No. You'll end up just leaving the P/N switch permanently grounded and it will still run in limp home. Any more questions?

I'm glad you know the facts based on your friends resume. I have seen plenty of people with "qualifications" (like "GM mechanic") who didn't know what they were talking about on stock GM vehicles. Instead of pulling your friends resume out of your pocket all the time, why don't you just post information based on what you know.


<yawn>

Great. Every single one of the TPI & LT1 swaps a friend of mine has done have had VSS. All the LT1's have had VATs. Most have had in-tank pumps. So what? Have you run both scenarios back to back? No. You're just saying "it works." Guess what? It would work better in other ways.

I never said your truck didn't kick tail. I just said there are better ways of doing things than how you do them. Does that make yours inferior? Entirely possible. Does that mean it's 100hp diff? No. When it is obscenely easy to include a VSS (like on 81-up GM vehicles with a 2 pulse VSS right there for you) it's dumb to not include it. In the case of things like airdeanos customers who want simplicity, less wiring, and care more about looks than mpg, then non VSS non EGR setups make sense.

I can make my Q-jets run w/out secondaries on other cars. And I can also say with some confidence that GM doesn't put things on cars unless there's a need. Like VSS.

Oh by *** I did not make any stakes against modifications, so you are on shakier ground than Bin Laden, fool. Check my sig. I have more f-body parts on a Monte than you have VSS pulses.