LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
I was just wondering if you guys believe an LT4 hotcam with 1.6 roller rockers is an appropriate choice for an LB9. I know stock this might be overkill but I plan later down the road on installing a superram base (The plenum is already portmatched to SLP runners) and trickflow super 23 heads.
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: L98 HCI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
If your using stock heads now, you will definitely need new valve springs too. That is way to much lift for the stock ones. They max out at .460-.480 lift at valve.
I think that cam is too much duration for TPI. I wouldn't go past 214-215 duration @.050 for intake.
A good choice would be a Comp XR 264-HR-12 which is .488/.495 (w/1.5 rockers) 212/218 @.050 for duration with 112 LSA. I have that cam in my 92 and I am very happy with it.
Anyway you go with the cam (other than stock) you will need tuning to get the most from it.
I think that cam is too much duration for TPI. I wouldn't go past 214-215 duration @.050 for intake.
A good choice would be a Comp XR 264-HR-12 which is .488/.495 (w/1.5 rockers) 212/218 @.050 for duration with 112 LSA. I have that cam in my 92 and I am very happy with it.
Anyway you go with the cam (other than stock) you will need tuning to get the most from it.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
If your using stock heads now, you will definitely need new valve springs too. That is way to much lift for the stock ones. They max out at .460-.480 lift at valve.
I think that cam is too much duration for TPI. I wouldn't go past 214-215 duration @.050 for intake.
A good choice would be a Comp XR 264-HR-12 which is .488/.495 (w/1.5 rockers) 212/218 @.050 for duration with 112 LSA. I have that cam in my 92 and I am very happy with it.
Anyway you go with the cam (other than stock) you will need tuning to get the most from it.
I think that cam is too much duration for TPI. I wouldn't go past 214-215 duration @.050 for intake.
A good choice would be a Comp XR 264-HR-12 which is .488/.495 (w/1.5 rockers) 212/218 @.050 for duration with 112 LSA. I have that cam in my 92 and I am very happy with it.
Anyway you go with the cam (other than stock) you will need tuning to get the most from it.
Thanks for the recommend. I'll give it a look.
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: L98 HCI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
FYI, Comp has this same grind available with a 110 LSA. If you get this cam get the 112 LSA. It will work better with your computer.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
As far as the ECM, I think a retune is a given with any cam change, so I should be able to properly tune it right?
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: L98 HCI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
If you were using a carb I would say go with the 110 LSA. The extra overlap would give idle you're looking for.
You are exactly right, the idle vacuum would be the problem with using the 110 with TPI.
With the XR-264-12 I have a hair over 16 inches at idle.
As for tuning, read up on DIY tuning on this site. Lots of good links and info.
Good luck with your build up.
You are exactly right, the idle vacuum would be the problem with using the 110 with TPI.
With the XR-264-12 I have a hair over 16 inches at idle.
As for tuning, read up on DIY tuning on this site. Lots of good links and info.
Good luck with your build up.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
If you were using a carb I would say go with the 110 LSA. The extra overlap would give idle you're looking for.
You are exactly right, the idle vacuum would be the problem with using the 110 with TPI.
With the XR-264-12 I have a hair over 16 inches at idle.
As for tuning, read up on DIY tuning on this site. Lots of good links and info.
Good luck with your build up.
You are exactly right, the idle vacuum would be the problem with using the 110 with TPI.
With the XR-264-12 I have a hair over 16 inches at idle.
As for tuning, read up on DIY tuning on this site. Lots of good links and info.
Good luck with your build up.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: L98 HCI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
I am very happy with this cam (XR 264-12). The low end torque is even better than the stock cam. The mid-range is awesome. It pulls hard up top too.
The torque seems to hold on longer and it doesn't fall on its face above 5K. It revs good to 6K now, but I also have a ported Edelbrock base and runners.
The heads. I'm using are World SR Torquers, but I would get the TFS heads if I were building it up again.
With 1.6 rockers this cam has .521/.528 valve lift. I think that's close to the Hot-cam IIRC. The duration is more computer friendly with 212 @.050 on the intake side.
The torque seems to hold on longer and it doesn't fall on its face above 5K. It revs good to 6K now, but I also have a ported Edelbrock base and runners.
The heads. I'm using are World SR Torquers, but I would get the TFS heads if I were building it up again.
