TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LB9... Is it really that slow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
Aarons92Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1994 Mazda 626
Engine: 305 TBI V8 / 2.0 4-cyl.
Transmission: 700R4 / I have no idea
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 / I don't know
LB9... Is it really that slow?

Okay, here's the deal, I have a '92 RS that has a 305 TBI. The computer has timing issues on it, so I figured I should stop wasting money on that motor and buy a friends LB9 motor and 700R4 swap. He has the whole swap, the harness, everything needed and it's got 70,000 adult driven miles on it. He's asking $1,500. He did tell me the heads were just redone and the valve seals, and seems to think that it is making 230hp.

I doubt that, he didn't do anything too drastic.

My question is...

190hp sounds really whimpy... I'm affraid that after the swap is in my car, it will be hardly enough to beat a Honda Civic. Can anyone here tell me what an LB9 can do? How fast is one? Does it feel slow?

I have thought about mods, maybe headers, intake runners, cold air intake, a chip... I have a budget of about $1,500 for mods. Any suggestions?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
91z 2 8's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg PA
Car: 04 Jetta
Engine: 1.8t AWP
Transmission: 5spd
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Lots of ppl think their weak sauce but i think its pretty fast car my stock with a cut off exhaust stomped a 07 v6 tiburon with mods that was 6 spd and mines auto. Youll eat civics alive unless their boosted. I wouldnt pay 1500 for that swap tho, that seems expensive if your gonna shell out that much might of well just do a 350.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
Aarons92Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1994 Mazda 626
Engine: 305 TBI V8 / 2.0 4-cyl.
Transmission: 700R4 / I have no idea
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 / I don't know
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by 91z 2 8
Lots of ppl think their weak sauce but i think its pretty fast car my stock with a cut off exhaust stomped a 07 v6 tiburon with mods that was 6 spd and mines auto. Youll eat civics alive unless their boosted. I wouldnt pay 1500 for that swap tho, that seems expensive if your gonna shell out that much might of well just do a 350.
I think he'll take $1,200... what do you think it's worth?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #4  
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

My LB9 runs low 8's in the 1/8th mile and makes 260 rwhp/ 404 rwtq. That is far from slow considering most third gens run 9's and slower. A few bolt ons and a 75 shot is all it took. Building a 355 to replace it though, should be in the 7's with a 100 shot for sure.

I would take the $1500 and just start on a build of a 350 and find a TPI swap. Its not like GM didn't produce a ton of TPI cars so the intake setups/wiring/sensors are not rare or expensive.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #5  
Toyota h8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: toledo
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

a lb9 swap could be had for far cheaper.

but like others have said, for that much do a l98 swap....you'll thank us later

but lb9s have seen 13's....but most fast 305's seeing 12's or higher are carb for a reason
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #6  
Aarons92Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1994 Mazda 626
Engine: 305 TBI V8 / 2.0 4-cyl.
Transmission: 700R4 / I have no idea
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 / I don't know
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by WhiteIrocZ
My LB9 runs low 8's in the 1/8th mile and makes 260 rwhp/ 404 rwtq. That is far from slow considering most third gens run 9's and slower. A few bolt ons and a 75 shot is all it took. Building a 355 to replace it though, should be in the 7's with a 100 shot for sure.

I would take the $1500 and just start on a build of a 350 and find a TPI swap. Its not like GM didn't produce a ton of TPI cars so the intake setups/wiring/sensors are not rare or expensive.
You must have one hell of a stall converter to be running 400+TQ on 260HP. What mods are you running? Gears?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #7  
Aarons92Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1994 Mazda 626
Engine: 305 TBI V8 / 2.0 4-cyl.
Transmission: 700R4 / I have no idea
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 / I don't know
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

L98 would be fun... but my car is a daily driver... I go about 60 miles a day... I need to get good mileage! And an L98 would throw my t-tops lol.

Last edited by Aarons92Maro; Dec 9, 2008 at 12:22 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:23 AM
  #8  
Toyota h8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: toledo
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Aarons92Maro
L98 would be fun... but this my car is a daily driver... I go about 60 miles a day... I need to get good mileage!
meh if you drove the l98 like a normal person at freeway speeds it would get same or better than the lb9 due to more horsepower t over come drag caused by wind resistance.

Heck, my friend thats got a 383tpi car gets just as good of gas mpg as he did with mod'd lb9 lol
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #9  
david068513's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
From: Ganiesville GA
Car: 1992 z28/1992 RS heritage edition
Engine: 350 tpi, 305 tbi
Transmission: 700R4,T5
Axle/Gears: G92
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Toyota h8r
meh if you drove the l98 like a normal person at freeway speeds it would get same or better than the lb9 due to more horsepower t over come drag caused by wind resistance.

