cam
cam
how big of a cam will a speed density 350 take before the computer freaks out i have a comp cams xtream energy roller 218-224-.485.503 lsa 112 for my new motor will i nedd to get a chip burned for it. if so whos the best for chips
------------------
91 Z28 slp headers adj reg accell cap rotor coil comp cam roller
random tech cats flowmaster catback
------------------
91 Z28 slp headers adj reg accell cap rotor coil comp cam roller
random tech cats flowmaster catback
red350z,
anytime you change compression, cam profile,
or major airflow change, the stock chip will
not let you benefit from your new parts.
generally if you can keep the engine vacuum
above 16" your chip burner can do the deed.
if not youll have to devise a better system.
or change the cam. what you have is fine.
to make the cam work properly with that would be:
AIRFLOW!!!!!!
the stock tpi will work but not to the cams
full potential. open the ports and runners
if you can or buy them done.
9.5:1-11.0:1 compression
3.42-3.73:1 rear gear
airdeano
anytime you change compression, cam profile,
or major airflow change, the stock chip will
not let you benefit from your new parts.
generally if you can keep the engine vacuum
above 16" your chip burner can do the deed.
if not youll have to devise a better system.
or change the cam. what you have is fine.
to make the cam work properly with that would be:
AIRFLOW!!!!!!
the stock tpi will work but not to the cams
full potential. open the ports and runners
if you can or buy them done.
9.5:1-11.0:1 compression
3.42-3.73:1 rear gear
airdeano
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
I used a ZZ4 cam in my 350 engine with the stock 305 chip that came with it. However when I put in the LT4 HOT cam, the computer freaked out. Since your cam has the same 218 duration as my cam, I'd say you'll need a chip. The best custom chip is one you make yourself, like I do. Second to that is one a local friend makes for you, and third to that, I've heard good things about Ed Wright at http://www.fastchip.com/
------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.23 @ 107.62 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.23 @ 107.62 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
I have MAF, but my car does great with the LT4 HOT Cam and the PR chip. Between the 2, I spent less than $400.
------------------
1987 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
L98 TPI 350 (5.7L)
TH 700R-4 Transmission
Borg Warner 7.75" 9 Bolt Rear End with 2.77:1 Gears.
Current Mods: LT4 HOT Cam, Comp Cams 1.52:1 Roller Rocker Arms, LPE High Flow TPI Baseplate, Edelbrock TES 1 5/8" Headers, Catco 3" High-Flow Catalytic Converter, Hooker 3" Aerochamber Cat-Back System, Transgo Shift Kit, Performance Resource Chip, Accel Ignition, K&N Filters, JET TPI Air Foil, All Free Mods, Falken ZIEX Z-Rated Tires.
Best ET: 14.32 @ 97.7mph
(corrected for elevation)
------------------
1987 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
L98 TPI 350 (5.7L)
TH 700R-4 Transmission
Borg Warner 7.75" 9 Bolt Rear End with 2.77:1 Gears.
Current Mods: LT4 HOT Cam, Comp Cams 1.52:1 Roller Rocker Arms, LPE High Flow TPI Baseplate, Edelbrock TES 1 5/8" Headers, Catco 3" High-Flow Catalytic Converter, Hooker 3" Aerochamber Cat-Back System, Transgo Shift Kit, Performance Resource Chip, Accel Ignition, K&N Filters, JET TPI Air Foil, All Free Mods, Falken ZIEX Z-Rated Tires.
Best ET: 14.32 @ 97.7mph
(corrected for elevation)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