With 1.6 rockers this cam has .521/.528 valve lift. I think that's close to the Hot-cam IIRC. The duration is more computer friendly with 212 @.050 on the intake side.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 965
Likes: 2
From: SE, Ohio
Car: '86 Z28, '91 RS
Engine: 305ci, 305ci
Transmission: TH200c (no kidding), TH700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 2.73
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
With your stall/rear the hotcam would be OK. It would want to shift around 6k. It would also give you something to grow into and work wonders with those TFS 175's and upgraded TPI.
The springs are not the lift limiting factor it's the clearance between the valve seal and the retainer. The stock springs are crap though and have a hard enough time handling stock cams so they need to go. Z06 Ls valve springs are the way to go. They don't carry that "vette" price tag so don't be wary, they are cheaper and better then aftermarket springs at this level. They are like $50 a set. Get the retainers and locks too.
Don't build you're 305 for torque build it for HP.
The springs are not the lift limiting factor it's the clearance between the valve seal and the retainer. The stock springs are crap though and have a hard enough time handling stock cams so they need to go. Z06 Ls valve springs are the way to go. They don't carry that "vette" price tag so don't be wary, they are cheaper and better then aftermarket springs at this level. They are like $50 a set. Get the retainers and locks too.
Don't build you're 305 for torque build it for HP.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
With your stall/rear the hotcam would be OK. It would want to shift around 6k. It would also give you something to grow into and work wonders with those TFS 175's and upgraded TPI.
The springs are not the lift limiting factor it's the clearance between the valve seal and the retainer. The stock springs are crap though and have a hard enough time handling stock cams so they need to go. Z06 Ls valve springs are the way to go. They don't carry that "vette" price tag so don't be wary, they are cheaper and better then aftermarket springs at this level. They are like $50 a set. Get the retainers and locks too.
Don't build you're 305 for torque build it for HP.
The springs are not the lift limiting factor it's the clearance between the valve seal and the retainer. The stock springs are crap though and have a hard enough time handling stock cams so they need to go. Z06 Ls valve springs are the way to go. They don't carry that "vette" price tag so don't be wary, they are cheaper and better then aftermarket springs at this level. They are like $50 a set. Get the retainers and locks too.
Don't build you're 305 for torque build it for HP.
I should probably mention I intend on swapping out different rear gears. I was planning 4.10 this car used to be a DD so at one time those gears were not feasible but it has since been retired to project/weekend cruiser with an occasional trip to the strip.
You don't think that's too much lift for a 305? I was told anything over .500 is excessive.
That comp cam also will not work with my engine without a retro fit kit. I have a flat tappet valvetrain.
Last edited by FireDemonSiC; Nov 24, 2010 at 12:33 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 965
Likes: 2
From: SE, Ohio
Car: '86 Z28, '91 RS
Engine: 305ci, 305ci
Transmission: TH200c (no kidding), TH700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 2.73
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
The hotcam is roller too though.
No it's not too much for a 305. The lift limit is as I described before, it has nothing to do with cubes. On my '86 305 heads it was .480 max lift with the stock setup. Aftermarket retainers with standard locks brought it to +.500. With the stock retainers a set of +.050 locks would work too.
Z06 valve springs install at 1.8 (that's .1 higher then stock) you should have plenty of clearance. I'm not sure that would be enough pressure for a flat tappet though.
Why not just copy one of the awesome 305 builds already documented on TGO? The 356RWHP TPI with your stall and gearing would be just nasty.
No it's not too much for a 305. The lift limit is as I described before, it has nothing to do with cubes. On my '86 305 heads it was .480 max lift with the stock setup. Aftermarket retainers with standard locks brought it to +.500. With the stock retainers a set of +.050 locks would work too.
Z06 valve springs install at 1.8 (that's .1 higher then stock) you should have plenty of clearance. I'm not sure that would be enough pressure for a flat tappet though.
Why not just copy one of the awesome 305 builds already documented on TGO? The 356RWHP TPI with your stall and gearing would be just nasty.
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: L98 HCI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: LT4 hotcam in an LB9?
[QUOTE
That comp cam also will not work with my engine without a retro fit kit. I have a flat tappet valvetrain.[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry, I thought you had a later 1pc block since you were considering the hot-cam
That comp cam also will not work with my engine without a retro fit kit. I have a flat tappet valvetrain.[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry, I thought you had a later 1pc block since you were considering the hot-cam
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TX-SleeperC5
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 24, 2015 03:13 PM






