V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.
View Poll Results: Would you buy a turbo kit?
Maybe... if you had proof of it's performance.
9
39.13%
Heck yeah! Sign me up now, baby!
2
8.70%
No way. You can't get any power out of a V6, anyway.
3
13.04%
Yes, I'd be interested, if it were under $3k.
9
39.13%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Interested in a turbo kit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #1  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Interested in a turbo kit?

With my own research and all going on, I'm curious as to ACTUAL interest in a 60º V6 turbo kit, for our 3rd gen vehicles.

It would include -

Custom PROM
New 16G Turbo
New 19pph injectors
All piping/manifolds (I could do it with custom manifolds, or use my current piping method)
BOV
Intercooled or non intercooled.

Run 6-8 psi boost. It'd be compatible with all 60º blocks, clearanced for 3rd gens.

I figure anywhere from $2k to $4k for the complete kit, with instructions (of course, lol)

What kind of interest is there actually out there for something like this? I'd (obviously) have full dyno runs and all. Figure it'd bolt on somewhere between 80-120hp.

Perhaps do customs too, with lower cr forged pistons. I'd sell forged pistons/rods as well. Is there any real market for a powerful V6?

Also, what would you guys be willing to spend on the kit? I could do it boneyard cheap, with rebuilt turbos (like $1500) or with new turbos ($2k+) or with custom manifolds as well ($3k)

Last edited by Doward; Jun 19, 2003 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #2  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I see I'm getting some votes... but no feedback...

Let me ask this -

What would you expect from a custom built turbo kit?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
F585's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Paradise, CA
Under 3k hell yea!:hail:
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 10:44 PM
  #4  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
No- because the 2.8/3.1 RWD block and heads can't handle it- thats why no company has ever made one- it would not last. There is one made for the 3.4 block and heads('93-95 Camaros) because they are much stronger.

Edit: if I thought highly of the 2.8/3.1 motor, then my name would be AGreat2.8

Last edited by AGood2.8; Jun 19, 2003 at 10:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 10:48 PM
  #5  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
*shrugs* I'm of the mindset that no one's done it, hence no one knows.

The only turbo 2.8 I know is pushing like 500+ hp. The block can handle it. The rods? I can get forged rods. Pistons? Same there. Honestly, a 3.1 (or 2.8 stroker to 3.1) with 8.5:1 cr would simply fly, in my opinion, with 10-14 psi boost.

At least, I think it will. So I'm going to build one, and see. From what I've seen from my poll, is that IF the power is there, then people will be interested...
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 10:31 AM
  #6  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
TTT
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
Jurrel's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, California
Car: 1984 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Carburated
Transmission: T5 Manual
Can't take it? Then why are there at least 2 turbo kits for the 2.8L V6 on Fieros?

Sorry forgot to add the car I was talking bout
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 07:59 PM
  #8  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Jurrel
Can't take it? Then why are there at least 2 turbo kits for the 2.8L V6 on Fieros?

Sorry forgot to add the car I was talking bout
Nobody leaves the 2.8's in the Fieros- why? they go Kaboom- Everyone changes them to the Northstar motors for real power and reliabilty.

I'm not here to argue, just to inform- You don't have to agree with my opinion, heck, I should just maybe keep my mouth shut and let you guys wate your money fitting a turbo onto it and finding out $$$$ later that it was a big mistake. The stock RWD 2.8's have had a long reputation as being "2.crap" The bottom ends are weak and suffer friom extensive endplay if abused-

Don't trust my opinion- ask a professional who owns a repair shop that has specialized in F-bodies for years- He's on these boards. his name is DynoDon- Don litterally has his own scrapyard of broken 2.8 & 3.1 motors.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 12:58 PM
  #9  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
If the 2.8/3.1 can handle a 75 shot of nitrous stock, I'd think it could handle 6-8psi stock, as well. As long as the fuel delivery problems were dealt with.

Also a quick bump, still wondering if there is actually any demand for a turbo kit for our cars....

AM91, if you read this, would you be willing to help me do a kit for the MAP based cars? (730 ecu)
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 01:38 PM
  #10  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Doward
Honestly, a 3.1 (or 2.8 stroker to 3.1) with 8.5:1 cr would simply fly, in my opinion, with 10-14 psi boost.

You damn well better intercool that boost unless you want to drive over your crank
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 02:18 PM
  #11  
Y2KFirehawk's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Car: 00 T/A Firehawk
Engine: 346ci LS1
Transmission: MN6
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
If it were under 3K, written like someone yourself who ACTUALLY installed it, and worked with MAP (I have a 3.1L) I'd be totally for it!!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 10:55 PM
  #12  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I'm working on getting a 'helper' to work on the electronical testing aspect of a 3.1 turbo....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Dec 11, 2023 08:14 AM
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
Mickeyruder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 2, 2015 02:45 PM
fasteddi
Power Adders
30
Sep 2, 2015 10:29 AM
crazynights
Transmissions and Drivetrain
10
Aug 21, 2015 06:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.