anyone know of a hydraulic roller tappet cam for the v6?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
anyone know of a hydraulic roller tappet cam for the v6?
all of my local shops can't find one, i don't wanna go with flat tappet if i can avoid it, and i definatly want to avoid a mechanical cam.
anyone know of one?
anyone know of one?
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
You can have a custom one ground from Crane or Comp Cams... the stock '94+ 3100/3400s have roller cams...
The problem is in the oiling of them, though! From what I understand, using the stock roller lifters will cause you to starve the crank of oil.
The problem is in the oiling of them, though! From what I understand, using the stock roller lifters will cause you to starve the crank of oil.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Re: anyone know of a hydraulic roller tappet cam for the v6?
Originally posted by kretos
all of my local shops can't find one, i don't wanna go with flat tappet if i can avoid it, and i definatly want to avoid a mechanical cam.
anyone know of one?
all of my local shops can't find one, i don't wanna go with flat tappet if i can avoid it, and i definatly want to avoid a mechanical cam.
anyone know of one?
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Rockford, IL
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by Doward
You can have a custom one ground from Crane or Comp Cams... the stock '94+ 3100/3400s have roller cams...
The problem is in the oiling of them, though! From what I understand, using the stock roller lifters will cause you to starve the crank of oil.
You can have a custom one ground from Crane or Comp Cams... the stock '94+ 3100/3400s have roller cams...
The problem is in the oiling of them, though! From what I understand, using the stock roller lifters will cause you to starve the crank of oil.
Last edited by Jerriko 3.4; Jan 5, 2005 at 02:43 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by Jerriko 3.4
This is not true and a myth at best, at least involving mechanical roller cams. I looked into this and about 20 different people over at 60degreeV6.com are running mechanic roller cams without any problems. Go over there and ask.
This is not true and a myth at best, at least involving mechanical roller cams. I looked into this and about 20 different people over at 60degreeV6.com are running mechanic roller cams without any problems. Go over there and ask.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
A roller cam can make more power, as you have have steeper cam lobes - think of the lobes on a graph - you have more 'area under the curve' with a roller camshaft.
Not to mention less friction losses
Not to mention less friction losses
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
ok i'm using a hi flow oil pump for my new motor. everyones been telling me to run the crane 2030 cam, sound like a good idea? if its better to run a flat tappet then i'll run one.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
it's mainly how the blocks designed that makes it so crappy to run roller lifters. If you can score the "somewhat pricey" aluminum gmpp 60* block, this oiling issue has been taken care of. I also think teh gen II/gen III fwd blocks have this improved oiling also.
Last edited by Project: 85 2.8 bird; Jan 5, 2005 at 06:05 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
It's not "better" to run a flat tappet... it's just a bit of a PITA to convert to roller. The reduced friction of a roller setup will free up power regardless of your cam profile.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Project 85 is right... but hey, a flat tappet works fine for us! 
Also, the FWD blocks will not bolt down to the RWD platform. I am debating whether or not to build an adapter, and sell them, too.

Also, the FWD blocks will not bolt down to the RWD platform. I am debating whether or not to build an adapter, and sell them, too.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma County, CA
Car: '63 Nova Wagon these days
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: 5-speed
These guys,
http://www.killerbv6.com/homepage.html
Sell a "conversion kit" to use a FWD engine in a RWD application. their specialty is V6 conversions for the MGB. They like to use T5s. Not sure if it is a special bellhousing or an adaptor. might work in a 3rd gen camaro.
Frank
http://www.killerbv6.com/homepage.html
Sell a "conversion kit" to use a FWD engine in a RWD application. their specialty is V6 conversions for the MGB. They like to use T5s. Not sure if it is a special bellhousing or an adaptor. might work in a 3rd gen camaro.
Frank
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Rockford, IL
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
it's mainly how the blocks designed that makes it so crappy to run roller lifters. If you can score the "somewhat pricey" aluminum gmpp 60* block, this oiling issue has been taken care of. I also think teh gen II/gen III fwd blocks have this improved oiling also.
it's mainly how the blocks designed that makes it so crappy to run roller lifters. If you can score the "somewhat pricey" aluminum gmpp 60* block, this oiling issue has been taken care of. I also think teh gen II/gen III fwd blocks have this improved oiling also.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I'm going to throw the stock 3100 roller setup I have, into the 2.8 rwd block - I'm going to repair the bottom end, but I'll probably end up starving the main bearings @ 6000 rpm. That's bad
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by Jerriko 3.4
There are no oil issues with a roller cam on the normal 2.8, 3.1, or 3.4 blocks. I verified this over on 60degreev6.
There are no oil issues with a roller cam on the normal 2.8, 3.1, or 3.4 blocks. I verified this over on 60degreev6.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Rockford, IL
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by Doward
Solid roller, yes. Hydraulic roller, no.
Solid roller, yes. Hydraulic roller, no.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





