V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Under-hood insulation--what for?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #1  
CamaroManBlack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: New York State
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6 2BBL (yeah I know...)
Transmission: 700R4 automatic
Under-hood insulation--what for?

Why do manufacturers put that heavy black insulation on the undersides of hoods? Is it to protect the paint on the hood from heat, or to help insulate the engine bay for the sake of the engine warming up? I ask because I have a new hood for my car that still has the stuff on it, and I want to know if it's important before I go ripping it off and throwing it away. If anyone knows why the stuff is there, let me know.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #2  
br()bert's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Its sound deading material. Some noodles will tell you your paint will burn if you remove it. If your hood gets hot enough to burn the paint on the hood then you have some serious issues and half your motor is probably melting.

Tearing that ugly crap off my hood was the second thing i did when i bought my car. Every car i have had except one i removed the crap.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #3  
TA's Avatar
TA
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Carson, CA
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt
br()bert is 100 percent right on all counts. It is only for sound insullation, and serves no other purpose than collecting dirt.

Troy
So Cal
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #4  
CamaroManBlack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: New York State
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6 2BBL (yeah I know...)
Transmission: 700R4 automatic
ahhhhh that's good news!!! I was hoping to hear something like that; I've been itching to pull that crap down and throw it out. It always ends up sagging and it's heavy (thinking about my new lift supports' lives there). Thanks for clearing that up for me, guys.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #5  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Its a fire hazard that is meant for the garbage.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #6  
pvt num 11's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
It's not very heavy - unless you engine's been slinging oil and whatnot into it, it should be pretty light. It's not like you'll gain two-tenths on the quarter. Mine looked nasty, and the wife's car had it, but it looked pretty good in hers. Now the hood slams with a hollow metal sound, not a dull thud. And I didn't notice a big sound change either.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:45 PM
  #7  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by Gumby
Its a fire hazard that is meant for the garbage.
If any answer could be more incorrect, I'd be happy to hear it... the stuff is non-flammable and can smother an engine fire in an emergency, hence the cheap plastic clips holding it up...

Also, it does serve as a heat insulate.. most cars don't need this, but I can assure you the paint on my hood directly above my turbo isn't smiling. Exhaust manifolds can do a similar job idling for a decent period of time with no underhood ventilation and no insulation.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #8  
br()bert's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
thats complete

I know people wiith much, much larger engines that run ALOT of underhood heat in cars MUCH older than mine(455 olds omega,454's in novas etc) who have had no insulation on the hood and the paint on the hood is fine. The stiff was put their as a sound deading material thats it to reduce engine noise. Its held in place with plastic clips yes, how else would you hold it in place? Weld it? If you have messed up paint on your hood its from something else. maybe the age of the car? Its not from no material on the underside of the hood.


Although you are right about the fire hazard thing,. the stuff isnt flamable, at least mine wasnt.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #9  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Ehh.. the turbo is a special case for heat, trust me.. might not be as bad if I had a heat shield, but the underhood insulation would be doing its job. As I said, though, MOST cars don't need this. Another note, I mentioned a lack of underhood ventilation.. last I checked 454 novas usually have engine driven fans... there's going to be no lack of ventilation there.

Last edited by TechSmurf; Apr 22, 2004 at 07:01 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 07:23 PM
  #10  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by TechSmurf
If any answer could be more incorrect, I'd be happy to hear it... the stuff is non-flammable and can smother an engine fire in an emergency, hence the cheap plastic clips holding it up...
It may not burn but I have seen them burn. When they are old and dirty they will burn just fine. Trust me. Find one that leaves black soot on you when you touch it, light her up with a torch, simulating a carb fire.

It will burn. I know its not flammable, but the soot n garbage it soaks up will make it so. It should be replaced about every 5 years. at about 10 they are flammable. 15-20+ and its a torch.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #11  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Them things are just nasty too. work on your car in the heat n rub your back on one once. There are just nasty nasty things. When they are nice and new, they are nice.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #12  
CamaroManBlack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: New York State
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6 2BBL (yeah I know...)
Transmission: 700R4 automatic
I'm going to rip the stuff down; it doesn't sound like removing it is going to jeopardize the new coat of paint when it goes on. Thanks for all of the input, guys.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 03:24 AM
  #13  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Hmm... yeah.. they do kinda soak up flammable debris rather well.. hadn't factored that in.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I agree w/TechSmurf on the first bit- that it was meant to smother a fire. The plastic clips melt first, and then the insulation would drop down over the engine and hopefully put anything out.

But as far as paint burning, well, when I had my car painted back in 97, I didn't put the hood insulation back. The paint was fine for years- until I stopped washing/waxing the car. Now the hood paint looks just like the rest of the car- not worse, not better.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #15  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by TomP
I agree w/TechSmurf on the first bit- that it was meant to smother a fire.
I never thought of that.

But if I know Murphy's laws. It says by time the car is in bad enough shape to have an engine fire, the padding will have enough debree to fuel the fire. Not put it out.

They are nice when new.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #16  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
didn't smother my fire/over heating problem

likily the heater hose it burnt thru sprayed the flames.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #17  
camaro_junkie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I thought it was Project that had that huge fire and as I was scrolling down reading I was waiting to see a comment from him.

I wanna add my agreement to the consensus. Originally it would put out a fire, but after collecting crap it would probably burn after a few years. Also, whether it is for protecting the paint and dampening the sound or not, it couldn't hurt to help that a little.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #18  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
cool this thread makes me happy , im ripping mine off, how much heat can my lil 3.1 make anyways?, besides mine is also falling apart, looks like cotton ***** under my hood
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 03:53 AM
  #19  
Xophertony's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
the one on my stock hood is in great shape, but the new cowl induction hood i got does not have it. BUT my new hood has PLENTY of air flow . big scoop OH YEEAAAHHH!!!

on more point on the "protects paint" thing. if the paint was going to be affected, the paint on the underside of the hood would go first.
Reply
Old May 5, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #20  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Doesn't Dynamat make a special liner for underneath hoods? It's aluminized, and would look great if someone's engine were detailed. 'Course, it's like $70.. but...

And I think you can buy a new factory-style one from the repop places like The Paddock...

[edit] Huh... I thought Dynamat made one. Here's one by Thermotec: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...rt=THE%2D14001

Last edited by TomP; May 5, 2004 at 04:55 PM.
Reply
Old May 5, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #21  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
that looks like something trucks put on the side of there truck, the ones that sell food, anyone know what i mean
Reply
Old May 5, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #22  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
LOL! Those vending trucks are pretty damn shiny... yep, Dynamat does make it, here's a link: http://www.dynamat.com/auto_hoodliner.htm

Ah- here it is; I was using the wrong prefix. The Summit link is: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...57#largerimage
Reply
Old May 5, 2004 | 08:08 PM
  #23  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
i dont know but that looks ugly to me
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
okfoz
Convertibles
19
Nov 16, 2015 07:23 AM
Corellian Vette
Tech / General Engine
1
Jun 23, 2013 11:34 PM
richsteve
Tech / General Engine
8
Oct 13, 2012 08:14 PM
richsteve
Carburetors
4
Oct 11, 2012 09:06 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.