Cam Specs
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 1991 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Cam Specs
Just curious what everyone thought about a cam with the following specs:
296/304, .539/.558, 112
I have a guy that is very knowledgeable on engines and their components doing the research for me to get me the best setup he can find that will still be able to be driven on a daily basis.
296/304, .539/.558, 112
I have a guy that is very knowledgeable on engines and their components doing the research for me to get me the best setup he can find that will still be able to be driven on a daily basis.
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: Hartland MI
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Depends on what the rest of your set up looks like. If you are running a stock set up then :nono: but if you have upgrades such as better intake, heads, exh, etc. then
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 1991 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
exhaust has been changed, running straight pipe into dual race bullets. planning to install an lt1 intake, and the heads are somewhere down the road. the guy that is researching the cam for me is also trying to find the best heads for the combo.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
By all means it is a good cam for your future setup. As of right now, with a stock L98 top end and good exhaust, it is still too much. Leave it in the box until you have your heads and intake ready to go
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: ILL
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
I like to look at the .050 duration numbers.
An advertise duration of 296/304 sounds like a big cam.
I am running a solid roller that has an advertised duration of 280 and .050 of 242.
If you decide to run that cam, try to bump compression to at least 10.5-1.
By the way, you WILL need a higher stall torque converter.
My cam of choice would be the LPE 74219.
www.geocities.com/dzperf
An advertise duration of 296/304 sounds like a big cam.
I am running a solid roller that has an advertised duration of 280 and .050 of 242.
If you decide to run that cam, try to bump compression to at least 10.5-1.
By the way, you WILL need a higher stall torque converter.
My cam of choice would be the LPE 74219.
www.geocities.com/dzperf
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 1991 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by HiTech5
I like to look at the .050 duration numbers.
An advertise duration of 296/304 sounds like a big cam.
I am running a solid roller that has an advertised duration of 280 and .050 of 242.
If you decide to run that cam, try to bump compression to at least 10.5-1.
By the way, you WILL need a higher stall torque converter.
My cam of choice would be the LPE 74219.
www.geocities.com/dzperf
I like to look at the .050 duration numbers.
An advertise duration of 296/304 sounds like a big cam.
I am running a solid roller that has an advertised duration of 280 and .050 of 242.
If you decide to run that cam, try to bump compression to at least 10.5-1.
By the way, you WILL need a higher stall torque converter.
My cam of choice would be the LPE 74219.
www.geocities.com/dzperf
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Hmmm, you could also go with a thinner head gasket. That will yield a half point in compression (bump it up 0.5).
They seal just fine, just put it on right.
They seal just fine, just put it on right.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






