TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 04:26 PM
  #1  
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

As part of my rebuild, I have removed all emissions and have also removed the chorcoal canister.

What to do with the line? Can it be eliminated all together and capped at the tank?

Does it need to remain as a vent, and if so, can I just add a breather filter to it near the tank?


Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
Lewspike69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Ct
Car: 1983 Camaro
Engine: 385 stoker
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt Torsen Posi 3.73 ratio
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Have the same question! subscribed for an answer.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 06:14 PM
  #3  
pound's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 9
From: Beautiful Coastal New Jersey
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn posi 3.73
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

I believe it needs to remain as a vent. I just got a differential breather and put that on the end of the line near where the charcoal canister used to be.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 06:46 PM
  #4  
ASE doc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 29
From: Aurora, OR
Car: 87 IROC Z28
Engine: 355 cid TPI
Transmission: Custom Built 700R4 w/3,500 stall
Axle/Gears: QP fab 9" 3.70 Truetrac
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

I attached a 24" piece of rubber hose and secured it so that the fumes vent behind and below the headlamp housing. Need it open to vent the tank.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 07:49 PM
  #5  
88fastgta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

so there is no harmful effects of getting rid of the charcoal canister... I have this hooked up but want to get rid of it....
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 09:14 PM
  #6  
aremy10's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 271
Likes: 3
From: sturgeon bay wisconsin
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

mine is blocked off and I us a vented gas cap

Last edited by aremy10; Apr 15, 2013 at 10:01 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 10:05 PM
  #7  
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Is the little white fuel filter looking item above the rear end attached to the tank on one side, a vent for the tank?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 11:14 PM
  #8  
T/Aperformance's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 553
Likes: 1
From: Ballwin, MO
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 5 speed
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Originally Posted by Johnny Blaze
Is the little white fuel filter looking item above the rear end attached to the tank on one side, a vent for the tank?
It is a vent but a one way vent that allows air to enter the tank and not create a vacuum as fuel is used,
The charcoal canister and the hole fuel system needs to have a slight pressure in the tank, the way the system is set up it allows fuel vapors and pressure to be released back into the engine to be combusted, To much pressure in the fuel tank or to little pressure will cause the fuel pump to go bad prematurely, This is how the complete fuel system was designed so fuel vapors would not escape into the atmosphere, But I'm sure you know this as most people do.
Now my question is why you want to do this? If it is to clean up your engine bay I would suggest hiding it under the plate it sits on right now. There is plenty of room and there are some on this site that have already done this, And there is a thread showing how it was done, But I can't find it right now.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 01:19 AM
  #9  
Bddbrd86's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Papillion NE
Car: !986 Firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Here is a post that might answer your question?
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/carb...-pressure.html
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 06:03 AM
  #10  
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

My canister was removed years ago.

I don't think you can buy replacement units.

I would like to avoid replacing it, due to cost, avalibility, and I do like the cleaner appearence without it.

The link did not seem to definitive, it appears sone have luck capping it and adding a vented gas cap, while others just put a filter on it.

I would be willing to bet a large portion of the cars here do not have thr canisters still. Would be interested in hearing what many have done when removing them.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 12:02 AM
  #11  
T/Aperformance's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 553
Likes: 1
From: Ballwin, MO
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 5 speed
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Originally Posted by Johnny Blaze
My canister was removed years ago.

I don't think you can buy replacement units.

I would like to avoid replacing it, due to cost, avalibility, and I do like the cleaner appearence without it.

The link did not seem to definitive, it appears sone have luck capping it and adding a vented gas cap, while others just put a filter on it.

I would be willing to bet a large portion of the cars here do not have thr canisters still. Would be interested in hearing what many have done when removing them.
I was faced with the same situation when I bought my T/A. The charcoal canister had bean removed, And even though my car does not get emission test, all the controls for it must be there or it wont pass, I found a few on ebay but didn't like there price, I found one in the salvage yard for $10. with all vacuum lines. Maybe you could check out the parts for sale on this forum as there a re a few people parting out whole cars.
If you want to go without the canister you could always hook up the vent line up to the TB, but this may put a vacuum in the tank, Now there is a valve that is on top of the canister that is removable that is controlled by vacuum Have the vent from the tank plugged into that, A vacuum line from the intake to control when it opens and the line out to the TB, this way you have a clean appearance with out the charcoal canister and the fuel vapors from the tank still being burnt off by the engine and saving your fuel pump
Reply
Old May 27, 2013 | 11:30 AM
  #12  
Sidethumper's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Bay City,Michigan
Car: 87 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: Lapouttre Racing 350
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r4 Mild shift kit
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23 posi w/disc brakes
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Originally Posted by Johnny Blaze
Is the little white fuel filter looking item above the rear end attached to the tank on one side, a vent for the tank?
Originally Posted by T/Aperformance
It is a vent but a one way vent that allows air to enter the tank and not create a vacuum as fuel is used,
The charcoal canister and the hole fuel system needs to have a slight pressure in the tank, the way the system is set up it allows fuel vapors and pressure to be released back into the engine to be combusted, To much pressure in the fuel tank or to little pressure will cause the fuel pump to go bad prematurely, This is how the complete fuel system was designed so fuel vapors would not escape into the atmosphere, But I'm sure you know this as most people do.
Now my question is why you want to do this? If it is to clean up your engine bay I would suggest hiding it under the plate it sits on right now. There is plenty of room and there are some on this site that have already done this, And there is a thread showing how it was done, But I can't find it right now.
If the tank needs slight pressure, how can that vapor line be open or used for a vent ? Will that not allow the tank to have any pressure at all by allowing any pressure to escape?

I also deleted my entire vapor line all the way to the tank.. I have been told to plug that rubber line from the tank and also been told to keep it open. So I put a filter on the end of the hose and will try it like that first, If that don't work well I guess I will plug it. I have yet to fire the new motor but should have an answer in a week or two when I fire it for the first time.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2013 | 02:55 PM
  #13  
darbysan's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Car: 1985 El Camino Choo Choo
Engine: L31 Crate 350 w/ TPI
Transmission: GN 200-4r
Axle/Gears: GN 8.5 3.73
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

It is normal for the gas tank to have 2psi positive pressure. This makes the pump work "easier". The pressure actually primes the pump. The pressure is created by the return flow fro the regulator. There is a check valve in the vent line just before the charcoal cannister that opens when the pressure exceeds 2 psi, allowing the fumes to flow to the cannister. The cannister absorbs these fumes, and then releases them back to be burned when the ECM opens the solenoid on the top of the cannister.

For info, my vent line was pinched, not allowing the flow to happen. Pressure would build in the tank to the point that it would puke gas out the filler neck, even with the cap on. If you took the cap off, you could feel pressure exiting the tank for many seconds. I believe that the tank could easily expand ( and maybe even burst a seam) if the pressure gets great enough. I have seen the opposite, when on a carb'd system the vacuum in the tank was large enough to collapse the tank.

Most vented caps "vent" pressure or vacuum only when opened slightly. I believe because of EPA rules it is now illegal to make a cap that actually vents while installed ( at least for our age of vehicles)
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #14  
Ed1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 19
From: Westminster, MD USA
Car: 91 Firebird 'vert, 91 Formula
Engine: 5.7, 5.0
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn w/ 3.73's, 3.42
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Originally Posted by Johnny Blaze
As part of my rebuild, I have removed all emissions and have also removed the chorcoal canister.

What to do with the line? Can it be eliminated all together and capped at the tank?

Does it need to remain as a vent, and if so, can I just add a breather filter to it near the tank?


Thanks!
Did you come up with a solution?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 10:02 PM
  #15  
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

My car is still in pieces.

My plan is to add a vent filter like the factory one.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2013 | 09:17 AM
  #16  
akanitro's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 475
Likes: 8
From: Houston, TX
Car: 1989 GTA, 2004 Z06, 2008 Expedition
Engine: L98, LS3, 5.4L
Transmission: 700R4, MN6, Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23, 3.42, ?
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Now this is just for TPI cars. So leave he vent valve installed on the line up front and on the other end use a longer hose and route it down to the wheel well by the tire so it vents outside if there is any vapor. Or if you removed the entire vapor line, install the pressure vent valve back near the tank and run the dump hose to the rear of the vehicle so vapors don't build under the vehicle. That way you still have what GM designed with 2 psi constant tank pressure and even though it is not emissions legal, the vehicle will work as designed and will not risk blowing a fuel tank or premature wear to the fuel pump.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2013 | 10:35 AM
  #17  
TTOP350's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,223
Likes: 1,148
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

I still have mine in place and working, I hate the raw fuel smell.. Makes me think I have a fuel leak.
Name:  SDC10175.jpg
Views: 16417
Size:  51.1 KB
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 11:34 AM
  #18  
dmwracing42's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt, Torsen Diff, 3.73's
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

IDK if you've found a solution yet but I did what another member here did. I took that purge valve and some of the rubber line and attached it right after the fuel tank. Zip tied it up right where the hard line meets the flex line on the rear brakes.

That way you still have the purge valve to regulate 2 psi, it doesn't puke fumes when the car is sitting because there's no pressure building, and it's out of the way.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #19  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

I drove my Camaro for 10 years with the charcoal canister removed, with just a piece of fabric over the end of the hard line in the engine compartment. I never once got a fuel smell, and never had fuel problems of any kind. Now that the motor is in my GTA, I'm going to take a similar approach and just use a diff breather after the 2psi valve.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 12:45 PM
  #20  
jakemussman's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
From: WA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Ratio, Torsen LSD
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

My canister has been removed and the line capped off. I am running a standard non vented cap as well. It's been this way for over a year on a daily driver with no issues.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #21  
0078red1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Weatherford TX
Car: 1990 camaro RS
Engine: 1998 ls1. 5.7L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 4th gen rear end for got the gears
Re: Eliminated Charcoal canister, what to do with line?

Any body looking for a canister ?? I might have mine after my ls swap lying around the garage
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F.I. 57 Belair
DFI and ECM
8
Aug 23, 2021 01:09 AM
sahlomonic
Electronics
7
Sep 20, 2015 07:15 PM
ndndndnd
Carburetors
2
Sep 16, 2015 04:13 PM
Glowsock
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 11, 2015 11:09 PM
TBRays98
Tech / General Engine
6
Sep 6, 2015 05:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.