Dyno Comparison 3.1 vs 5.0
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
Dyno Comparison 3.1 vs 5.0
well i finally got to run my 1991 firebird 5.0 on the dyno today so i thought i would post a comparison to my 1992 Camaro 3.1
1992 Camaro RS 3.1V6 Modded (dyno jet)
~133hp
~178Tq
1991 Firebird 5.0V8 STock (mustang Dyno)
~134hp @ 4000RPM
~216Tq @ 2500RPM
~16.6 1/4 mile(ewww)
i have to say im a bit dissapointed with that 5.0, and its in damn good shape. i know there are a few diffrences in the dynos but i still expected more outtve the V8.
1992 Camaro RS 3.1V6 Modded (dyno jet)
~133hp
~178Tq
1991 Firebird 5.0V8 STock (mustang Dyno)
~134hp @ 4000RPM
~216Tq @ 2500RPM
~16.6 1/4 mile(ewww)
i have to say im a bit dissapointed with that 5.0, and its in damn good shape. i know there are a few diffrences in the dynos but i still expected more outtve the V8.
Last edited by Pillsbry10; May 3, 2005 at 11:39 AM.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
with that being TBI, it sure jumped the tq up.
I belive the 305 suffers from crappy heads and intake correct?
I belive the 305 suffers from crappy heads and intake correct?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
im not really sure on the problems with the 305, havnet really researched v8s a whole lot.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: Greenville, SC
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I belive the 305 suffers from crappy heads and intake correct?
. Heads, cam, intake, and exhaust. Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Lol on paper a fuel injected 5.0l V8 sounds incredible yet in reality not that much better than the v6, except more parts and tq. I didn't think the TBI would be that bad.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Re: Dyno Comparison 3.1 vs 5.0
Originally posted by Pillsbry10
i have to say im a bit dissapointed with that 5.0, and its in damn good shape. i know there are a few diffrences in the dynos but i still expected more outtve the V8.
i have to say im a bit dissapointed with that 5.0, and its in damn good shape. i know there are a few diffrences in the dynos but i still expected more outtve the V8.
Last fall Super Street Magazine (I think it was them) did a test of dynos using the same vehicle. Yep, they took the same truck to 7 different dynos and got, surprise!, 7 different numbers. The difference from "best" to "worst" was 58HP!! With the SAME truck!!
Dyno numbers don't mean squat unless you do a baseline pull, install your mods, and do another pull on the same dyno, with the same technician running it, and under the same atmospheric conditions. I did this a year ago with some parts on my other car (NOT the bone stock 3.1 Camaro!). We did three pulls stock and got numbers like 175, 178, 176HP. We installed the parts and did three more pulls, with numbers like 205, 208, 210HP. Those numbers can be used for comparison, I don't believe yours really can.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM





