B&m + Th700r4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Wa
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8 (the cruiser)
Transmission: 700R4 (TransGo Kit, VetteServo)
Axle/Gears: 3.42
B&m + Th700r4
Just wondering, what is your guys opinion on the B&M's 700R4 crate trans from their website? I'm looking for a good 700R4 (new or remaned) to rig to a new 350 that I want to drop into my current 89 RS that currently still has a 2.8 and a bad trans.
Mostly just wondering what people have had in experiences with B&M and their rebuilt transmissions?
-Dan
http://camaro.oldbattery.com
Mostly just wondering what people have had in experiences with B&M and their rebuilt transmissions?
-Dan

http://camaro.oldbattery.com
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Wa
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8 (the cruiser)
Transmission: 700R4 (TransGo Kit, VetteServo)
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Cool thanks, Probuilt seems to be a few hundred cheaper on the costs as well. Also, could I go with the same drive axle say if I wanted to use the TH350? I hear vs. the 700R4, you loose overdrive, but as I am tight on money at the moment I was just wondering.
-Dan
-Dan
Originally posted by nadster
Cool thanks, Probuilt seems to be a few hundred cheaper on the costs as well. Also, could I go with the same drive axle say if I wanted to use the TH350? I hear vs. the 700R4, you loose overdrive, but as I am tight on money at the moment I was just wondering.
-Dan
Cool thanks, Probuilt seems to be a few hundred cheaper on the costs as well. Also, could I go with the same drive axle say if I wanted to use the TH350? I hear vs. the 700R4, you loose overdrive, but as I am tight on money at the moment I was just wondering.
-Dan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





