Did their exist a 2.8L TPI???
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
Did their exist a 2.8L TPI???
I bid on this MAF on e-bay at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...406622493&rd=1
I didn't realize that it said "TPI 87 Camaro 2.8 MAF Mass Airflow Sensor "
Im not the smartest man in the world, but I am confident that there did not exist a V6 TPI, and a 2.8L V8 would be sacreligious..
Anyway.. what good is this MAF to me ? Im assuming it wont work with my 350 TPI ?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...406622493&rd=1
I didn't realize that it said "TPI 87 Camaro 2.8 MAF Mass Airflow Sensor "
Im not the smartest man in the world, but I am confident that there did not exist a V6 TPI, and a 2.8L V8 would be sacreligious..
Anyway.. what good is this MAF to me ? Im assuming it wont work with my 350 TPI ?
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: Northern New Jersey
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: For me to know.....
Transmission: and you to find out....
Oddly enough..my friend has a 87 with a 2.8 in it. To the best of my knowledge its MPFI. Ive never SEEN at 2.8 TPI set up and doubt very much it exists.
Later..
Dan
Later..
Dan
Re: Did their exist a 2.8L TPI???
Originally posted by omnipotentgoku
I bid on this MAF on e-bay at
Im not the smartest man in the world, but I am confident that there did not exist a V6 TPI, and a 2.8L V8 would be sacreligious..
I bid on this MAF on e-bay at
Im not the smartest man in the world, but I am confident that there did not exist a V6 TPI, and a 2.8L V8 would be sacreligious..
The 2.8/3.1 V6 engines in the F-bodies running from early 1980's (1984 or 5 maybe????) to 1992 that were fuel injected (I think they all were but don't quote me on that) all utilized a basic multi-point system. The induction differences between these engines and the TPI V8 engines was the use of long, "tuned", runners designed to develop low to mid-range torque in the 305's. I am not really sure why this followed suit in the 350's but I know that it did (except the rare '91-92 Firehawks...they used something a bit different). Maybe $$$ was an issue??? After 1992, GM went to the 3800 V6 which does utilize a form of Tuned Port Injection, but I imagine the design is a bit different. To advise you on your situation, I would stay away from an ad like that, as I would wajor that the MAF in question may not work. Good luck with everything.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 2
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
you people need to get your terms straight
MPFI=TPI
TPI=MPFI
TPI is a type of MPFI
just a slang name that was used to make it seem cooler
same things in the long run
MPFI=TPI
TPI=MPFI
TPI is a type of MPFI
just a slang name that was used to make it seem cooler
same things in the long run
Originally posted by 1991tealRSt-topGuy
you people need to get your terms straight
MPFI=TPI
TPI=MPFI
TPI is a type of MPFI
just a slang name that was used to make it seem cooler
same things in the long run
you people need to get your terms straight
MPFI=TPI
TPI=MPFI
TPI is a type of MPFI
just a slang name that was used to make it seem cooler
same things in the long run
LT1 was second. (On the Impala SS LT1, the cover says "Port Injection" as an FYI)
LS1 is third generation.
If fuel is injected behind the intake port, it's port injection. "Tuned Port", just signifys the use of tuned length runners as said above.
Sequential Fuel Injection, is port injection too in which each indv. injector fires at it's OWN specific time & not 'bank-to-bank' like others.
Ok, I'm done rambling...
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
well.. ok... what am I going to do with this MAF ?? Its for a 2.8 L, I have a 5.7 ... any hope of making them jive together ?
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by omnipotentgoku
well.. ok... what am I going to do with this MAF ?? Its for a 2.8 L, I have a 5.7 ... any hope of making them jive together ?
well.. ok... what am I going to do with this MAF ?? Its for a 2.8 L, I have a 5.7 ... any hope of making them jive together ?
Seriously though, they do not interchange. Heck, just look at the connections, they are totally different too.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
From: decatur IL
Car: 86 iroc, 87 iroc, 89 iroc, 89 formula, 84 supra, 85 trans am
Engine: t\a motor 355 lt1 intake, t56,the works, 89 roc 427 sbc tt project
Transmission: to many to list
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 4:10 in the T/A
there is a 3.8 tpi though
thanks
anthony
thanks
anthony
I'd hope that every port injection is somewhat "tuned."
It's just a name that GM thought would look good on badges, brochures, and throttle body plates. You could call an LS1 or LT1 "TPI" if you wanted, and I wouldn't argue.
It's just a name that GM thought would look good on badges, brochures, and throttle body plates. You could call an LS1 or LT1 "TPI" if you wanted, and I wouldn't argue. Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Car: 1989 Iroc
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: TH700R4
I read on another post somewhere on this site (it might have been the forum right below the TPI forum) that the difference between the 2.8 MAF and the TPI Maf was that the 2.8's put out a digital signal, where the TPI MAF put out an Analog signal. Thus, the the MAF on my '88 SC won't work on my '89 Iroc. I think it was Vader that posted in the differences between the two in that artical. You might want to do a search if your still interested.
Joker
Joker
Originally posted by rockind78
The 2.8/3.1 V6 engines in the F-bodies running from early 1980's (1984 or 5 maybe????) to 1992 that were fuel injected (I think they all were but don't quote me on that) all utilized a basic multi-point system. The induction differences between these engines and the TPI V8 engines was the use of long, "tuned", runners designed to develop low to mid-range torque in the 305's. I am not really sure why this followed suit in the 350's but I know that it did (except the rare '91-92 Firehawks...they used something a bit different). Maybe $$$ was an issue??? After 1992, GM went to the 3800 V6 which does utilize a form of Tuned Port Injection, but I imagine the design is a bit different. To advise you on your situation, I would stay away from an ad like that, as I would wajor that the MAF in question may not work. Good luck with everything.
The 2.8/3.1 V6 engines in the F-bodies running from early 1980's (1984 or 5 maybe????) to 1992 that were fuel injected (I think they all were but don't quote me on that) all utilized a basic multi-point system. The induction differences between these engines and the TPI V8 engines was the use of long, "tuned", runners designed to develop low to mid-range torque in the 305's. I am not really sure why this followed suit in the 350's but I know that it did (except the rare '91-92 Firehawks...they used something a bit different). Maybe $$$ was an issue??? After 1992, GM went to the 3800 V6 which does utilize a form of Tuned Port Injection, but I imagine the design is a bit different. To advise you on your situation, I would stay away from an ad like that, as I would wajor that the MAF in question may not work. Good luck with everything.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
MPFI = Multi Port fuel injection
TPI = Tuned port fuel injection.
Let me explain the differences between the 2.
MPFI if the V6 FI setup, the Injectors have a firing order like the timing firing order.
TPI is the V8 setup "duh" the reason why it's called Tuned port injection, is because of the tuned runners. TPI injectors run off of a batch fire setup, wich means that all of the left injectors will fire at the same time, then all of the right injectors will fire at the same time. You can unplug all of the injectors on the drivers side, then re plug the plugs in a random order and the car will run fine, because all of the injector plug wires become one big wire down the line.
aside from that TPI and MPFI are practically the same.
But anyways, yea it won't work.
TPI = Tuned port fuel injection.
Let me explain the differences between the 2.
MPFI if the V6 FI setup, the Injectors have a firing order like the timing firing order.
TPI is the V8 setup "duh" the reason why it's called Tuned port injection, is because of the tuned runners. TPI injectors run off of a batch fire setup, wich means that all of the left injectors will fire at the same time, then all of the right injectors will fire at the same time. You can unplug all of the injectors on the drivers side, then re plug the plugs in a random order and the car will run fine, because all of the injector plug wires become one big wire down the line.
aside from that TPI and MPFI are practically the same.
But anyways, yea it won't work.
Last edited by 5SIZ; Mar 17, 2003 at 10:20 PM.
Originally posted by 5SIZ
MPFI = Multi Port fuel injection
MPFI if the V6 FI setup, the Injectors have a firing order like the timing firing order.
MPFI = Multi Port fuel injection
MPFI if the V6 FI setup, the Injectors have a firing order like the timing firing order.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evilstuie
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
15
Apr 14, 2016 08:52 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM





