how beneficial is the egr sytem to our 2.8's?
how beneficial is the egr sytem to our 2.8's?
ok guys these headers im looking at did come off from a 2.8 camaro but they do not have the provisions for the egr system. how beneficial is it to our cars anyways. right now the vacumm lines going to my egr have been broken off but the car is still running great. everyonce in a while ti throws a code for it but it runs normal. if i get these headers could i just delete the egr system and the little pipe that goes to the exhaust manifold and the little flex pipe that goes to the intake?
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Re: how beneficial is the egr sytem to our 2.8's?
Originally posted by V6camaroman
ok guys these headers im looking at did come off from a 2.8 camaro but they do not have the provisions for the egr system. how beneficial is it to our cars anyways. right now the vacumm lines going to my egr have been broken off but the car is still running great. everyonce in a while ti throws a code for it but it runs normal. if i get these headers could i just delete the egr system and the little pipe that goes to the exhaust manifold and the little flex pipe that goes to the intake?
ok guys these headers im looking at did come off from a 2.8 camaro but they do not have the provisions for the egr system. how beneficial is it to our cars anyways. right now the vacumm lines going to my egr have been broken off but the car is still running great. everyonce in a while ti throws a code for it but it runs normal. if i get these headers could i just delete the egr system and the little pipe that goes to the exhaust manifold and the little flex pipe that goes to the intake?
Yes the system help emmisions, but it does a whole lot more.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: High plains of NM
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
It only works at part throttel it should be closed at idel (or you will lose vacc and stall) and wot.
It helps lean out and lower chamber temps when you cruse getting you more gas milage.
The bad thing it does is fill your intake and heads with carbon, it's the only big dirty draw back.
If you have a nice smoothly ported intake and heads like me, I say toss it.
It helps lean out and lower chamber temps when you cruse getting you more gas milage.
The bad thing it does is fill your intake and heads with carbon, it's the only big dirty draw back.
If you have a nice smoothly ported intake and heads like me, I say toss it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Re: Re: how beneficial is the egr sytem to our 2.8's?
Originally posted by V6sucker
The system increases HP, the system increases MPG and the system increases engine life by relieving the otherwise higher combustion temps. Lower temp, longer life.
Yes the system help emmisions, but it does a whole lot more.
The system increases HP, the system increases MPG and the system increases engine life by relieving the otherwise higher combustion temps. Lower temp, longer life.
Yes the system help emmisions, but it does a whole lot more.
Since the EGR does lower combustion temp, you can run more timing at cruise and get better milage though.
If the engine is running correctly, it doesn't increase life either. if you have a properly working cooling system, then engine temp. doesn't change all that much. Some cars don't have EGR because they are efficient enough to pass emissions and EPA milage standards without it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by oil pan 4
It only works at part throttel it should be closed at idel (or you will lose vacc and stall) and wot.
It helps lean out and lower chamber temps when you cruse getting you more gas milage.
The bad thing it does is fill your intake and heads with carbon, it's the only big dirty draw back.
If you have a nice smoothly ported intake and heads like me, I say toss it.
It only works at part throttel it should be closed at idel (or you will lose vacc and stall) and wot.
It helps lean out and lower chamber temps when you cruse getting you more gas milage.
The bad thing it does is fill your intake and heads with carbon, it's the only big dirty draw back.
If you have a nice smoothly ported intake and heads like me, I say toss it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Originally posted by rx7speed
if you lean out the a/f you run hotter so it wouldn't lower compression temps at that poit
if you lean out the a/f you run hotter so it wouldn't lower compression temps at that poit
Keep the EGR unless you ABSOLUTELY have to get rid of it. I've got all kinds of aftermarket parts, and my heads aren't even supposed to be used with EGR. But my EGR system is still hooked up and operating. Car runs funny without it, as a matter of fact. KEEP IT!
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Originally posted by Nixon1
I'm assuming by introducing spent, noncombustible gases that are not going to heat up and burn like the rest of the mixture is, so those spent gases are going to be much cooler
I'm assuming by introducing spent, noncombustible gases that are not going to heat up and burn like the rest of the mixture is, so those spent gases are going to be much cooler
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
I agree with everything posted above in theory, but in practice there has been no discernable difference in any of the cars I have removed it from, whether permanent or temporary. If EGR improved performance, or helped with anything, why don't you ever see a race car of ANY kind running it? Even GM deletes it on engines that run cleanly enough without it (such as LT4s, 01-up LS1s, etc). Granted, a stock engine in stock tune (set up for emissions) will probably run better with it, but on anything modified, esp with a cam change, its not going to help.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Originally posted by LT1guy
I agree with everything posted above in theory, but in practice there has been no discernable difference in any of the cars I have removed it from, whether permanent or temporary. If EGR improved performance, or helped with anything, why don't you ever see a race car of ANY kind running it? Even GM deletes it on engines that run cleanly enough without it (such as LT4s, 01-up LS1s, etc). Granted, a stock engine in stock tune (set up for emissions) will probably run better with it, but on anything modified, esp with a cam change, its not going to help.
I agree with everything posted above in theory, but in practice there has been no discernable difference in any of the cars I have removed it from, whether permanent or temporary. If EGR improved performance, or helped with anything, why don't you ever see a race car of ANY kind running it? Even GM deletes it on engines that run cleanly enough without it (such as LT4s, 01-up LS1s, etc). Granted, a stock engine in stock tune (set up for emissions) will probably run better with it, but on anything modified, esp with a cam change, its not going to help.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LT1guy
Even GM deletes it on engines that run cleanly enough without it (such as LT4s, 01-up LS1s, etc). Granted, a stock engine in stock tune (set up for emissions) will probably run better with it, but on anything modified, esp with a cam change, its not going to help.
Even GM deletes it on engines that run cleanly enough without it (such as LT4s, 01-up LS1s, etc). Granted, a stock engine in stock tune (set up for emissions) will probably run better with it, but on anything modified, esp with a cam change, its not going to help.
Originally posted by 2_point8_boy
Some cars don't have EGR because they are efficient enough to pass emissions and EPA milage standards without it.
Some cars don't have EGR because they are efficient enough to pass emissions and EPA milage standards without it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
I'll just reiterate again...I could tell on my motor. It IS a Ford 5.0.....but it has non emissions heads (Edl Performer RPM)...and even then, you can feel the disabled EGR as SOON as you release the gas pedal. INstead of a smooth transition to deceleration, the engine jerks on the transition. But that's the only difference I notice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 7, 2015 10:15 AM





