V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Doward's First Run!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
Doward's First Run!!!!

Ok, I'm just a messenger at this point. I'm up in KY writing a paper for class tomorrow and I'm relaying what's being told to me on the phone by doward. First run was a 16.4........@94mph. I don't have much info since he's just texting me at the moment...but I'm sure there's traction problems!!!!! It's about a 15 mph increase so far. I'm not good with mph conversions....but i believe that's a mid-low 14 right???....anyways...more to come.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #2  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
update....new time....16.6@95.64mph....almost another 2mph. This time he bogged it off the line trying to take off slow. Still getting no traction. 60' time of 3.84!!!! . He's still spinning stomping it in 2nd gear at around 40mph.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #3  
firebirrrrd's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
well usually when your spinning too much you let off the gas.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #4  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
if you let off the gas...you're times DROP! 94-96 mph is about a 14.3-14.5 mph. once he can hook up...mid 14s will be no problem!!

Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #5  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
...he tried taking off slow and bogged the second time, then hit the gas to keep from bogging, started spinning....and ended up with the 3.84 60'. He's only got 2 runs in thus far....hard to launch a turbo vehicle on one leg, with a stick, and bald rear tires....lol. He's gonna call again when he's got a few more runs in.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #6  
firebirrrrd's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
If you keep in the gas and sit there spinning your time is gonna suck also. Theres more to racing then getting in the car and stomping the gas down.

Lower the air pressure in the rear tires.

Dont floor it

If it bogs then back to tuning you go.

Sounds like he has some tuning to do.

Last edited by firebirrrrd; Oct 20, 2004 at 08:48 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #7  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
Originally posted by firebirrrrd
If you keep in the gas and sit there spinning your time is gonna suck also.

Sounds like he has some tuning to do.
Yup...doing that too as he's going. Making adjustments here and there on the computer. He hasn't had the chance to get some real feedback on computer changes until now.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #8  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
And remember everyone....this is only at 7psi!!!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:03 PM
  #9  
tc3's Avatar
tc3
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI V6
Transmission: 700r4
seems like a waist of time, learning what rpm to launch at and to slip or dump should be done in a parking lot or something, not at the last second
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:07 PM
  #10  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
The street is a LITTLE different than at a track. I know with my truck i can just about launch like a bat outta hell on the street. I try that the same way at Gainesville raceway.....I'm sitting still burning up my one tire. Have you driven at a track before? Gainesville also put down some new track material at the beginning of the racing year...not sure exactly what it is. The street and track are two different things.

Last edited by Ramtufftiger74; Oct 20, 2004 at 09:12 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #11  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Yea, ya gotta have good tires. Bald street tires don't act like slicks. They are like snot on wet ice. Especially on a drag track.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:11 PM
  #12  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
yea...learning to launch for the track cannot be done on the street or in a parking lot... my car will spin quite a bit on the street but at the track...lay it to the floor and it hooks and goes.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #13  
vsixtoy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Dowards Christmas list-

Dear Santa, I want an Auburn Posi.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #14  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by vsixtoy
Dowards Christmas list-

Dear Santa, I want an Auburn Posi.
lol. last i heard he has a heavy duty zexel torsen unit to put in it. he just hasn't had time to put it in.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #15  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Damn, thats some good news for V6 owners who think they are at a dead end. And really good news for those people who put a 3.4L in as an upgrade. Add dowards kit, if he goes ahead and produces it and you possibly have a 13 second ride. Add more boost and who know's what could happen. Maybe BOOM if you aren't careful.

Very glad to hear when Doward, Vortex, or Tech Smurf succeeds with these projects even though I don't own a V6 car.

I still want to turbo my GTA though. :lala:
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 10:02 PM
  #16  
firebirrrrd's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Thirdgen89GTA


Very glad to hear when Doward, Vortex, or Tech Smurf succeeds with these projects even though I don't own a V6 car.

I still want to turbo my GTA though. :lala:
Hell yeah!

http://www.bmrfabrication.com/FeatureCars/RickH.htm
:hail:

BTW a Vid would be cool if possible. (of doward i mean)

One thing I think all of us can agree on, weather your a v6 man, v8 man, or a jap car man. TURBO"S are cool as , well you know.

