LB9 vs LG4 heads
LB9 vs LG4 heads
I am looking into converting an LG4 performance motor into a TPI motor in my race car.
First thing I need to figure out is what heads to use.
The LG4 is from a 82 or 83 Z28. I am assuming the heads are 58cc, right?
And valve sizes are 1.84/1.50.
Also I have heard these are close to 167cc intake ports.
Which all sounds pretty much identical to the 081 centerbolt LB9 TPI heads.
So - question is, any advantage to switch to the TPI heads, or will the LG4 heads work just as well?
I am limited to stock heads, so I can't port them or go to any aftermarket head.
First thing I need to figure out is what heads to use.
The LG4 is from a 82 or 83 Z28. I am assuming the heads are 58cc, right?
And valve sizes are 1.84/1.50.
Also I have heard these are close to 167cc intake ports.
Which all sounds pretty much identical to the 081 centerbolt LB9 TPI heads.
So - question is, any advantage to switch to the TPI heads, or will the LG4 heads work just as well?
I am limited to stock heads, so I can't port them or go to any aftermarket head.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 27
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
Yeah they're pretty much the same except the change from perimeter bolt valve covers to center bolt valve covers.
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
not quite true - I found some flow data for both that suggests that the 081 heads flow 20cfm better on the intake side.
Also - I have empirical data from somebody who dyno'ed with the 187 heads and the smaller 305 cam and made 197hp, then switched to the 081 heads and larger cam and retested - pulled 232hp, so it was worth 35hp. Also the power curve died after 3500rpm with the smaller cam / heads and had a good 1000-1500 more useable RPM with the bigger cam / 081 heads. Hard to say how much was heads vs. the cam, but I am not taking any chances and will just go with the 081 heads to be sure. The port design is also a bit different and optimized for TPI, so that should work better as a system.
Also - I have empirical data from somebody who dyno'ed with the 187 heads and the smaller 305 cam and made 197hp, then switched to the 081 heads and larger cam and retested - pulled 232hp, so it was worth 35hp. Also the power curve died after 3500rpm with the smaller cam / heads and had a good 1000-1500 more useable RPM with the bigger cam / 081 heads. Hard to say how much was heads vs. the cam, but I am not taking any chances and will just go with the 081 heads to be sure. The port design is also a bit different and optimized for TPI, so that should work better as a system.
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 456
Likes: 4
From: Concordia, MO, USA
Car: 89 Formula, WS6
Engine: LB9/peanut cam :(
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
LB9's and LG4's should have the same head. The only difference should be the valve covers/manifold bolts, which changed from 86->87, not from LG4<->LB9
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 510
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
I have taken apart stock LG4s from 1987-1988 Caprices that had 187s heads. I have also seen 1987-1988 Monte Carlos with 081s on the L69 and 187s on the LG4.
416s were used on the following
1982-1986 305 LG4
1982-1986 305 L69
1985-1986 305 Lb9
1982-1986 305 LF3 Truck
601s were used on the following
1982-1984 305 LU3 Crossfire
1981-1986 305 LE9 Truck
1979-1981 267
I have also seen alot of 1992 era trucks that had 081/083 heads on them stock. GM using up excess stock?
416s were used on the following
1982-1986 305 LG4
1982-1986 305 L69
1985-1986 305 Lb9
1982-1986 305 LF3 Truck
601s were used on the following
1982-1984 305 LU3 Crossfire
1981-1986 305 LE9 Truck
1979-1981 267
I have also seen alot of 1992 era trucks that had 081/083 heads on them stock. GM using up excess stock?
Trending Topics
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
It is a spec class with stock motors in NASA called CMC - Camaro Mustang Challenge. Road racing. We get about 15-20 cars per event in CA, so there are plenty of people to race!! Very popular series with great driving and competition.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 510
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 27
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
You're probably correct, but since this is a thirdgen website, so what came on Caprices and Monte Carlo's isnt relevant. I would agree GM used up whatever stock they had left, using the good stuff on better cars and the rest on other cars.
The Camaro-Mustang Challenge is a lot of fun! I've been out to their races several times helping my friend Nick Steel. They're limited to 230 RWHP and 300 RWTQ, but there's no limit on area under the curve. I still wouldnt know which heads are better, but the new-tech guy in me would say to use the newer heads.
The Camaro-Mustang Challenge is a lot of fun! I've been out to their races several times helping my friend Nick Steel. They're limited to 230 RWHP and 300 RWTQ, but there's no limit on area under the curve. I still wouldnt know which heads are better, but the new-tech guy in me would say to use the newer heads.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 510
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads
You're probably correct, but since this is a thirdgen website, so what came on Caprices and Monte Carlo's isnt relevant. I would agree GM used up whatever stock they had left, using the good stuff on better cars and the rest on other cars.
The Camaro-Mustang Challenge is a lot of fun! I've been out to their races several times helping my friend Nick Steel. They're limited to 230 RWHP and 300 RWTQ, but there's no limit on area under the curve. I still wouldnt know which heads are better, but the new-tech guy in me would say to use the newer heads.
The Camaro-Mustang Challenge is a lot of fun! I've been out to their races several times helping my friend Nick Steel. They're limited to 230 RWHP and 300 RWTQ, but there's no limit on area under the curve. I still wouldnt know which heads are better, but the new-tech guy in me would say to use the newer heads.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92projectcamaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 18, 2016 08:00 AM










