V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

300hp Supercharged 3.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #1  
Lee7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
300hp Supercharged 3.4L



http://www.rocketekmarine.com/specs.htm

Rocketek selected the General Motors 3.4 ltr 60 degree V6 engine for a variety of of reasons. Generating high horsepower from a small package requires a strong base engine and superior components to assure reliability. The race heritage of this engine combined with its use in current and future automotive applications proves the reliability over a wide range of applications. The utilization of this engine and our innovative design makes this package the highest horsepower to weight ratio in the Marine industry.
w00t for 60degree power!

Last edited by Lee7; Jul 19, 2003 at 05:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
To bad it has them works "marine application".

Them exhaust manifold/headers look freakin sweet!!!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #3  
Lee7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by Dale
To bad it has them works "marine application".

Them exhaust manifold/headers look freakin sweet!!!
marine engines are not a whole lot different from normal car engines, it would not take much to put a marine engine in a car...
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 10:44 PM
  #4  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
A Marine engine generally differs in the cooling set up. And cam, that's about it.
I SAY await what GM reissues in the new 60* engine family. 2005 Caddy STS!
It may be (Supercharged version) here sooner than ya think!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 01:00 AM
  #5  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Someone good should start talking to them guys and see what parts or things they are doing that coud be brought over to us.

Matt
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 01:46 AM
  #6  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
the things bad ***


Marine engines draw in fresh water and spit it right back out once it goes thru the motor.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 04:19 AM
  #7  
F585's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Paradise, CA
Headers look like shark fins
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 10:49 AM
  #8  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Looking close anD it looks like them headers are water cooled / part of the cooling system. Them headers would be helpful in a turbo setup maybe, if they can be fliped around backwards.

Matt
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 12:53 PM
  #9  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
yea they are part of the cooling system it looks like.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 06:43 PM
  #10  
devianb's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Lol, sometimes I forget just how small the 2.8l is without all its accessories and smog equipment.


Thats a pretty interesting 60 degree.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 08:04 PM
  #11  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
heres a 2.8 theyt claim will do 85 in second gear

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=2424029489
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 11:13 PM
  #12  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Cold Dark Shado
heres a 2.8 theyt claim will do 85 in second gear

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=2424029489
The guy's an idiot- any motor will do 85mph in 2 gear if the gear box and rear patio is geared right- only problem is- its 0-85mph in fifteen minutes


--------------------

As for marine engine cooling- the water inlet is first pumped through the exhaust manifolds to warm a bit before entering the block- this way too cool of water will not crack the block.

The 175HP version is the same exact HT3.4 160HP motpr from GM. The 160HP rating is in a stock S10 with stock exahaust manifolds and belt assesories attached. All they run on it in the boat is an alternator. Take off your pulley belts some time and you all will see how much faster your car will feel. There is net HP and gross HP ratings on all engines.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 12:23 AM
  #13  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
think he may be reffering to a stock 5 speed tranny but i know what your sayin
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 02:08 AM
  #14  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
With 3.42s and a T5 and full redline shift will see 85 in 2nd.
Not the best way to get to 85, but you will and can. You could get 90 if you over rev.

Matt
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 09:35 AM
  #15  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Gumby
With 3.42s and a T5 and full redline shift will see 85 in 2nd.
Not the best way to get to 85, but you will and can. You could get 90 if you over rev.

Matt
I don't think so partner.

Do you realise the motor would have to tack 7200 rpm's with a 26" tall rear tire?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #16  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
Originally posted by AGood2.8
I don't think so partner.

Do you realise the motor would have to tack 7200 rpm's with a 26" tall rear tire?
ummm no
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #17  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Cold Dark Shado
ummm no
UM Yes!

rearend ratio- 3.42
Trans gear ratio (second gear in a T5)- 1.94
MPH- 85
tire radius-13"

Calculates out to= 7288rpm
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #18  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
tire radius-13"


why is the tire radius 13"?

most are larger then that, thats a small tire
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #19  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Cold Dark Shado
tire radius-13"


why is the tire radius 13"?

most are larger then that, thats a small tire
Radius is half the diameter
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2003 | 12:27 AM
  #20  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
WHen my tranny on my camaro would not shift into 3rd or 4th i only had 1st and second gear. I figured since my tranny was screwed i would see how fast i could go in second gear i was able to do 90 and that was pushing redline.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2003 | 12:41 AM
  #21  
Cold Dark Shado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown
it can be done without 26" tires
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #22  
Xophertony's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
i can do 40MPH in second on my car, but thats okay cause if i want to go faster i still have three more forward gears
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 10:44 PM
  #23  
mike1986fyrbird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 357ci Stealth Ram - Under Pressure
Transmission: Built 700r4/Pro Yank 3400 Extreme
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.27
my old 1986 bird with a 4 speed auto would redline at 85mph in second gear.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
15
Nov 10, 2015 06:17 AM
Zeek1041
Theoretical and Street Racing
12
Sep 30, 2015 11:00 AM
-=Z28=-
Power Adders
2
Sep 24, 2015 10:21 AM
anesthes
Power Adders
0
Aug 24, 2015 08:32 AM
PestilenceIV
North East Region
3
Aug 20, 2015 03:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.