TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Be Careful Using Non-Bosch MAFs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2020 | 09:47 AM
  #1  
Tootie Pang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 127
From: Los Angeles
Car: 1989 IROC Convertible
Engine: 350 TPI L98
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Be Careful Using Non-Bosch MAFs

Just wanted to relay an important discovery. While tuning my new 350 with Scott Hansen, it was discovered that the aftermarket, "O'Reilly" MAF was the culprit in my rich condition all along. There are many threads on trouble after putting in Bosch D3's. I ended up having the car tuned because they apparently overflowed their rating. Turns out is was this dang MAF the whole time.

The problem with the non-Bosch MAF was that it was just wrong and innaccurate but it wouldn't throw a code though. It was puzzling to Scott, for both separate tunes to try to dial this pretty much stock L98 in as it was, like the previous original, refreshed LB9 running rich. With all his experience, he was perplexed but eventually got the LB9 dialed in. Once he started in on my new L98 with the same MAF and same Bosch D3's he was also having trouble with which would should be an easy tune. I had a functioning original MAF and put it in, mid-tune process, and it made all the difference for the better.

After doing some digging, I found testimony from a tech that works for Bosch that Bosch individually calibrates each hot wire MAF since they all come out slightly different. Their MAF's are accurate and respond quickly to rapid air mass changes. The replacement one I had used did not use the same technology and when looking at the differences I can see why these units could be very poor performers. Even when my LB9 was tuned, it never felt "sharp."

Just wanted to pass that along. Last I heard, Bosch will rebuild and re-calibrate original MAFs that are sent to them.

Here is a pic of the crappy MAF's internals. These will probably cause any engine they are used with to run poorly.




Last edited by Tootie Pang; Apr 19, 2020 at 09:52 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2020 | 10:44 AM
  #2  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,740
Likes: 994
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Be Careful Using Non-Bosch MAFs

Delphi af10320 from RockAuto seems to be a good replacement maf as well.
your definitely right can’t beat the oem Bosch.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2020 | 11:01 AM
  #3  
GeneralDisorder's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,255
Likes: 427
From: Portland, OR
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Be Careful Using Non-Bosch MAFs

With the availability and price of some of these sensors, it makes that much more sense to go speed density.

Sure the initial investment in a quality stand-alone might seem high, but never having to worry about expensive sensor failures, and having powerful tuning and diagnostic capabilities pays for itself over time.

GD
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Finally Got one
Electronics
33
Aug 27, 2016 09:06 AM
Johnstonxj
TPI
28
May 21, 2016 06:50 PM
Fred SS
DIY PROM
5
Nov 25, 2015 10:29 PM
Mark_ZZ3
DIY PROM
1
Oct 8, 2015 09:04 AM
BlackenedBird
Electronics
13
Nov 10, 2011 07:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.