it if you are comfortable w/ it)



4
19.05%
messed up readings f*cking up the computer and actually hurting performance



11
52.38%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll
modding MAF poll
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Car: 1994 Jeep Wrangler
modding MAF poll
on a 305 w/ ported plenum gasketmatched/ port matched SLP runners and modded air box w/ K&Ns what would be gained by moding the MAF on a 85' Z? 89' computer tho.
Last edited by SMURFN' Z28; Jan 13, 2003 at 09:34 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: Damn
Engine: This
Transmission: New Stuff
e.) possibly all of the above.
I wouldn't. I took the screen out of mine way back when, no difference. Some people have problems when they mod the maf, I havn't had a problem with mine but it did nothing for me so I would rather have just left it.
I wouldn't. I took the screen out of mine way back when, no difference. Some people have problems when they mod the maf, I havn't had a problem with mine but it did nothing for me so I would rather have just left it.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Car: 1994 Jeep Wrangler
Originally posted by Bort62
The Best Mod you can Do for your Maf Turns it Into a MAP.
In the time it takes you to meticulously Remove the screens and Heat sink - You could have Converted to Speed Density.
The Best Mod you can Do for your Maf Turns it Into a MAP.
In the time it takes you to meticulously Remove the screens and Heat sink - You could have Converted to Speed Density.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Car: 92 T/A VERT
Engine: LB9
Transmission: AUTO
Axle/Gears: 7.5 / 3.42's
I've had two maf cars now one 305, and one 350. I descreened both sensors and noticed nothing on the 305 but I think I can actually feel a difference on the 350. Either way its probably not worth taking a chance on.
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: plainfield il
Car: 87 gta
Engine: 5.7 ltr
Transmission: full race 700r4
ask again in june and i will let you know. i have 2 now one is stock and the other i just got for track use. i plan on making several back to back runs with each to see if there are any real gains. after all proof is in the #s
Trending Topics
I've had my MAF de-sceened for about 3 years now and I can tell you it does not do a damn bit of difference. Leave it alone, it doesn't do anything except add to the chance of a broken sensor. Search around for Vader's posts on this. He has studied the MAF sensor quite a bit. He'll tell you why the screens are there and why they should be left alone. I don't think GM put them there to **** us off so we take them off.
I know quite a few people that have messed with the MAF and had just ended up short one MAF. I did not experience any problems....but I would NOT do it again with what I know now just in case I wasn't so lucky the next time. NO GAINS AT ALL.
I know quite a few people that have messed with the MAF and had just ended up short one MAF. I did not experience any problems....but I would NOT do it again with what I know now just in case I wasn't so lucky the next time. NO GAINS AT ALL.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