Heck, my friend thats got a 383tpi car gets just as good of gas mpg as he did with mod'd lb9 lol
I daily drive my Modded L98. ported slp runners,ported base,ported SD intake,vortec heads,magnaflow catback. I still get around 17 to 18 on the highway and I dont drive easy.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 01:24 AM
  #10  
RevItUpZ28's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: '91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 383 Vortec HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700-R4;Vig 4000 stall
Axle/Gears: Moser M9 9" / 3.89
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

I wouldn't waste the money on a Hypertech chip. I would do mods that would transfer over to a L98 later on down the road such as headers/exhaust/gears. If I remember correctly, my buddy's old 91 camaro rs 305 TBI car had 3.73's, 3" catback, etc and was only running 15.0's in the 1/4. (Stock for him was like 16.2) My car back when it was a stock 305 LB9 with a 3" catback and k&n air filters was running a 14.9 in the 1/4 and had 198rwhp/262rwtq.

Yeah, the LB9 would be a good paltform to start with, but eventually you'll want that 350. And its better to swap in a 350 once those other supporting mods are there.

Last edited by RevItUpZ28; Dec 9, 2008 at 01:27 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 01:45 AM
  #11  
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Aarons92Maro
You must have one hell of a stall converter to be running 400+TQ on 260HP. What mods are you running? Gears?
Precision 2500rpm stall speed converter, full exhaust, 3.42 gears. A few other bolt on's, nothing major. Peanut cam. 75 shot out of a single nozzle (42 nitrous pill).

404 ft lbs is due to what some call "torque spike" with nitrous, but it didn't "spike" at all. It actually maintained high torque for a while.

These numbers were achieve at 10.5:1 Air/Fuel ratio. I have since leaned it out and the car feels much stronger.

Hasn't seen the dyno again yet. Now concentrating on a 355 setup that is currently a new thread that you guys are free to give me some input on.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #12  
bjankuski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Glenbeulah, WI
Car: 1988 Firbird
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

What year LB9 is it, the 1990 and latter LB9 with the high flow exhaust manifolds were rated at 230 HP and run very well.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:54 AM
  #13  
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Aarons92Maro
Does it feel slow?
It doesn't feel slow out of the hole with a decent sized converter and a 3.42 gear, but then it falls on its face.

Spray it for a while and have a blast, but then you'll want more, and filling bottles just to have a good time on the street gets really old at $4 a pound.

I can't see buying an LB9/ 700r4 combo for $1500, you could probably find a wrecked 350 TPI car for that and swap everything out of it.

BTW, that 190hp is to the flywheel, not to the wheels, and that is in perfect running condition. If you were to put it on a dyno, look for around 150 rwhp, and that is also in perfect running condition. I never dynoed my car on motor but I would predict it would probably put down 190 rwhp with full bolt on's including RR's.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #14  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

You dont need half of what hes selling. The lower half of the motor is the same as yours.

You can find TPI intakes w/harness for about 400'ish. Your choice of heads. Dont even have to pull the motor. Then possibly some headers or other goods.

The main thing for mpg is drive reasonable. Then tune tune tune on the prom chip.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 12:52 AM
  #15  
ModPog84z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: montana
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 496 BBC
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by RevItUpZ28
I wouldn't waste the money on a Hypertech chip. I would do mods that would transfer over to a L98 later on down the road such as headers/exhaust/gears. If I remember correctly, my buddy's old 91 camaro rs 305 TBI car had 3.73's, 3" catback, etc and was only running 15.0's in the 1/4. (Stock for him was like 16.2) My car back when it was a stock 305 LB9 with a 3" catback and k&n air filters was running a 14.9 in the 1/4 and had 198rwhp/262rwtq.

Yeah, the LB9 would be a good paltform to start with, but eventually you'll want that 350. And its better to swap in a 350 once those other supporting mods are there.
i have a 91 firebird formula with an LB9, and despite my future plans, i run great in the quarter. i have a comp xt260 cam, 20 lb inj, port matched heads, base, stock runners, ported plenum and a lightly matched throttle body. has cold air intake, 185* thermostat, rebuilt 700r4 w/ stage 2 shift kit and TCI converter 3800 stall, stock 3.73 posi, flowmaster 2 3/4" catback with 40 series. stock bottom end, and i run consistent 12.40's, my best being a 12.37 @ 115.8 with 295 toyo proxies out back and 215's in front. i used to run bosch fusion plugs but recently upgraded to the E3's. definitely helped my around town driving experience and idle quality. i havent been to the track with them in yet, (the weather in the NW has officially hit the *******) but i hope for a slightly quicker et.