Last edited by firebirrrrd; Oct 20, 2004 at 10:16 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #17  
7plagues's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: UofA(Tucson), AZ
Car: 92 Precision Red Firebird
Engine: v6->357 vortec xe262h rpm intake
Transmission: t5-> t56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.42s
He has to be faster than that if he pulled on a 350z....i think if he gets some tires and posi....leans how to launch good, he could definatly have high 13s!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #18  
Ramtufftiger74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: Dodge Ram 1500 CC Short Bed
Engine: 5.2L V8
Transmission: 46RE Auto.
Originally posted by 7plagues
He has to be faster than that if he pulled on a 350z....i think if he gets some tires and posi....leans how to launch good, he could definatly have high 13s!
not neccessarily, 1/4 time is only PART of performance. Having the turbo gives him the adavantage on top end v. a n/a vehicle. Even if 1/4 mile times are the same....after 1/4 doward is still pulling well to 120 while the 350z is leveling off. Anyways...doward is on the way home, he had a better e.t. on the last run, but ran into a hazard on the track......nothing major....i'll let him tell ya'll when he get's back
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #19  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Yeah, I'm pissed.

How the hell does a TRACK OFFICIAL not notice a 4' stick of exhaust at the end of the track?

Final run of the day -

15.7 @ 93 mph - that was with me SLAMMING THE BRAKES ON at about 20' from the end of the track.

2.7 60' on that one.

To whomever was giving me hell about the 16.x @ 96 mph, Ever thought maybe I wasn't trying to launch? Just maybe I was looking for an increase in MPH at the end, to give me an idea of total HP increase?

Gumby's right - bald tires (I'm talking down to steel threads here man!) on a track are about equal to snot mixed with KY spread over some ice. Slick.

As for the 350z pulling, yes, I know I did now! I did get to run with a G35 (same thing as a 350z, just an Infinity) and he was consistantly trapping 94-95 mph.

Dean, I appreciate it - I've got a HD Zexel sitting in my living room, I've got the 28spline axles, a spare 3.42 gear set, and 2 full differential housings. I just haven't had time to put it all together, and get it under the car! The LSD, LCA's and LCA brackets all will go on together, at the same time. :hail:

Yes, the kits will definetly be produced. Track MPH times are indicating that this 7psi kit has added 91 RWHP. And I haven't finished tuning it yet!

Anyone want 100rwhp turbo kits? What is that, like a 75% increase in power? ALMOST DOUBLE THE POWER???

Actually, current MPH times suggest 9.1 1/8th mile times, and 14.2 1/4 mile times. Again, not finished tuning - and November 6th is Dyno Day. :hail:

*EDIT*

Also, if I'm not mistaken... isn't a 96mph trap speed higher than any stock 3rd gen V8 equipped car? I don't think even the L98s were trapping that high! Hell, I think I'm in LT1 territory!!

Last edited by Doward; Oct 20, 2004 at 11:55 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #20  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Most speed density L98's can trap between 96 and 98mph.

A few freak ones can trap faster, closer to 100mph. 3.8TransAm's 91 GTA 350 pulled a 14.4 @ 98mph out of its *** with a 2.6 60' time spinning through 1st. A MAF L98 is likely to go slower though. Why? I dunno exactly. But there are some freaky fast ones out there too.

Regardless, your turbo setup is doing quite well! If I had a V6 car I'd definitely be looking at one! 3.4L + Turbo kit = some nice power there.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:51 AM
  #21  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
96 MPH?!?! Good *** man!! Friend's mildly modified 87 GN was trapping 94 at about 3000 feet... CRIPES! And we all know he was pushing more than 7 psi. Wow.. seriously.. just.. wow...

And yeah, that converts to about 14.2... 221 RWHP at 3200 lbs .... and the weight guess is probably lower than the car would tip out on the scales, so the HP estimates only go up from there..
Originally posted by vsixtoy
Dowards Christmas list-

Dear Santa, I want an Auburn Posi.
That would be TechSmurf's Christmas List... well... a tiny part of it anyway. The other parts would include, oh, say Dean's entire suspension setup... and a 3.4 or bowtie block... and...
Originally posted by Thirdgen89GTA
Maybe BOOM if you aren't careful.
Oh, I fully expect we'll be breaking our stuff left and right. I'm currently almost glad I only have 13pph injectors.. severely limiting my potential to make things go boom... that, and the fact that I'm not running the car much again until the 749 is in.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:55 AM
  #22  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
I still want one Screw election day, NOV 6 is DYNO day!!! I was checking out this guys GST today, nice little 16G turbo sounded awesome when the BOV sounded....I jus gotsta get one!
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 02:08 AM
  #23  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Tell that fool doward to put some slicks and a zexel torsen in it and to lay off that pipe I saw him smoking in one of those pictures (Love that pic doward, classic!)
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 02:17 AM
  #24  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
tsk tsk tsk
16.4.... you made it into civic grounds or .... *hangs head in shame* my realm





but can't say much your cutting a worse 60 then I do putting about 6mph faster then me I know EASILY a lot faster then me if we went from a roll


not bad for a ghetto setup. no offence meant by that either but last I heard which was some time ago you more or less threw some parts together with a little work and said lets go....
so man you get my respect









NOW WORK ON TRACTION!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 02:46 AM
  #25  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
ah this is gonna be sweet, i'm just wondering what kinda engine life this thing is gonna have? i want a kit but i don't wanna blow my motor
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:16 AM
  #26  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
ROFL, no offense to anyone, but I think you got me confused with TechSmurf's setup - his was a toss-it-together-and-go! project.

This has been much more involved - 91rwhp difference based on the MPH. 91 freaking rear wheel horsepower man!! Are you guys understanding this?! A stock V6, with a 75 shot of nitrous, and I'VE STILL GOT MORE POWER!!!

That's absolutely awesome, on only 7psi. Remember, I was running 10, before the external wastegate.

Going to be going over the datalogs tonight after school. I'm still happy as can be with it!

Yes. The car is flat out FAST from a roll. Next up will be -

Building a real rear end (3.42 28spline HD Zexel Torsen)
LCAs - probably Spohn's
Relocation brackets - again Spohn here.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 08:09 AM
  #27  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I still think you should set up a paypal weeding gift/donation fund for 2 drag radials. I am sure everyone would toss ya $2 just to get some good numbers.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #28  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
It wouldn't be tech related, so Techsmurf wouldn't let me post it
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 11:18 AM
  #29  
9D1BURD's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
From: Bloomingdale, IL , United States
Car: 1997 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Also, if I'm not mistaken... isn't a 96mph trap speed higher than any stock 3rd gen V8 equipped car? I don't think even the L98s were trapping that high! Hell, I think I'm in LT1 territory!!
Just to let you know, my LT1/T56 trapped 97 missing second gear with a bad opti.

But you are doing awesome man, almost makes me wish i kept the v6 in my car.....Almost
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #30  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
9d1burd ain't lying. He made his tranny go BOOM But he still managed 15.3 @ 97mph.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #31  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
that is way more insane than i thought it would be. i wanna see what my 3.4 will do w/ that setup...... and a few other things here and there

im gonna need the posi as well. ive started looking at possibilities since its down till april or so. paint, trans rebuild w/ upgraded clutch, and possibly posi.

great times so far doward, keep it up man!!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #32  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Absolutely... going to be doing some more on her tonight.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:10 PM
  #33  
vortex's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
Was definitely a night of mixed emotions... but id say it was worth it.. thanx to all for the support, and sticking thru it with us... even tho we are still far from done.. we've even turned a few of you into believers after the whole I <3 PVC incident.. and to those of you who dont care about this, or just wanna rag... just dont post.. pointless to bash 2 (many more constituants) people's work over a process of 2 years, to do something nobody else had done.. we couldve gone for the easy pop but guess we just dont like being trendy read:v8. anyway, on to the track.. snapped a few pics, and even tho the times werent the best, we're rebuilding and axles with the Zexel, and then we'll swap it in with suspension so it will finally run like a turbo should.
heres a few pics to tide you over. sorry for the blurry.. oh, i have a small silent quicktime movie i took with the camera... does it have to be hosted somewhere? pipe damage
Attached Thumbnails Doward's First Run!!!!-dscn4581.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #34  
vortex's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
first run.. tsi
Attached Thumbnails Doward's First Run!!!!-dscn4574.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #35  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by Doward
It wouldn't be tech related, so Techsmurf wouldn't let me post it
Post it in your sig man. Anything can be in your sig.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:36 PM
  #36  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Can post it in the theoretical and street racing boards. It would still be thirdgen related .
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 01:37 AM
  #37  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
OK, posted in Sig... happy?

I still can't get over the track MPH... man, I can't wait to get on a dyno!!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #38  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by Gumby
Anything can be in your sig.
Not entirely true... we're only marginally more leniant about sigs than posts/threads.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 03:07 AM
  #39  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
But one of my signatures is always okay. :lala:

I wonder how much power a built 3.4L could make with your turbo setup and tuning Doward?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 10:56 AM
  #40  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
A built 3.4 would require a larger turbo, but figuring the same % increase in HP output -

3.4 stock = 160hp
3.4 built = 200hp (?)

I got approx 75% increase in power, 7psi, from stock. Now, if you had an honesd-to-*** 200rwhp, + 75% = 350rwhp.

On 7 psi. Realistically, I'd expect more power - the built 3.4 would (obviously) have a higher VE.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #41  
PimpRod92RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Broomall, PA
Car: 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS; 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera Brougham
Engine: LH0 3.1 Liter V6; YBN 2.8 Liter V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4; TH-440
any current pictures under the hood? congrats man, I will look into your setup for my 3.1 as well!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #42  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I've still got to figure out what to do with the '90-'92 cars - I don't have one locally to try the kit on! I might end up just going with a 12:1 FMU for the 3.1 guys
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 16, 2024 01:50 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
Dec 2, 2016 06:33 PM
perZ
TPI
3
Aug 21, 2015 05:51 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.