cam choice
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Car: 92 Camaro B4C 350
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
cam choice
First I have a 92 Camaro B4C with a 355 TPI, world class T5 , it has 081 heads on it now and I have a set of 416s laying around that I ported and polished, with 1.94 in/ 1.5 ex, milled .010, and am looking for a cam to install with my engine rebuild due too a bad piston slap from when I bought it a month ago from the previous owner. should i increase the combustion chamber size after cc' ing the heads to lower the compression a little, possibly get the 350 head gasket and check to see where i have extra room to enlarge the comb chamber?
main thing is Im worried about valve clearance, how much lift can i have without worrying about the valves getting blasted by a piston. Also with my high compression what type of duration should I look for, ive read 112 LSA is best for the TPI
I plan to port the intake, runners and plenum, it alreay has a K&N intake, airfoil, gutted air boxes, headers with dual cats through single muffler, and plan to install a 3.73 posi i have, also plan on getting full MSD setup... also have adj. fuel press reg
but for right now what type of duration and lift numbers should I be looking at for a cam, do you consider this mildly modified like i read for cam selection charts that say "for mildly modified engines" or should I be looking for more than mildly modified cams
thanks for any help
tim
main thing is Im worried about valve clearance, how much lift can i have without worrying about the valves getting blasted by a piston. Also with my high compression what type of duration should I look for, ive read 112 LSA is best for the TPI
I plan to port the intake, runners and plenum, it alreay has a K&N intake, airfoil, gutted air boxes, headers with dual cats through single muffler, and plan to install a 3.73 posi i have, also plan on getting full MSD setup... also have adj. fuel press reg
but for right now what type of duration and lift numbers should I be looking at for a cam, do you consider this mildly modified like i read for cam selection charts that say "for mildly modified engines" or should I be looking for more than mildly modified cams
thanks for any help
tim
Last edited by TexasB4C; Mar 23, 2005 at 03:54 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
You have to look for a cam that have "computer controlled" in the description. Lunaty has an EFI section .. that's good too.
http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...CC/Chevy5.html
(scroll down to the 4th section)
http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...CC/Chevy5.html
(scroll down to the 4th section)
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Car: 92 Camaro B4C 350
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
well i just bought this one off of ebay
int= .479 Exh.=.501 with 1.5 roller rockers
Dur.= 222 232 @ .050
LSA 114
what do you think?
cam specs
int= .479 Exh.=.501 with 1.5 roller rockers
Dur.= 222 232 @ .050
LSA 114
what do you think?
cam specs
Last edited by TexasB4C; Mar 23, 2005 at 07:26 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Look inside here. You can't go wrong here. You will find plenty of choises and the best cam for your needs.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Car: 92 Camaro B4C 350
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
ok i just got done cc'ing my heads (416's) and found them to average 65cc, they were milled .010 i ported and polished them, installed 1.94 intakes and unshrouded the comb chambers
does 65cc sound right? i had a mL dropper and had to convert it to cc and found out that mL are pretty close to cc's so that was a waste, am i right about 65mL equaling 65 cc?
what type of compression ratio will i have with a 355 and and 65 cc combustion chambers?
and from the previous question do i need to worry about max valve lift since i have a hydraulic roller setup?
thanks
tim
does 65cc sound right? i had a mL dropper and had to convert it to cc and found out that mL are pretty close to cc's so that was a waste, am i right about 65mL equaling 65 cc?
what type of compression ratio will i have with a 355 and and 65 cc combustion chambers?
and from the previous question do i need to worry about max valve lift since i have a hydraulic roller setup?
thanks
tim
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 1
From: Washington state
Car: 87 Irocz, 95 Z28, 71 Z28 /RS
Engine: 355 Tpi, LT1, 355
Transmission: Auto, Auto, 4sp
I went with a Lingfelter Cam
LPE SBC EFI Camshafts L98 & LT1 Hydraulic Roller SBC 305-383 211/219 .530/.560 w 1.6 rocker 112 CL $249.95
My engine is now a 355 waiting to be picked up tomorrow from the shop.
LPE SBC EFI Camshafts L98 & LT1 Hydraulic Roller SBC 305-383 211/219 .530/.560 w 1.6 rocker 112 CL $249.95
My engine is now a 355 waiting to be picked up tomorrow from the shop.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