my point is that the LB9 can be fast, and yes ive put some money into my car (roughly 2200 in mods), you just need to know how to build them. i blew up my last third gen at the track, an 84 camaro with a 92 LB9 swap in it, but i got greedy and tossed too much juice at it (a 200 dpi shot with all stock except the runners, TB and rear end) and blew a couple pistons to hell. before the 200 it ran low 12s on a 100 shot.

neway, they can be fast, but if your looking for easy, low maintenance good performance, then build a nice 350 or find an L98. you can get one as cheap as your buddys, and youll be a hell of a lot happier.

ps- my firebird is getting a built 350 motor this next summer and a 6 speed. the drag strip is no longer fun for me, auto cross and hotrod cruise here i come.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 07:10 AM
  #16  
RevItUpZ28's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: '91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 383 Vortec HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700-R4;Vig 4000 stall
Axle/Gears: Moser M9 9" / 3.89
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by ModPog84z28

ps- my firebird is getting a built 350 motor this next summer and a 6 speed.
That proves my point. Eventually he'll want that L98.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #17  
FormulaL98's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: Columbus
Car: 88 Formula, 72 Nova, 68 Chevelle
Engine: L98, mild 350, L79 327
Transmission: 700R4, M20, M20
Axle/Gears: 9b 327,10b 373, 12b 331
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Spending 1500 bucks on a LB9 is just something you shouldnt do. If your dead set on having a 305 just swap a TPI set up onto your motor with some heads (even stock L98 would work, cheap too), 100 shot it at the track and get like 27 mpg on the way home. If you want a fresh motor all together, a L98, LT1, even some LS1's can be had for less than 1500.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 03:03 AM
  #18  
Saculia's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Car: currently a 91 G92.
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner WC 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by FormulaL98
Spending 1500 bucks on a LB9 is just something you shouldnt do. If your dead set on having a 305 just swap a TPI set up onto your motor with some heads (even stock L98 would work, cheap too), 100 shot it at the track and get like 27 mpg on the way home. If you want a fresh motor all together, a L98, LT1, even some LS1's can be had for less than 1500.
Stock L98 heads will be a bad idea. They will drop the engine's compression too much due to their larger combustion chambers.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 08:27 AM
  #19  
FormulaL98's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: Columbus
Car: 88 Formula, 72 Nova, 68 Chevelle
Engine: L98, mild 350, L79 327
Transmission: 700R4, M20, M20
Axle/Gears: 9b 327,10b 373, 12b 331
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Saculia
Stock L98 heads will be a bad idea. They will drop the engine's compression too much due to their larger combustion chambers.
My bad, I always forget about the combustion chamber size difference.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #20  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Just get the L98 heads milled, to create a smaller combustion chamber, but be careful of raising the compression ration.

Thicker/thinner head gaskets can help "tune" the compression to where you want it.

Or get Vortec heads. WAY better flow, but then you hafta buy a new intake. Not a big deal, just a little more $ to spend, but stock Vortecs are CHEAP.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #21  
327???'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Stephen
Just get the L98 heads milled, to create a smaller combustion chamber, but be careful of raising the compression ration.

Thicker/thinner head gaskets can help "tune" the compression to where you want it.

Or get Vortec heads. WAY better flow, but then you hafta buy a new intake. Not a big deal, just a little more $ to spend, but stock Vortecs are CHEAP.
Not the best idea, I know we're talking about a basically stock 305 but I'd still rather see higher compression with an .040 quench height than lower compression with a garbage quench.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 12:52 AM
  #22  
Toyota h8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: toledo
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: LB9... Is it really that slow?

Originally Posted by Stephen
Just get the L98 heads milled, to create a smaller combustion chamber, but be careful of raising the compression ration.

Thicker/thinner head gaskets can help "tune" the compression to where you want it.

Or get Vortec heads. WAY better flow, but then you hafta buy a new intake. Not a big deal, just a little more $ to spend, but stock Vortecs are CHEAP.
idk bout milling the heads that far to 58cc or less.......

local race shop told me they wouldnt take my L98 heads down that far because if the heads ever had an issue(piston hitting it or debris....they couldnt mill it anymore and head would be junk. So basically if you sprayed the lb9 and it blew up, you wouldnt have heads for the 350 replacing it
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
Elephantismo
Electronics
14
Feb 13, 2019 12:51 AM
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
Luigytico09
TPI
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.