TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Will an 85 Carmao MAF Sensor work with an 89 Trans Am harness/computer????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2001 | 01:14 PM
  #1  
CamaroX84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Will an 85 Carmao MAF Sensor work with an 89 Trans Am harness/computer????

I have the maf sensor from an 85 5.0 L TPI
Camaro and the computer/wiring harness from an 89 5.7 L TPI Trans Am. Will they be compatible? Somebody else said they wouldn't.
Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2001 | 05:02 PM
  #2  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
I'll answer you again, but in a different way... call your local parts store and ask them for a MAF part number from an '85, '86 and '89. You will note that the '85 is a different part number. The '86 and '89 have the same part number. If you really want to triple check, you could call GM also and do the same. IIRC the '85 is a digital MAF and the '86-'89 is an analog MAF.

------------------
"Perfection is a trifle dull. It is not the least of life’s ironies that this, which we all aim at, is better not quite achieved."

-W. Somerset Maugham
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2001 | 08:33 PM
  #3  
CamaroX84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
But then why does TPIS sell replacement MAF sensors that they say will fit all 85-89 MAF TPI systems? Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2001 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Couldn't tell you why, however, you could always call and ask, or drop them an e-mail @ hpfarm@aol.com or hpfarm@tpis.com.

------------------
"Only in Britain could it be thought a defect to be “too clever by half.” The probability is that too many people are too stupid by three-quarters."

John Major
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2001 | 09:24 PM
  #5  
JoelOl75's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 88 Firebird WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
They are all the same. Except the difference from the v6 to the v8 (Delco vs. Bosche) on 3rd gens.




[This message has been edited by JoelOl75 (edited February 19, 2001).]
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2001 | 09:57 PM
  #6  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by JoelOl75:
They are all the same. Except the difference from the v6 to the v8 (Delco vs. Bosche) on 3rd gens.
[This message has been edited by JoelOl75 (edited February 19, 2001).]
</font>
Allright, here we go with the bogus info again. Here is the final post of a lengthy post on MAF operations that we had last March/April:


<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vader

Willie nailed it. '86 to (not through)'90 Bosch (O.E.M.) MAF's were the same for 305/350. The factory part number is the same (14094217).
The early 1985 Delco/Bosch MAF used an analog voltage output sigmal. This was used on early 1985 V-8 engines. These cannot be interchanged with the Bosch analog MAFs. The 1985 ECM also had a module attached to the ECM for MAF power and wire burn off functions. The hot wire sensor was a 41 gauge platinum wire that is very susceptible to vibration damage.

1986 and later V-8 models used a FM signal. This frequency modulated signal was actually derived from the output pulses used to maintain the temperature differential between the hot wire and incoming air. A high number of pulses meant that there was more air cooling the wire The ealiest of these had round wire screens in each end of the MAF openings, heat sinks for the electronics inside the MAF housing, and an open-collector transistor output to the ECM. The ECM now contained the logic for the MAF power and burn off functions, and the switching was handled by common relays. The hot wire sensor has the same 41 Gauge platinum wire. This MAF will flow 544 SCFM @0.01" SP with all parts intact.

1994 and later MAFs went back to analog voltage (0-5VDC). These later MAFs are also no longer Bosch (thank God!) and CAN be retofit to an older ECM with a "MAF Translator", available from several aftermarket sources. These MAFs use a solid state, thick metal film heating/sensing element that is much more durable than the hot wire. The sensor will flow 700+ SCFM in original configuration. It has one honeycomb matrix "screen" in the intake side of the housing.

Later,
Vader

BTW - Don't even get me STARTED on screen removal...


[This message has been edited by Vader (edited April 05, 2000).]
</font>
So there you go. On this board, I would say there are a half dozen of us that are pretty familiar with the MAF and it's operation, Vader is comfortably on the top of that list.

------------------
"Only in Britain could it be thought a defect to be “too clever by half.” The probability is that too many people are too stupid by three-quarters."

John Major

[This message has been edited by Red Devil (edited February 19, 2001).]
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 03:43 AM
  #7  
Kevin Irving's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
I have an 85 MAF in my car with an 87 ECM setup, just so you know that in at least some cases they ARE compatible. You can see the info on my webpage below:

------------------
Kevin Irving
85 Trans Am WS-6, 305 TPI, custom burned '86 PROM with '87 "165"ECM, Accel Supercoil & 8.8 Wires, MSD 6AL, Aluminum Driveshaft, TB Coolant Bypass, Ported Plenum, Modified MAF, Syclone Fuel Pump, JET Airfoil

15.556 @ 86.65mph, Nov 10, 2000.... I know it sucks.. but it will get better!

http://www.geocities.com/transam85tpi/
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 09:56 AM
  #8  
Greg '85 T/A's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 268
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1985 Trans Am/WS6
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Red Devil, your quote from Vader is WRONG. Vader corrected himself in a later post. All '85-'89 V-8 TPI MAFs had an analog output (not FM). They are all compatible. The only difference is their manufacturer (Bosch vs. Delco). BTW, the burn-off module is external to the MAF and irrelevant to this discussion. Check any '85 to '89 ECM wiring diagram or manual.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 08:49 PM
  #9  
JoelOl75's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 88 Firebird WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Yep! Thats completly incorrect! My '88 uses an analog signal that puts out on the green wire .5v to 5v

The only frequency generating MAFs used on 3rd gens were the delco (Not Bosche) used on the early 2.8L cars. They didn't have a platinum wire instead they used a mica film. I know this sh?t because I have a maf 2.8 and a maf 5.7 so much for being mis-informed. Yes the 4th gens use a frequency maf. You got that much right.

Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 09:18 PM
  #10  
CamaroX84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
So, contrary to what some may say, the MAF sensor from my 85 IROC 5.0 will work with an 89 GTA 5.7 harness/ecm?? Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 10:20 PM
  #11  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Are you guys sure? I called two parts places today and both have different part numbers for each. I tried GM but the lackey at the parts dept. couldn't even find me one number. I will look into this further now!!

------------------
"Only in Britain could it be thought a defect to be “too clever by half.” The probability is that too many people are too stupid by three-quarters."

John Major
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 11:16 PM
  #12  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,653
Likes: 309
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Greg '85 T/A:
Red Devil, your quote from Vader is WRONG. Vader corrected himself in a later post. All '85-'89 V-8 TPI MAFs had an analog output (not FM). They are all compatible. The only difference is their manufacturer (Bosch vs. Delco). BTW, the burn-off module is external to the MAF and irrelevant to this discussion. Check any '85 to '89 ECM wiring diagram or manual. </font>
Greg,

Yes, I corrected myself later. I had transposed the information for the Delco FM and Bosch analog MAFs. I had first incorrectly stated that the Bosch MAFs were digital and the Delco MAFs were analog output. I had that information backward.

That doesn't change the fact that they were different. The early 1985 TPI engines had a Delco FM MAF, 8-bit processor in the ECM, 160 baud serial link, limited I/O, and non-emissions compatible programming (with a completely different ECM part number - 1226870) and a MAF module piggybacked to the outside of the ECM. The very few late 1985 TPI engines produced came with the 1986-type 16-bit, 8192 baud ECM (P/N 1227165) and Bosch MAF, no piggyback module, and had an entirely different electrical connector on the MAF out of necessity to prvent mixing the two. This is the reason everyone has two different part numbers for the MAF sensors. The GM V-6 engines continued to use the FM MAF, and GM returned to the FM control scheme when the MAF returned to V-8 engines in 1992 Corvette LT1s. Incidentally, the Delco FM MAF also supplied the IAT sensor reading to the ECM in early 1985 and later V-6 cars, so there is another difference worth noting. Still think they're the same?

If you can figure out how to plug in an early 1985 Delco MAF to the later analog harness, go ahead. I'll tell you where to find all the repair parts when you post back here wondering what the hell happened. For anyone that is wondering ahead of time, the ECMs are listed above. The later ('85½-'89) analog MAF is P/N 14094712, the 1985 MAF is P/N 14081243. The V-6 uses the same sensing element and electronics package in a smaller diameter housing, updated GM P/N 25007557.

------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"No matter how hard you try you can't stop us now..."
Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2001 | 09:13 PM
  #13  
JoelOl75's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 88 Firebird WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
If you can plug the MAF in it will work. GM thinks we are all idiots so they designed the plugs different. If the MAF has 3 wires its a FM (mica) sensor if it has 5 then its an analog output (platinum wire). I personally never saw (nor heard of {not saying they don't exist}) a 3rd gen v8 with a fm sensor.


------------------
'88 Camaro RS 2.8L
'88 Formula 350 (Too many mods to list...)
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 08:00 PM
  #14  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
While I could not get an answer from GM I have spoken with an engineer at Wells,according to their info there were TWO different MAFS produced for the '85 year. He was a tad busy, so I'll call again sometime next week to inquire further, if anyone really cares at this point.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 09:00 PM
  #15  
JoelOl75's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 88 Firebird WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Just look at the plug on it.... That will easily and quickly resolve the prob IMO.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2001 | 04:13 PM
  #16  
Greg '85 T/A's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 268
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1985 Trans Am/WS6
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.27
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vader:
The early 1985 TPI engines had a Delco FM MAF, 8-bit processor in the ECM, 160 baud serial link, limited I/O, and non-emissions compatible programming (with a completely different ECM part number - 1226870) and a MAF module piggybacked to the outside of the ECM. The very few late 1985 TPI engines produced came with the 1986-type 16-bit, 8192 baud ECM (P/N 1227165) and Bosch MAF, no piggyback module, and had an entirely different electrical connector on the MAF out of necessity to prvent mixing the two.
</font>
Sorry Vader, you're close but still wrong -

My '85 has an 1226870 ECM with a BOSCH, 0-5 Volt out MAF. Swear to God.

Anyone interested in the truth, check this out:

http://www.ece.udel.edu/~davis/z28/ecm_swap/



[This message has been edited by Greg '85 T/A (edited February 26, 2001).]
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2001 | 08:40 PM
  #17  
Kevin Irving's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Same here, up until last July when the above mentioned Mike Davis switched out my old 870 ECM for the 165. Still using the same old Bosch MAF sensor that had been in there forever.

------------------
Kevin Irving
85 Trans Am WS-6, 305 TPI, custom burned '86 PROM with '87 "165"ECM, Accel Supercoil & 8.8 Wires, MSD 6AL, Aluminum Driveshaft, TB Coolant Bypass, Ported Plenum, Modified MAF, Syclone Fuel Pump, JET Airfoil

15.556 @ 86.65mph, Nov 10, 2000.... I know it sucks.. but it will get better!

http://www.geocities.com/transam85tpi/
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9192camaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Feb 3, 2019 12:21 AM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
mizz0313
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Aug 12, 2015 06:45 AM
timonator
LTX and LSX
3
Aug 11, 2015 09:56 PM
Leggman1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Aug 6, 2015 04:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.