what do you all think.......
what do you all think.......
what do you guy's think about this???????
or have any of you ever tried this?????
www.turbonator.com
or have any of you ever tried this?????
www.turbonator.com
Last edited by confucius101; Sep 6, 2002 at 03:26 PM.
Those types of devices are supposed to create a vortex effect in the incoming air charge. This is supposed to create a swirl effect which promotes more efficient combustion. Your heads and valves have far more say in that than an helical piece of metal does. IMO, this goes against the common wisdom of maintaining a smooth airflow into the intake manifold (the concept behind throttle body-mounted airfoils like the one TPIS sells.)
Its a gimmick, save your money. Unless the air is forced(Pressurized by a turbo or supercharger) into the cylinder, the cylinder will only draw in the same amount of air unless it is restricted. This device does nothing to help unrestrict the air flow and if anything (Like Rag stated) it can possibly disrupt air flow. If it does help, it would be only in the most minuit way, certainly not worth $70 bucks.
Originally posted by AFrikanGoodTime
Its a gimmick, save your money. Unless the air is forced(Pressurized by a turbo or supercharger) into the cylinder, the cylinder will only draw in the same amount of air unless it is restricted. This device does nothing to help unrestrict the air flow and if anything (Like Rag stated) it can possibly disrupt air flow. If it does help, it would be only in the most minuit way, certainly not worth $70 bucks.
Its a gimmick, save your money. Unless the air is forced(Pressurized by a turbo or supercharger) into the cylinder, the cylinder will only draw in the same amount of air unless it is restricted. This device does nothing to help unrestrict the air flow and if anything (Like Rag stated) it can possibly disrupt air flow. If it does help, it would be only in the most minuit way, certainly not worth $70 bucks.
"Have I ever seen this used on a race car?" The answer 99 of 100 times is NO.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
"Have I ever seen this used on a race car?" The answer 99 of 100 times is NO.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Hey, don't diss the K&N now!
Granted, you're not gonna make nowhere near 20 horses like the commercials say..that's total BS...but it is a damn good filter! Flows WAY more than we need... But I hear ya about the octane booster..I've been fooled by that more than I'd like to admit. Anyone ever buy the NOS brand booster?
Granted, you're not gonna make nowhere near 20 horses like the commercials say..that's total BS...but it is a damn good filter! Flows WAY more than we need... But I hear ya about the octane booster..I've been fooled by that more than I'd like to admit. Anyone ever buy the NOS brand booster?
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
LOL your not going to make any HP form K&N that you could ever use. And they don't help gas mileage either.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Ryan_Alswede
LOL your not going to make any HP form K&N that you could ever use. And they don't help gas mileage either.
LOL your not going to make any HP form K&N that you could ever use. And they don't help gas mileage either.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
Well on my 1992 they use a different set-up where the air comes in by the right side fender thru a round cylinder air filter housing and filter. Not restrictive at all, all the duct work and main opening are larger then the butterfly's diameter so no way.
Have you actually seen the size of the opening on that cylinder? Even AFTER I took the little plastic horn off (which had an opening only an inch and a half wide), the new opening was only about two inches.
That little tiny "Filter in a Can" is a huge restriction. Ask anyone who's made or bought a CAI for the 3.1 There's a huge difference even if that's your only mod and after an exhaust upgrade, it's an even bigger difference.
David
David
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
After I swapped for a K&N, I screwed the MAT sensor out of the can, tossed it, and laid the filter down flat against the part where the can rested, and ran the sensor up inside..just had to tape off a few holes..and then put the lid on the filter itself and hooked it up..made a nice difference, pulling air from all sides. That little horn is crap.
BTW, sure it's around the same size as the butterfly...but still we want to make as much air available as possible, so the more opening for air flow the better...plus it should get a better pull when you step on the gas, it can get more air quicker
BTW, sure it's around the same size as the butterfly...but still we want to make as much air available as possible, so the more opening for air flow the better...plus it should get a better pull when you step on the gas, it can get more air quicker
Last edited by Nixon1; Sep 7, 2002 at 10:24 PM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
LOL you guys are fooling yourselfs you are getting no benefit, and using tape and butchering stuff and removing stuff is just sad and shows the lack of science education.
I don't need to ask anybody that, LOL, I know from the rules of physics that your butchering is getting you no benefit. And the proof is the DYNO! Zipo! Just makes your car look choped up and trashed under the hood for nothing.
Now your pulling in air from the hot side of the radiator.
The horn is there just to add a deeper sound, has no effect on performence. Ram air system like on SS camaros where it pulls the air in from the front of the radiator are nice and like a Viper system right through the hood. But remember those are BIG engines that produce HP. Our 6ers don't benifit.
Ask anyone who's made or bought a CAI for the 3.1
pulling air from all sides
The horn is there just to add a deeper sound, has no effect on performence. Ram air system like on SS camaros where it pulls the air in from the front of the radiator are nice and like a Viper system right through the hood. But remember those are BIG engines that produce HP. Our 6ers don't benifit.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
I see what you're saying and I'd tend to agree with the numbers...but I can feel a difference, and if you ask a lot of people on here, I think they'd be inclined to agree, despite the #'s and science behind it. Now I DO agree that my current setup isnt helping me any because, even thought the filter pickup is a conical in front of the radiator and gets air going through the grille, it's running through crap ducting with too many bends...nullifies any benefits. Plus Dynos cancel out any kind of ram air effect on the street.
btw-my current setup is NOT the can-less one I talked about, but I think I made that kinda obvious.
btw-my current setup is NOT the can-less one I talked about, but I think I made that kinda obvious.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
Well put a HUGE fan in front of your car, you still won't see any change. The #'s don't lie.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
It's too late for me, I'm not even gonna try to argue this. All I can say is, I feel a difference. And I know the difference between THINKING I feel a difference and actually feeling one.. Psychological is like..high test gas...octane booster..new oil..
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
I agree with you Nixon1 on the new oil feeling but at least there is science behind that one. But I do love the feeling, wish I had a 8 gal tank like the nascar boys so the new oil feeling would last longer. LOL
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Ha...yeah, I hear ya. I wish I lived up north so I could run 24/7 on that cold dense air!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




