Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

What cars came with MK6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2004 | 11:40 PM
  #1  
Mark_ZZ3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 71
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
What cars came with MK6?

Is there any rule or common experience for which cars got the MK6?

From what I can tell, if you ordered a Formula or GTA with a 305 5 speed, then you got the better MK6 tranny and the 3.45 or 3.42 rear end.

If you had a Trans Am with a 305 5speed, then you got the regular 5 speed and the 3.08 rear gears.

Just curious if anyone has more info.

Mark.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #2  
vernw's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX area
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"
My 91 Formula with the high output (dual cats) TPI 305 came with the MK6 and 3.42 limited slip if that helps any.....
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #3  
DJP87Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
When you wanted certain options and bought the car new it was special ordered with those RPO from the Factory. Not like today,you have to take what on th new car dealers lot and the salesman will say" whats a special order ??". So it depended on how smart of a performance guy the orginal owner was to get the items you quoted by special ordering them.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
91formulaSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA
Car: 91 Formula, 95 GT
Engine: 5.7, 5.0
Transmission: T5, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1, ???
What is MK6? And why is it better?
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #5  
Mark_ZZ3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 71
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
I agree on the special order thing.

I am just finding that you could not order a G92 on a 1987 Trans Am. The G92 appears to give you the better gear ratio and the tranny with the lower overdrive.

Now a GTA or Formula you automatically got the G92 without having to specifiy it.

1987 was a strange year. I think you could have ordered some odd combination with the right dealership.

Mark.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
vernw's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX area
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"
MK6 is the world class 5 speed, which is a little stronger than the non-world class version.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
All T-5 Camaros and Firebirds had the 2nd design trans from 88 up. The different design of trans is not any kind of RPO code. Strictly date-related.

MK6 has to be something else. Perhaps the better 5th gear; .73 instead of .63.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #8  
vernw's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX area
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"
Don't think so, but I could be wrong....

I still think that's the 5 speed tranny identifier.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #9  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Could be that; but it can't possibly be a RPO code for a 2nd design trans, with some other RPO code for 1st design. Which design you got wasn't a RPO issue.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #10  
Mark_ZZ3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 71
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
Typically (in 87 and 88) when you got a 5 speed, you got option code "MM5". In order to get the lower 5th overdrive, you had to have a second option code, the MK6 as I recall.

My question was ... what triggered the MK6? It seems that the cars with G92 received the MK6.

At some point, GM may have gone to just one V8 tranny instead of the two.

Mark.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #11  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I don't know that. My 83 car came with the better overdrive, as did every L69 or G92 T-5 I've had; but the lesser cars had the .63. Mostly the LG4 and RS cars were the ones that got the gas-mileage OD gear, that was so low that some of them wouldn't go up hills in 5th, especially with the 2.73 rear gears.

It was amazing some of the things GM did to these cars to deal with the unrealistic CAFE requirements in those days. Between that and emissions, the majority of them really got the short end of every stick there was. You had to try REAL HARD to get a car that wasn't nutted.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #12  
91formulaSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA
Car: 91 Formula, 95 GT
Engine: 5.7, 5.0
Transmission: T5, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1, ???
Originally posted by RB83L69
You had to try REAL HARD to get a car that wasn't nutted.
Don't you mean de-nutted.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #13  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Well yeah.... nuts removed. What they call "nutted" in the livestock business. I don't think it's possible to re-nut an animal once he's been nutted.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #14  
David M's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by RB83L69
I don't know that. My 83 car came with the better overdrive, as did every L69 or G92 T-5 I've had; but the lesser cars had the .63. Mostly the LG4 and RS cars were the ones that got the gas-mileage OD gear, that was so low that some of them wouldn't go up hills in 5th, especially with the 2.73 rear gears.

The LG4 and RS cars got the transmission designated M39. I've always wondered what the difference between the MK6 & M39
is.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #15  
Mark_ZZ3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 71
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
MK6 means the lower (better) overdrive.

Mark.
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #16  
vernw's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX area
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"
Can you define "better"? Which ratio is the MK6, the .73 or the .63?
Reply
Old May 17, 2004 | 09:42 PM
  #17  
f-crazy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
MK6 : TRANSMISSION, MAN 5 SPD, B0RG WARNER, 2.95 1ST, O/D
MM5 : MERCHANDISED TRANS, MAN 5 SPD PROVISIONS
G92 : AXLE REAR RATIO, PERFORMANCE
M39 : TRANSMISSION, MAN 5 SPD B0RG WARNER, 77MM, 2.95

The "better" overdrive was the .73...which came in ALL the 5 spd 1LE cars...MK6 was on the Rpo sheet in order to make the .73 gear to be legal in showroom stock racing....only the 1LE 5 spds got the .73..

A little info on why there are 2 different..adding to what RB said, even with the 3.42's, the 5 speed cars would get walked in 5th gear long straitaways by those LX notch's, so gm added the .73 to better suit the TPI's torque curve..not only did it work it was common to see cam/birds passing coming out of a corner and pulling them down the straits....


With G92 you get the MK6 RPO but you had to have 1LE to get the MK6 .73 gear.....
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #18  
Mark_ZZ3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 71
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
Originally posted by f-crazy

The "better" overdrive was the .73...which came in ALL the 5 spd 1LE cars...MK6 was on the Rpo sheet in order to make the .73 gear to be legal in showroom stock racing....only the 1LE 5 spds got the .73..

