3.42 or 3.73 for IROC
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Ft.Bragg, NC
Car: 1989 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: moser 28spline/Auburn posi w/ 3.73
3.42 or 3.73 for IROC
I have an 1989 Iroc that has a 3.08 posi in it and I want to drop a new rear end gear in it to help my acceleration and 1/4 times out. Do you guys think I should go with a 3.42 or 3.73 rear end gear? As of now i'm leaning towards 3.73 because that is what my dad has in his camaro and it still tops out at 140mph and its only a 4 speed.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
A 3.73 gear will get you off the line pretty quick (I know, I have them) but with a TPI motor, I'd suggest the 3.42 gear. A typical TPI motor goes athsmatic after 4500 rpm, but makes truck-loads of torque below that. My 350 is the same way, no top end, and with the 3.73s, it just runs out of gear way too quickly. I think you'd be happier with the 3.42 gears.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by Air_Adam
A 3.73 gear will get you off the line pretty quick (I know, I have them) but with a TPI motor, I'd suggest the 3.42 gear. A typical TPI motor goes athsmatic after 4500 rpm, but makes truck-loads of torque below that. My 350 is the same way, no top end, and with the 3.73s, it just runs out of gear way too quickly. I think you'd be happier with the 3.42 gears.
A 3.73 gear will get you off the line pretty quick (I know, I have them) but with a TPI motor, I'd suggest the 3.42 gear. A typical TPI motor goes athsmatic after 4500 rpm, but makes truck-loads of torque below that. My 350 is the same way, no top end, and with the 3.73s, it just runs out of gear way too quickly. I think you'd be happier with the 3.42 gears.
Banned
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
you got a stick? hell you could go higher if im not mistaken... my GTA came stock with 3.45s and ive seen people running over 4.**s with their manuals. i think thats with the t-56 though
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by Kontrax
you got a stick? hell you could go higher if im not mistaken... my GTA came stock with 3.45s and ive seen people running over 4.**s with their manuals. i think thats with the t-56 though
you got a stick? hell you could go higher if im not mistaken... my GTA came stock with 3.45s and ive seen people running over 4.**s with their manuals. i think thats with the t-56 though
. i heard 4:11's were quite streetable as well, but i do believe it was with a t-56. i remember zepher talking about it in a thread a while back. sure id love to get a t-56 but i doubt thats going to happen any time soon. right now my 5th gear popped off the shaft so its a bitch to drive on the highway since im always in 4th. the drone of driving above 3k really get to you, especially since i have no radio heh.anyway, can 4.xx's go in a 3 series carrier? im running 2.77's right now and i have horrible acceleration. too bad its a 2 series carrier

wow, i just used the RPM calculator to figure out how many rpms the engine wouldat when you're going 65mph with a 4.11 rear in 5th gear (.63:1)...only 2100rpm!! thats totally streetable....who is running anything higher that 4.11's?
Last edited by Trans_AM_88; Mar 7, 2004 at 10:04 PM.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by Kontrax
you see that? i am good for something on this site
you see that? i am good for something on this site
of course! so does 4.11's go in a 3 series carrier?edit: is it 4:10's or 4:11's that go in BW 10 bolt rears??
Last edited by Trans_AM_88; Mar 7, 2004 at 10:14 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
heh...ok 
i'm really just looking for some decently fast gears for a 5 speed...i dunno if it should be 3.73's or 4.1x's. where can i buy gears online? i'm having a tough time finding anything..

i'm really just looking for some decently fast gears for a 5 speed...i dunno if it should be 3.73's or 4.1x's. where can i buy gears online? i'm having a tough time finding anything..
Last edited by Trans_AM_88; Mar 7, 2004 at 10:23 PM.
Banned
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
http://www.ringpinion.com try that site. heard great things about the yukon gears. expensive stuff for the gears and rebuild kit though
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
I have the 3.42's cause I used to have a 700R4, but they work awsome with a T-5 nice acceleration and good all around gear. I spin like crazy even with these so I am glad I don't have 3.73 or deeper. The T-5 has a 2.95 first gear when combined with the 3.42's, is deeper than an old 2.20 muncie with a 4.11 rear. Plus, gook luck finding speedo gears for a 4.10 ratio rear end.
You could always do 3.55s, I think they came as stock gear in the vettes(someone correct me if im wrong). And theyre right, 4.10s work best with the T-56, has something to do with the final gear ratios in the tranny causeing it to get better gas mileage or something to that effect....but since you didnt say 3.55s, go 3.42s.
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Barstow, CA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Trans_AM_88
yeah, i have a t-5. i would like to stay somewhat streetable....
wow, i just used the RPM calculator to figure out how many rpms the engine wouldat when you're going 65mph with a 4.11 rear in 5th gear (.63:1)...only 2100rpm!! thats totally streetable....who is running anything higher that 4.11's?
yeah, i have a t-5. i would like to stay somewhat streetable....
wow, i just used the RPM calculator to figure out how many rpms the engine wouldat when you're going 65mph with a 4.11 rear in 5th gear (.63:1)...only 2100rpm!! thats totally streetable....who is running anything higher that 4.11's?
Oh and by the way, the New Jersey Devils Suck! It's all about the LA Kings!
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by johnjm22
Dude, are you sure about those calculations? If you want to stay streetable definatley go with 3.73 or 3.42. 4.11 would be a total pain in the *** on the freeway unless you have a t-56.
Oh and by the way, the New Jersey Devils Suck! It's all about the LA Kings!
Dude, are you sure about those calculations? If you want to stay streetable definatley go with 3.73 or 3.42. 4.11 would be a total pain in the *** on the freeway unless you have a t-56.
Oh and by the way, the New Jersey Devils Suck! It's all about the LA Kings!

anyway, these are numbers i used in the calculations:
rear end gear ratio: 4.11
Transmission Gear Ratio: .63 (5th gear)
MPH: 65
Tire Radius: 12.8
= 2208.9965625 RPM
no?
Last edited by Trans_AM_88; Mar 8, 2004 at 09:23 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by Kontrax
http://www.ringpinion.com try that site. heard great things about the yukon gears. expensive stuff for the gears and rebuild kit though
http://www.ringpinion.com try that site. heard great things about the yukon gears. expensive stuff for the gears and rebuild kit though
what rear ends do we have...7.5's...7.65's? i have a 10 bolt BW from my '88 GTA.
also, can i buy 3.73's for a 2 series carrier? i think i have 2.77's...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
what are you on ? 14" rims or are those REALLY low profile tires?
also, i have the 3.08 2-series carrier and summit sells 3.73's for 2-series, i believe they sell 4.10's as well.. but that might have been another website i saw that at,
also, i have the 3.08 2-series carrier and summit sells 3.73's for 2-series, i believe they sell 4.10's as well.. but that might have been another website i saw that at,
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by TraviZ
what are you on ? 14" rims or are those REALLY low profile tires?
also, i have the 3.08 2-series carrier and summit sells 3.73's for 2-series, i believe they sell 4.10's as well.. but that might have been another website i saw that at,
what are you on ? 14" rims or are those REALLY low profile tires?
also, i have the 3.08 2-series carrier and summit sells 3.73's for 2-series, i believe they sell 4.10's as well.. but that might have been another website i saw that at,
my tires are 245/50/16
to get the height of a sidewall (profile):
50% of 245mm = 122.5mm
122.5mm= 4.82 inches
4.82" is the height of one sidewall.
to get the radius of the entire wheel:
4.82" + 8" (the radius of the rim) = 12.82"
12.82" = the radius of the entire wheel.
correct?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
You need to keep the full sidewall distance in your calculation, do not divide it by 2., so 245 is aprox 9.5 inches, and add that to half your rim which is 8, total is 17.5"
try that in your calculation, that should give you a real rpm range.
try that in your calculation, that should give you a real rpm range.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
25THRSS: yeah that's what i thought...
TraviZ: if i use both of the sidewalls, that wouldnt be the radius of the wheel...
heres some more calculations...maybe they make a little more sense.
2 sidewalls = 9.64"
9.64" + 16" rim = 25.64"
25.64" would be the entire wheels diameter.
half of that is 12.82", which should be the radius of the wheel.
TraviZ: if i use both of the sidewalls, that wouldnt be the radius of the wheel...
heres some more calculations...maybe they make a little more sense.
2 sidewalls = 9.64"
9.64" + 16" rim = 25.64"
25.64" would be the entire wheels diameter.
half of that is 12.82", which should be the radius of the wheel.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Well, if you got a carb, that takes away much of the top end limitation of the TPI engines.
Assuming the motor is good to around 6000 or so, I'd say 3.73 for auto, and 3.73 or 4.10 for a manual
Assuming the motor is good to around 6000 or so, I'd say 3.73 for auto, and 3.73 or 4.10 for a manual
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Tennessee
Car: '91 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T5
according to http://www.dodgecharger.net/tech/RPM...alculator.html
you are correct.. your overall diameter is 25.65 and at 65 mph you will be running 65 at 2000 with 3.73 and 59 at 2000 with 4.11
if i was you, id go with the 4.10 or 4.11 gear
you are correct.. your overall diameter is 25.65 and at 65 mph you will be running 65 at 2000 with 3.73 and 59 at 2000 with 4.11
if i was you, id go with the 4.10 or 4.11 gear
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by flowmasterchevy
according to http://www.dodgecharger.net/tech/RPM...alculator.html
you are correct.. your overall diameter is 25.65 and at 65 mph you will be running 65 at 2000 with 3.73 and 59 at 2000 with 4.11
if i was you, id go with the 4.10 or 4.11 gear
according to http://www.dodgecharger.net/tech/RPM...alculator.html
you are correct.. your overall diameter is 25.65 and at 65 mph you will be running 65 at 2000 with 3.73 and 59 at 2000 with 4.11
if i was you, id go with the 4.10 or 4.11 gear
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Grove, Wisconsin
Car: 91' Firebird Formula WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
i'm looking to change the gearing in my car too. i am setup with 2.73's in my 91' formula. i am thinking i want to go to the 3.42 because i have heard that you run out of gearing quicker with the 3.73 and i want something left for the highway. also i have heard traction problems comming off the line with the 3.73 or anything geared much higher. i am running the TH700R4
Thanks
Thanks
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by Trans_AM_88
ahhhh i dunno. are 4.1x's a pain in the ***? how are they for driving around town
ahhhh i dunno. are 4.1x's a pain in the ***? how are they for driving around town
also: on another subject...can one determine the rear end gear ratio by counting the teeth on the speedo gear?
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Car: 88 sc. convert
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: Formerly 700-Now T5
It's kind of funny you guys are talking about -speeds handling 3.73 and 4.11 better than auto's. I'm going from .70 to .72 in top gear by going to an 84 5 sp, from a 88 700. Ooops. I didn't really look into that before I bought the parts car. I think I'm going to run 3.43 posi. My 2.73 just doesn't cut it. I'm also going to run 17" wheels though, so I have to be careful. I may need 3.73's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Dec 11, 2023 08:14 AM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM





