edelbrock high flow tpi system?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: webster city iowa
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
edelbrock high flow tpi system?
i was just wondering if anyone has used the edelbrock high flow tpi system and how good it works because i was thinking about buying one. any help woill be appreciated. thanks
p.s. i was also wonder if its worth it to buy tb spacers and if there is any improvement with them. thanks again
p.s. i was also wonder if its worth it to buy tb spacers and if there is any improvement with them. thanks again
Last edited by lil_grover; Oct 21, 2005 at 12:19 PM.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
stock edelbrock system needs porting to truely gain performance
i got a accel superam base that i'm porting and there is TONS of room to work with. definately needs ported
i got a accel superam base that i'm porting and there is TONS of room to work with. definately needs ported
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 13
From: St. Augustine, FL
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt-3.73
Buy it used, not worth it new. For the price of new, you could have your stock base and plenum extrude honed. The quality of the edelbrock base is suspect. I had to search through the back room through 5 intakes to find the one with the least amount of casting flash, and the straightest ports. Still had to port them afterwards.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
I have one . Base and runners. It's siamesed in 4" and base ij just cleaned up a bit . My plenum is ported and siamesed ( except behind the TB bores ) . I like it so far . But I had kinda though that if I opened up the runner the way I did I would see a more higher peak of the HP . But still it peaked at 4900 tehn lost about 20 hp by 5500 rpm. Which isnt the deadstop that the TPI is noted for but it still faded at around the same point ....just less so
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
D's89,
i think u could make abit more power at a higher rpm with a different cam.. zz4 is nice but leaves alot to be desired
i think u could make abit more power at a higher rpm with a different cam.. zz4 is nice but leaves alot to be desired
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
D's89,
i think u could make abit more power at a higher rpm with a different cam.. zz4 is nice but leaves alot to be desired
D's89,
i think u could make abit more power at a higher rpm with a different cam.. zz4 is nice but leaves alot to be desired
I hear ya there ( I just figured the intake in its currnet state would hit the 5500 mark--> they say ZZ4 tops out at 5500 ) . I had one picked out but now I got a turbo to think about ....so it all changes again
It would be nice to have everything flowed .As far as TB spacers . Junk leave'm alone . Not worth the time to put them on ....unless you were carbed.
Originally posted by D's89IROCZ
I have one . Base and runners. It's siamesed in 4" and base ij just cleaned up a bit . My plenum is ported and siamesed ( except behind the TB bores ) . I like it so far . But I had kinda though that if I opened up the runner the way I did I would see a more higher peak of the HP . But still it peaked at 4900 tehn lost about 20 hp by 5500 rpm. Which isnt the deadstop that the TPI is noted for but it still faded at around the same point ....just less so
I have one . Base and runners. It's siamesed in 4" and base ij just cleaned up a bit . My plenum is ported and siamesed ( except behind the TB bores ) . I like it so far . But I had kinda though that if I opened up the runner the way I did I would see a more higher peak of the HP . But still it peaked at 4900 tehn lost about 20 hp by 5500 rpm. Which isnt the deadstop that the TPI is noted for but it still faded at around the same point ....just less so
Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 6
From: USA
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt BW
I put the Edelbrock TPI base on my 350 L98. the intake runners need to be cleaned up, Edelbrock CNC machines the port entries, but leaves a sharp transition where the machining ends at the as-cast surface. it cleans up very nicely with the grinder though. the ports are definitely bigger than the stock TPI base, use the larger Mr Gasket TPI gaskets to match. I used SLP runners. I had to grind on the rear-side of the thermostat housing, seems it's a tight fit due to the bulk of the larger manifold runner size.
I had ordered the specific part number (3861) to mate with my old-style heads, but what came in the box was a universal fit. The tops of the intake runners were machined to clear late model cyl hds, and the center 2 manifold bolt holes were the dual-angle oval jobs. I used the supplied alum spacer washers under the GM torx manifold bolts to spread the bolt load, the instructions didn't say what these were for but they mysteriously fit the machined spot-faced washer surface perfectly. you have to use the original GM torx bolts for runner clearance.
because the tops of the intake port runners are machined, you have to be careful that the manifold covers the intake manifold gasket and the intake port on the cyl hd adequately, not a lot of meat or margin for error there. I used RTV sealer to improve my chances, successfully.
had to use teflon sealer on the manifold runner attaching bolts, seems the rearmost driver-side lower runner bolts connect to the rear manifold water cross-over passage, I was wondering why I had a coolant leak at the back of the motor, thought it was the manifold gaskets. I also used teflon sealer on the front passenger side just in case of symmetrical leaks.
the bolt hole at the front of the manifold for securing the fuel line bracket didn't line up for some reason, but the fuel lines are also secured under the alternator, so that's okay.
make sure to put pipe-plugs with teflon sealer in all the unused holes. I forgot a couple of them (various sizes), and had humongous vacuum leaks at start-up. they were pretty easy to find, since they all made loud unmistakable sucking noises.
I also rerouted the cable bundles to under the plenum, instead of between the valve cover and TPI runners. cleans up the engine appearance quite a bit.
Since I changed the cyl hds and the cam and the injectors etc all at the same time, can't say how much of the monster performance increase is due just to the manifold base. I think it's a pretty good combo with the SLP siamesed runners. I ported the front of the plenum to remove the ridge at the front (behind the TB), remove the taper on the TB mating face, and port-matched the plenum to the SLP runner entries.
I had ordered the specific part number (3861) to mate with my old-style heads, but what came in the box was a universal fit. The tops of the intake runners were machined to clear late model cyl hds, and the center 2 manifold bolt holes were the dual-angle oval jobs. I used the supplied alum spacer washers under the GM torx manifold bolts to spread the bolt load, the instructions didn't say what these were for but they mysteriously fit the machined spot-faced washer surface perfectly. you have to use the original GM torx bolts for runner clearance.
because the tops of the intake port runners are machined, you have to be careful that the manifold covers the intake manifold gasket and the intake port on the cyl hd adequately, not a lot of meat or margin for error there. I used RTV sealer to improve my chances, successfully.
had to use teflon sealer on the manifold runner attaching bolts, seems the rearmost driver-side lower runner bolts connect to the rear manifold water cross-over passage, I was wondering why I had a coolant leak at the back of the motor, thought it was the manifold gaskets. I also used teflon sealer on the front passenger side just in case of symmetrical leaks.
the bolt hole at the front of the manifold for securing the fuel line bracket didn't line up for some reason, but the fuel lines are also secured under the alternator, so that's okay.
make sure to put pipe-plugs with teflon sealer in all the unused holes. I forgot a couple of them (various sizes), and had humongous vacuum leaks at start-up. they were pretty easy to find, since they all made loud unmistakable sucking noises.
I also rerouted the cable bundles to under the plenum, instead of between the valve cover and TPI runners. cleans up the engine appearance quite a bit.
Since I changed the cyl hds and the cam and the injectors etc all at the same time, can't say how much of the monster performance increase is due just to the manifold base. I think it's a pretty good combo with the SLP siamesed runners. I ported the front of the plenum to remove the ridge at the front (behind the TB), remove the taper on the TB mating face, and port-matched the plenum to the SLP runner entries.
Last edited by RPOL98; Dec 24, 2005 at 12:52 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beachrodder
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 25, 2015 08:05 AM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM









