Would a carb type of intake with F.I. installed on it make more power than TPI.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Newark,NJ The state where racing on I 78 rules.
Would a carb type of intake with F.I. installed on it make more power than TPI.
Hello everyone,
My question is:
If i were to use the Fuel Injected carb style intake manifold (similar to Guido's) will it make more power than a TPI set up?Also, has any aftermarket companies made a throttle bracket for this type of set up? I still hate the price of a miniram!
My question is:
If i were to use the Fuel Injected carb style intake manifold (similar to Guido's) will it make more power than a TPI set up?Also, has any aftermarket companies made a throttle bracket for this type of set up? I still hate the price of a miniram!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by KDoggsPimpJetta
from what i understand tpi produces 30% more power than carbs
from what i understand tpi produces 30% more power than carbs
Anyways, back to reality... chances are if you need the extra airflow past what the TPI can support, it will make more power. Below that its probably a tossup or minimal improvement and wouldnt make sense to swap. 383 right? It might not be a bad idea on your car, depending on that cam. I havent looked at the specs of it yet.
I would say that depending on the manifold you choose, you will probably gain hp and loose a little torque. The more important thing about this swap is the shift in the hp/torque curves. You shouldnt run into the 4800rpm breathing problems often associated with stock tpi intakes. I think with your 383 you would probably get a nice real world performance increase. But I doubt you'll get big changes in peak hp on the dyno.
-peace
-peace
Trending Topics
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 432
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, N.Y.
Car: 1986 Camaro Z-28
Engine: Chevy ZZ4
Transmission: Select Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser Axles / 3.73 Richmond Gears
How about a Miniram setup? Then you could have high flow into the upper rpm range and with a 383 down low torque loss wouldn't be a problem. Just another idea to think about.
Do people even read the posts before they reply?
86Tra/maro said "I still hate the price of a miniram!" in his original post. I would think he/she would have considered it already.
Back to the topic, which manifolds have you considered? Any?
86Tra/maro said "I still hate the price of a miniram!" in his original post. I would think he/she would have considered it already.
Back to the topic, which manifolds have you considered? Any?
Depends on where you want to make power. Below 4500 RPM, it's almost impossible to make as much torque as a TPI. I'm assuming, however, that since you're looking at a mini-ram, you want more upper RPM power. Essentially then, the answer is yes. Any single plane carb intake manifold will make more power at 5000+ RPM than a TPI (assuming your heads and cam can support horsepower at this RPM level).
You will give up some low end torque, the biggest difference will be around 3200-3500 RPM. Depending on what kind of carb manifold you use, you might lose as little as 10-20 ft-lbs or as much as 60-70. But once again, there will be no comparison between the two on the top end. The single plane manifold will kill the TPI, and produce numbers more comparable to a mini-ram.
I don't know how the two compare exactly. I guess that also depends on which manifold you use. I never really looked into using a single plane manifold for my motor, but I looked at TPI vs. Mini-ram vs. Super Ram extensively. What I eventually decided was that if you displace less than 400 cubes and you don't rev it to more than 5200 or 5300 RPM, an upgraded TPI is your best bet. If you plan to spend any time at 5200+ then the mini-ram, or single plane will work better. And of course the higher you rev, the bigger the difference will be. Hope some of this helps.
Willie C.
You will give up some low end torque, the biggest difference will be around 3200-3500 RPM. Depending on what kind of carb manifold you use, you might lose as little as 10-20 ft-lbs or as much as 60-70. But once again, there will be no comparison between the two on the top end. The single plane manifold will kill the TPI, and produce numbers more comparable to a mini-ram.
I don't know how the two compare exactly. I guess that also depends on which manifold you use. I never really looked into using a single plane manifold for my motor, but I looked at TPI vs. Mini-ram vs. Super Ram extensively. What I eventually decided was that if you displace less than 400 cubes and you don't rev it to more than 5200 or 5300 RPM, an upgraded TPI is your best bet. If you plan to spend any time at 5200+ then the mini-ram, or single plane will work better. And of course the higher you rev, the bigger the difference will be. Hope some of this helps.
Willie C.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 432
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, N.Y.
Car: 1986 Camaro Z-28
Engine: Chevy ZZ4
Transmission: Select Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser Axles / 3.73 Richmond Gears
I must have read too fast and missed the end.
It was a mistake, relax
It was a mistake, relax
One thing I didn't see mentioned here is the cost of converting a carb style manifold to FI. You may want to check that, 'cause last I checked it's pretty expensive as well by the time all the machine work is done, you've got the fuel rails, throttle body, and getting it to work with the stock computer.
John
John
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Im doing to do the same thing using a edlebrock air-gap manifold,injector bungs are about $60 plus welding $50-$100 or i might just get this from holley
Last edited by e-man; Jan 21, 2002 at 07:50 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Newark,NJ The state where racing on I 78 rules.
Sorry no pictures yet! Car has to be painted. Eman, how much is it for that intake with the fuel rails installed from Holley? That's one of the intakes I was considering for my car. Does anyone know if a throttle bracket is made for the "ELBOW"? & Who sells the elbow?
I converted a Weiand EFI Tunnel Ram base (link below) last summer - heres a quick rundown - also I'm a complete novice at this
tunnel ram base 260
holley fuel rails 20ea
sheet metal box intake 30 in materials
I drilled out the injector holes (drill press $100) on the base and fuel rails - used a dremel tool with 300 and 600 grit sand paper to get dimensions correct
I could not use the fuel rail mounting post on the base so I cut them off and fabbed a bolt on fuel rail mounting similar to 82z's pic of the same
I made a throttle bracket, then bought fuel lines , fpr etc
yep it was a lot of work but like I said I had no clue going into this and once I decided there was NO turning back
It works great -no leaks- more power than my 350 ever made and there has to be more because I have a fast chip burned for the LTR setup I had before- I'll work it out
http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...MSM/f5954.html
hth
92TA 350 AFR58cc LPE 219/525 1.6rr dual exhaust with hooker long Xpipe dynomax bullets Tremec 3.73 walbro pump
tunnel ram base 260
holley fuel rails 20ea
sheet metal box intake 30 in materials
I drilled out the injector holes (drill press $100) on the base and fuel rails - used a dremel tool with 300 and 600 grit sand paper to get dimensions correct
I could not use the fuel rail mounting post on the base so I cut them off and fabbed a bolt on fuel rail mounting similar to 82z's pic of the same
I made a throttle bracket, then bought fuel lines , fpr etc
yep it was a lot of work but like I said I had no clue going into this and once I decided there was NO turning back
It works great -no leaks- more power than my 350 ever made and there has to be more because I have a fast chip burned for the LTR setup I had before- I'll work it out
http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...MSM/f5954.html
hth
92TA 350 AFR58cc LPE 219/525 1.6rr dual exhaust with hooker long Xpipe dynomax bullets Tremec 3.73 walbro pump
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
The manifod is $270,fuel rail is $200 it comes with cross-over tubes,regulater and fittings.Accel sells the elbow around $250 no throttle bracket.I made my own elbow out of a 2" carb spacer($26) and a tuned port plenum(used $75) that I cut in half and cut the bottom out.Welded the spacer to the bottom and a plate to the back of the plenum($50).I can use the a stock TPI throttle bracket because when I cut the plenum I did it right behind the mounting holes.
I have thought about this idea using a Weiand Team G manifold, drilling it for 8 injectors and fuel rails, but what are you using for butterflies or throttle plates on top of the manifold? And what are elbows? Where this idea needs some more advice is the Throttle plates that control the air flow has to have places for throttle position sensor,etc so that you fool the computer into thinking there is still a TPI unit there. How do you do this? Just to answer another question the stock TPI unit will not cover the intake ports in my Aluminum heads.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
The elbow bolts to the top of the (carb style)manifold and bends forward then the TPI throttle body bolts to the front of the elbow.That way you have all your sensers.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Anybody see that incredible 69 Camaro with the custom built suspension last year in CHP and just about every other magazine on the planet? He modified a TPI plenum to sit right on top of a dual 4bbl intake. Made a TON of power. It just got me thinking about the feasibility of doing something like that or fabbing up a sheet metal base that you could plunk a modified TPI plenum on. Hmm. This might wind up being easier (albiet slightly more expensive) than the LT1 swap, and would sure be unique!
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
Anybody see that incredible 69 Camaro with the custom built suspension last year in CHP and just about every other magazine on the planet? He modified a TPI plenum to sit right on top of a dual 4bbl intake. Made a TON of power. It just got me thinking about the feasibility of doing something like that or fabbing up a sheet metal base that you could plunk a modified TPI plenum on. Hmm. This might wind up being easier (albiet slightly more expensive) than the LT1 swap, and would sure be unique!
Anybody see that incredible 69 Camaro with the custom built suspension last year in CHP and just about every other magazine on the planet? He modified a TPI plenum to sit right on top of a dual 4bbl intake. Made a TON of power. It just got me thinking about the feasibility of doing something like that or fabbing up a sheet metal base that you could plunk a modified TPI plenum on. Hmm. This might wind up being easier (albiet slightly more expensive) than the LT1 swap, and would sure be unique!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM




