Fresh oil.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Fresh oil.
Just changed the oil in the tranny and 9 bolt. The T5 is now enjoying a fresh fill of Synchromax and the 9 bolt is full
of Redline 75W110. T5 shifts smooth.
of Redline 75W110. T5 shifts smooth.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Senior Member




Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 758
Likes: 249
From: Hilton Head Island, SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 liter V-8
Transmission: 4 speed auto
Re: Fresh oil.
Question about this:
I bought a stock TA in February of 2018. It was well maintained, in great shape, one owner. It had 32,000 miles on it and I've put added about 3,000 miles on it now. The car runs just great.
I don't have maintenance records regarding the fluids. I've changed the oil of course and I had the brakes flushed and filled.
No idea when the rear differential fluid or transmission fluid (automatic) has been changed, if ever. Years ago I used to read warnings about older cars regarding automatic transmissions, basically saying that if you haven't changed it and the car is of a certain age, you're better off leaving it alone. I think the reasoning was that the new fluid might break down the old seals.
I tend to think that I should probably change the tranny fluid. Any thoughts? I know this is quite an old debate and I've read arguments over the years on both sides. Some people say that is absolutely a myth that new transmission fluid caused later problems and that in such cases, the transmission was on its last legs anyway.
I bought a stock TA in February of 2018. It was well maintained, in great shape, one owner. It had 32,000 miles on it and I've put added about 3,000 miles on it now. The car runs just great.
I don't have maintenance records regarding the fluids. I've changed the oil of course and I had the brakes flushed and filled.
No idea when the rear differential fluid or transmission fluid (automatic) has been changed, if ever. Years ago I used to read warnings about older cars regarding automatic transmissions, basically saying that if you haven't changed it and the car is of a certain age, you're better off leaving it alone. I think the reasoning was that the new fluid might break down the old seals.
I tend to think that I should probably change the tranny fluid. Any thoughts? I know this is quite an old debate and I've read arguments over the years on both sides. Some people say that is absolutely a myth that new transmission fluid caused later problems and that in such cases, the transmission was on its last legs anyway.
Last edited by ksr; Apr 26, 2019 at 03:28 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Re: Fresh oil.
Question about this:
I bought a stock TA in February of 2018. It was well maintained, in great shape, one owner. It had 32,000 miles on it and I've put added about 3,000 miles on it now. The car runs just great.
I don't have maintenance records regarding the fluids. I've changed the oil of course and I had the brakes flushed and filled.
No idea when the rear differential fluid or transmission fluid (automatic) has been changed, if ever. Years ago I used to read warnings about older cars regarding automatic transmissions, basically saying that if you haven't changed it and the car is of a certain age, you're better off leaving it alone. I think the reasoning was that the new fluid might break down the old seals.
I tend to think that I should probably change the tranny fluid. Any thoughts? I know this is quite an old debate and I've read arguments over the years on both sides. Some people say that is absolutely a myth that new transmission fluid caused later problems and that in such cases, the transmission was on its last legs anyway.
I bought a stock TA in February of 2018. It was well maintained, in great shape, one owner. It had 32,000 miles on it and I've put added about 3,000 miles on it now. The car runs just great.
I don't have maintenance records regarding the fluids. I've changed the oil of course and I had the brakes flushed and filled.
No idea when the rear differential fluid or transmission fluid (automatic) has been changed, if ever. Years ago I used to read warnings about older cars regarding automatic transmissions, basically saying that if you haven't changed it and the car is of a certain age, you're better off leaving it alone. I think the reasoning was that the new fluid might break down the old seals.
I tend to think that I should probably change the tranny fluid. Any thoughts? I know this is quite an old debate and I've read arguments over the years on both sides. Some people say that is absolutely a myth that new transmission fluid caused later problems and that in such cases, the transmission was on its last legs anyway.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CamarosRUS
Tech / General Engine
9
Jan 5, 2007 10:39 AM




