I'm stupid but i care!
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI going to LT1
Transmission: 5spd
now ive never seen one but i think it looks like an LT1 intake but flows better.
Andrew
[This message has been edited by smokin87iroc (edited November 10, 2001).]
Andrew
[This message has been edited by smokin87iroc (edited November 10, 2001).]
It is an aftermarket replacement for the TPI. You can see it at www.tpis.com. It does look like a LT1 and flows similarly, but has a place for the thermostat and distributor. I am guess you are not yet prepared for a discussion of short vs long runner length and peak torque yadda yadda yadda. When you are do a search on the Miniram (in the forum) and you will find more info than you can handle.
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI going to LT1
Transmission: 5spd
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">I am guess you are not yet prepared for a discussion of short vs long runner length and peak torque yadda yadda yadda. When you are do a search on the Miniram (in the forum) and you will find more info than you can handle. </font>
long runner length (stock TPI) allows (forces) the peak torque at a lower rpm and so a shorter length (LT1 Miniram) allows (forces) the peak torque at a higher rpm.
it has to do with when the valve closes it makes a compression wave that travels up to the plenum (place before the runners) and then the wave travels back down. the longer the tube the longer the wave has to travel, and since the wave travels at approximately the same speed no matter what intake you use, the long runners take more time for the wave to travel thus needing more time between valve openings (low rpm) to let the wave help "push" more air into the intake. short runner does not need much time so it needs a less time (more rpm) between valve openings.
if i miss typed or said something wrong please correct me anyone but i think i at least got the jist of it all
Andrew
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by smokin87iroc:
in short..
long runner length (stock TPI) allows (forces) the peak torque at a lower rpm and so a shorter length (LT1 Miniram) allows (forces) the peak torque at a higher rpm.
it has to do with when the valve closes it makes a compression wave that travels up to the plenum (place before the runners) and then the wave travels back down. the longer the tube the longer the wave has to travel, and since the wave travels at approximately the same speed no matter what intake you use, the long runners take more time for the wave to travel thus needing more time between valve openings (low rpm) to let the wave help "push" more air into the intake. short runner does not need much time so it needs a less time (more rpm) between valve openings.
if i miss typed or said something wrong please correct me anyone but i think i at least got the jist of it all
Andrew</font>
in short..
long runner length (stock TPI) allows (forces) the peak torque at a lower rpm and so a shorter length (LT1 Miniram) allows (forces) the peak torque at a higher rpm.
it has to do with when the valve closes it makes a compression wave that travels up to the plenum (place before the runners) and then the wave travels back down. the longer the tube the longer the wave has to travel, and since the wave travels at approximately the same speed no matter what intake you use, the long runners take more time for the wave to travel thus needing more time between valve openings (low rpm) to let the wave help "push" more air into the intake. short runner does not need much time so it needs a less time (more rpm) between valve openings.
if i miss typed or said something wrong please correct me anyone but i think i at least got the jist of it all
Andrew</font>
------------------
89 Trans Am Turbo 3.8L All stock 43,000 miles #1053 of 1555
Past Thirdgen:
86 Trans Am w/ built 355TPI with SLP goodies and too much other stuff to List. One sweet *** car, wish I would have had a good enough Job to pay insurance on three cars so I could keep it, but for a 89 Turbo Trans Am w/ Low miles, I think I made the right choice!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




