cam advise
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: east los angeles,ca
Car: 1985 iroc-z28
Engine: 305 t.p.i
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
cam advise
hello.im looking into installing a new camshaft.i was just wondering if my ecm would read it or would a custom chip be required.i drive an 85 iroc 305tpi 700r4.i've heard that at times a new cam will not make the car run right or in my case more likely in the 85 year model.any advise is appreciated and thanks in advance.
Member



Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 402
Likes: 10
From: Yorktown, VA
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen rear with 3.42
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: mn
Car: 88 iroc z28 t tops
Engine: 383tpi
Transmission: 700r4 2200 stall HD race pack
Axle/Gears: 342 detroit locker 10 bolt
Re: cam advise
if you add all the high pro acceserys you better know some one to tune it. if you can find a good used cam .050 lift bigger than factory it wont miss it up. you go big cam you need big every thing. and thats a big money bag. i have a .410 roller cam
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,407
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: cam advise
Even the factory calibration left quite a bit of power on the table simply by optimizing the factory setup. I have gained 15-20 ft/lbs of torque at the wheels on any year TPI by recurving the spark tables and leaning out the PE air/fuel ratio.
That being said I have personally run a 272/272 @ .004, 216/216 @ 0.050", .454/.454" lift (.484/.484 w/ 1.6:1 full roller rockers), on a 110* LSA cam (Crane 100052) with the stock chip on a 1986 mass air 305. To keep it from running lean up top I had to push the fuel pressure up to 50 PSI. It ran a little rich down low with the idle/low speed BLMs in the 115 range, but still well under ECM control. I had to adjust the minimum air screw so that I had an IAC count of about 5 at a hot idle in park/neutral. Doing this pushed the TPS voltage out of range, requiring readjustment of the TPS voltage. The engine also responded to an initial timing bump from 6*BTDC stock up to 10* BTDC (36* total advance above 4,800). The car had a set of ported/milled 601' heads with 1.94/1.60 vales, 10:1 static compression, SLP Tri-Y headers on it and matching Y-pipe. Had a set of ASM long tube runners, ported plenum, ported base, throttle body airfoil. Was putting down 240 RWHP/280 RWTQ through a locked 700r4.
That being said I have personally run a 272/272 @ .004, 216/216 @ 0.050", .454/.454" lift (.484/.484 w/ 1.6:1 full roller rockers), on a 110* LSA cam (Crane 100052) with the stock chip on a 1986 mass air 305. To keep it from running lean up top I had to push the fuel pressure up to 50 PSI. It ran a little rich down low with the idle/low speed BLMs in the 115 range, but still well under ECM control. I had to adjust the minimum air screw so that I had an IAC count of about 5 at a hot idle in park/neutral. Doing this pushed the TPS voltage out of range, requiring readjustment of the TPS voltage. The engine also responded to an initial timing bump from 6*BTDC stock up to 10* BTDC (36* total advance above 4,800). The car had a set of ported/milled 601' heads with 1.94/1.60 vales, 10:1 static compression, SLP Tri-Y headers on it and matching Y-pipe. Had a set of ASM long tube runners, ported plenum, ported base, throttle body airfoil. Was putting down 240 RWHP/280 RWTQ through a locked 700r4.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





