TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any1 know how the getting the MAF to read more than 255 grams is going?? Vader??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 02:26 AM
  #1  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Any1 know how the getting the MAF to read more than 255 grams is going?? Vader??

Any1 know, I think Vader was doing something but I haven't heard anything??

------------------
89 RS

STILL Looking For:
87 IROC-Z28 350 TPI
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 05:11 AM
  #2  
88IROCs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
The MAF's are capable of reading more than 255 gm/s. In fact at 4.71 VDC, they read 254 gm/s. They can send an output signal of over 5 VDC. You do the math.

The problem lies with the ECM, which can only accept a max. value of 255. Short of teaching an old ECM how to page or teaching a newer one to do MAF, both of which would require reprogramming the microcode, this limitation remains.

The practical solution would seem to be to fool the ECM into 'seeing' less airflow than actual. Which would also require lying about the injector flow rate and some other related factors.

------------------
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world.
The unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man"
--George Bernard Shaw.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 01:22 PM
  #3  
No5.0's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: High Point NC
Car: Buick
Engine: 231
Transmission: 200r4
There is a tool called translator from modern musclecars or ramchargers the device uses a lt1 maf and somehow fools the computer to read more air.BTW this is for a 3.8 turbo I feel sure that a device exists to do what you are looking for.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 03:43 PM
  #4  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by No5.0:
I feel sure that a device exists to do what you are looking for.</font>
Not right now there isnt.

Reply
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 12:27 AM
  #5  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 88IROCs:
The MAF's are capable of reading more than 255 gm/s. In fact at 4.71 VDC, they read 254 gm/s. They can send an output signal of over 5 VDC. You do the math.

The problem lies with the ECM, which can only accept a max. value of 255. Short of teaching an old ECM how to page or teaching a newer one to do MAF, both of which would require reprogramming the microcode, this limitation remains.

The practical solution would seem to be to fool the ECM into 'seeing' less airflow than actual. Which would also require lying about the injector flow rate and some other related factors.
</font>
Dude, thats what I meant. I know the MAF can flow more than the ECM can read. I want to know how Vader's ECM fix is going.

------------------
89 RS

STILL Looking For:
87 IROC-Z28 350 TPI

[This message has been edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8 (edited July 17, 2001).]
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 06:27 AM
  #6  
Kyle F's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,OH
The one available for the TTA is allowing you to use a LS1 MAF because its larger. I still have to good old limitation, but its higher because the Turbo will suck a lot more air than a TPI will, or atleast that GM ever planned for one to.
WE don't fool the computer into thinking that its flowing more air, same amount, the translator just makes it so the TTA computer can read an LS1 signal. The larger less restrictive intak you have the less work the turbo has to do to spool up. This means more power sooner and a lot better times.

------------------
89 Trans Am Turbo 3.8L All stock 43,000 miles #1053 of 1555

Past Thirdgen:
86 Trans Am w/ built 355TPI with SLP goodies and too much other stuff to List. One sweet *** car, wish I would have had a good enough Job to pay insurance on three cars so I could keep it, but for a 89 Turbo Trans Am w/ Low miles, I think I made the right choice!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 02:57 AM
  #7  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Vader??

------------------
89 RS

STILL Looking For:
An 87 IROC-Z28 350 TPI
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 03:29 AM
  #8  
breathment's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 1
From: Bedford, Tx
how hard is it to convert to speed density?

------------------
88' GTA 350 MODS---&gt; air foil, K&N, Shift Kit, 180* therm, TB bypass
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 04:31 PM
  #9  
jRaskell's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
If the MAF is capable of a 10volt or higher signal, what about putting a voltage divider between the MAF and ECM, so the ECM only sees half the actual MAF voltage, then programming the ECM to supply more fuel appropriate to the fact that it's only seeing half the voltage? I'm thinking something similar to what's done with the Speed Density ECMs when using a 2bar MAP for boosted applications. You lose some resolution, but the end result is still better for heavily modified applications.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 11:37 PM
  #10  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
I run the MAF Translaotr on my 89 TTA with a 3 inch LT1 MAF .....this is for s stock setup, if i would get the MAF extender chip for my car it would read over 255 in the vicinity of 512-520 or so....
But as was stated earlier, u will lose resolution when u do this, they ahve to break it down to fit in the format that the formerly 255 max code was......twice as much in one space and the resolution does go down, but not using this myself i cannot say
Others using this system swear by it and i may get one to find out for myself by the way the MAf Translator will work on TPI cars os u can ditch the crappy original mafs
later
jeremy


------------------
LOOKING FOR FELLOW F-BODY ENTHUSIASTS TO START THIRDGEN CLUB IN NW IN AND FAR SOUTH CHICAGO SUBURBS , DROP ME A LINE IF INTERESTED OR POST ON THE MIDWEST BOARD

1989 Turbo Trans AM
100k and counting it breaks as fast as i wrench:-)
1991 Formula 350
daily beater with 45k
SLP catback
flowbooster
runners on order
MSD6
cold air kit
soon to be vortec headed,vortec intake, headers and cam etc
ASE Technician
Jaguar Certified Technician

Chat Mod @ thirdgen.org
Moderator NW IN/south chicago board


"If it aint broke make it faster"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GTAman
TPI
26
Sep 21, 2015 09:57 AM
andy74
Electronics
2
Sep 3, 2015 08:41 AM
mrdevontay
Body
0
Sep 2, 2015 08:04 PM
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 08:43 AM
jpearcy1
Wheels and Tires
5
Aug 9, 2015 10:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.