Meatiest Cam that keeps the stock SD computer happy?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Meatiest Cam that keeps the stock SD computer happy?
I am rebuilding my motor and am getting a cam. But I want something that will give me gains, but will keep the SD system happy. What should I look at. Also, the block will be 350 but the heads will be 305.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,407
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by BigWhiteGTP
I am rebuilding my motor and am getting a cam. But I want something that will give me gains, but will keep the SD system happy. What should I look at. Also, the block will be 350 but the heads will be 305.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
idk, a good tune should keep the SD system happy with most any cam... i'm not sure how big u could go without needing a tune. probly not too big. else u wont be seein the gains the cam is capable of.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
SD is not very tolerant of modifications on the stock chip, ask any TBI owner. Do yourself a favor and pick the right cam for your motor and gearing and have a chip burnt to match. Dont cop out on a nutless cam just because you dont want to burn a new chip.
this is one of those deals where us MAF guys have the last laugh. I have upgraded cam and heads and exhaust with the stock chip and I think my #s are pretty decent. the chassis dyno shows me fueling pretty accurately, although I could use more timing I am sure.
this is one of those deals where us MAF guys have the last laugh. I have upgraded cam and heads and exhaust with the stock chip and I think my #s are pretty decent. the chassis dyno shows me fueling pretty accurately, although I could use more timing I am sure.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by robert1
How do we find a good person to burn the chip though? I've been hunting around WI, and only found a place a few hundred miles away!
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 87 Iroc Z28
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: T56
Originally Posted by robert1
How do we find a good person to burn the chip though? I've been hunting around WI, and only found a place a few hundred miles away!
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Car: 1990 Corvette
Engine: 355cid
Transmission: ZF-6 speed
Axle/Gears: stock 3.33
with SD, you probably won't get away with very much change at all, maybe one step up in duration from your factory cam -- and this is only a guess. the post above regarding MAF is true, as fueling changes during partial throttle (ie, up to 80% TPS) are adjusted by the ECM on the fly; SD as you know has the fueling inputs hardwired into the lower fuel table in the chip. in this regard, the MAF guys have it all over us.
when i had my mods completed (with LPE 219 cam, which is 2 full steps up in duration), i had what i thought was a custom chip; the "tuner", who was big on this board about 2 years ago (whose name i won't mention), didn't make ANY fueling changes to the lower table in my chip (verifed by a .bin scan later), and consequently my engine detonated severely. my mistake for not verifying early on. no fuel = ultra lean detonation = top ring land failure. not a good thing.
you MUST have the chip recalibrated, even with mods such as exhaust (assuming long tube headers), on a SD setup. your ecm will not be able to compensate for the change in air/fuel ratio with SD, anywhere near what a MAF setup can.
when i had my mods completed (with LPE 219 cam, which is 2 full steps up in duration), i had what i thought was a custom chip; the "tuner", who was big on this board about 2 years ago (whose name i won't mention), didn't make ANY fueling changes to the lower table in my chip (verifed by a .bin scan later), and consequently my engine detonated severely. my mistake for not verifying early on. no fuel = ultra lean detonation = top ring land failure. not a good thing.
you MUST have the chip recalibrated, even with mods such as exhaust (assuming long tube headers), on a SD setup. your ecm will not be able to compensate for the change in air/fuel ratio with SD, anywhere near what a MAF setup can.
Last edited by LedHeadRed; May 29, 2006 at 09:43 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