With G92 you get the MK6 RPO but you had to have 1LE to get the MK6 .73 gear.....
Prior to the 1LE cars, the Players Challenge Cars in 1987 and 1988 also go the MK6 tranny. I'm sure some were also build for the US based firehawk series too.

Mark.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 06:02 AM
  #19  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I don't know anything about getting "walked" by Mustangs; as I described, my 83 car, from the days when the best Mustang you could get was about a half-second slower, came with it. I doubt that anything to do with Mustangs had anything to do with it.

I know it had it because it was in there the first time I tore it up and had to rebuild it, in 86. About the same time I obtained a lunched T-5 (mainshaft snapped off right in front of the splines) for parts, out of a 84 L69 car; also with the .73.

I'd suspect it was the other way around..... that is, the .73 is the "right" ratio, most suitable for actually moving the car most effectively; but for CAFE they used this other ratio in as many cars as they possibly could, that produced higher gas mileage numbers on the tests regardless of whether it actually worked well in the real world or not, and forced you to go out of your way to special-order the more suitable ratio which lowered the results on the test and hurt the product line's CAFE.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #20  
2.73's Suck's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
Originally posted by RB83L69
Well yeah.... nuts removed. What they call "nutted" in the livestock business. I don't think it's possible to re-nut an animal once he's been nutted.
hahaha, nice. I have an 86 tranny in my car and I turn 1750 rpms at 70mph with 2.73's, that would be .63 right? 2 things 2.73's dont suck for, 30 mpg or 90mph in third gear, heh.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 10:49 AM
  #21  
f-crazy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
i copied this directly from www.1Le.org

http://www.1le.org/1le's.htm

This was not enough to motivate the heavy Camaro's past the lighter Mustangs, and passing was impossible in the high speed straights. The lack of Fifth-gear torque was a direct result of GM trying to improve fuel economy and emissions for the everyday car buyer. Originally, GM equipped all five-speed manual F-car transmissions with a 0.62:1 overdrive Fifth gear. This gear was too tall and the Camaros couldn't even get out of a Mustang's way on the long straights. A steeper 0.74 gear ratio was slipped quietly into all five-speed transmissions slated for installation into the 1LE Camaro's. The gear swap was combined with an aluminum driveshaft to lighten the car and decrease the drivetrain's rotating mass saving power. This all became a factory-installed option, thereby meeting the rules and keeping costs down as well.


i dont know anything about those pre TPI cars, and i wont pretend that i do nor will i argue about the fact that your 83 had the better 5th gear, but as i said the .74 5th gear (IN TPI CARS) came from being WALKED by mustang down long straits....
if you didnt have 1LE then you DONT HAVE the .74.....
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #22  
Mark_ZZ3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 71
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
Originally posted by f-crazy
i copied this directly from www.1Le.org

if you didnt have 1LE then you DONT HAVE the .74.....
GM did many things back then. While it is true the 1LE cars came with the .74 gear, so did many other cars.

All Player's challenge cars from 1987-up came with the 0.74 5th gear except for 11 or so of the first 1987 Camaros. All other had them from the factory. This was part of the A4U option package of the time. As these cars were built exclusively for the showroom stock racing, all the parts had to be GM, although there wasn't any rules that they had to be production.

In 1986, the cars came with 3.73 or 3.70 rear gears, so the 0.6x overdrive was more useable. In 1987, the gears dropped to 3.45, which created some problems.

The 1LE group of options was ultimately born out of the Players Challenge racing series and the firehawk series in the US. There were many early version of these options that are not well documented. You can discuss 1LE for many hours on what was and wasn't included. Bottom line ... GM did many things each year. Suffice to say ... if you have a 1LE, you got the good stuff. If you don't have 1LE ... you might. My 1988 Trans Am, which is not a 1LE car, came factory equipped with the 1LE front brakes ... one of the first cars to leave the assembly line. I have documentation and I have spoken directly with GM and the people that installed them. The only reason 1LE came out in 1988 was to make the heavy duty brakes "production" and thus make the cars legal to race in certain races. Chances are all of the 1988 1LE production was very late in the year ... well after all the race cars proved them to be a "production ready" option.

Mark.

Last edited by Mark_ZZ3; May 19, 2004 at 11:24 AM.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #23  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
L69 cars got the good gears (.73) as well as, appearantly, the 1LE cars.

MK6, IIRC, was the RPO for the actual trans itself, and MM5 was the RPO for all the other stuff the manual trans required.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #24  
Petes 84Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 3
From: out of my mind; be back in 5 minutes....
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Completed
Axle/Gears: ones that turn.
My 84 Z28 has MK6 and MM5 on it's SPID sticker, and was powered by the mighty LG4. It had the .73 OD and the GU5 3.23 rear.
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 06:12 AM
  #25  
novass's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 1
From: Grand Island, NY
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Here:
Attached Thumbnails What cars came with MK6?-gears.jpg  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM
kyleb24
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 15, 2015 08:24 AM
bryan623
Auto Detailing and Appearance
2
Aug 10, 2015 11:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.